Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Asset. I suggested something like this a long time ago. BBW was controversial and whilst a lot of people loved his edgy comedy, there was no way to show if you liked it but of course he was controversial so the "report this post" option was available for the people who didn't like him but nothing was available for those who did.


As a result he got lots of reports and got banned, there were no likes. I'm sure the likes would have outnumbered the reports so I suggested it then.


I know SJ would approve.

What about a 'polarise' option?


I think about 40% of what BBW did was edgy comedy, the rest was boring vitriol. He wasn't the brightest card in the pack and he could be very unpleasant.


I suspect that he was actually banned for being monotonously cynical. Since most people would argue that was insufficient reason, then a WMD argument was constructed around it.


Having said that I'm sure I'm on thin ice myself, and people in glasshouses etc.

Like it or not?

Some of the messages can be judged as likeable or not.

It might be helpful to do it this way.

Highlite this message from below the line, Copy and Paste into reply, delete the answers and type in your own.

_____________________________________________________________


Like it or not?

Do I like Dog Pooh?

No because I once kicked some off the pavement forgetting I was wearing open toed high heel shoes, that's where I got the name Winnie the Pooh from my work mates.

It was BBW's humour that got him a long stay of execution several times and meant he was indulged with many alter egos against the rules.

He'd always blow it though and come out with something utterly offensive, he just couldn't help himself.


*the above text is held on a moderator access online dropbox for fucking tediously repetitious easy reproduction.

Let it lie for god's sake.

Hugs - I think he was ultimatley banned for something that actually made everyone feel a bit sick, so he had to go.


The point is that when you have someone who is close to the egde, the objectors win every time, there is no option to show support, so I second Asset's suggestion.

Have all the likes in the world for someone like that if you want- they are still going to get banned. Admin might try and explain the root causes but without being party to the source you are still "liking" something without knowing all the facts


As for "like" buttons, aspiring to be ANYthing like facebook these days? ick

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> FB has it's faults, no doubt.

>

> How anyone who loves twitter or any other social

> networking can slate FB makes me laugh though. You

> won't convince me that one is any better than

> another.


FaceBook and Twitter are two Completely different enterties with very little in common with their usage.


People make connections on Facebook with friends, family members, and other people that they care to keep in touch with.

You will probably know most of the people you associate with.



Twitter is less about social friendships.

Twitter allows people to follow important topics, people, and conversations that are relevant or interesting to them. It's a much more detached connection.


You will probably not know or ever meet most of the people you follow or reply to.


Fox.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Advertising and pointless apps aside (both of

> which are easy to ignore) - the content on

> Facebook is provided by 'you' and your 'friends'.

>

>

> So if you find Facebook boring and tedious, you

> know where to point the finger.



"Like"

Fox, lots of people use twitter as you describe, but lots don't.


Either way, I think getting snobby about one of them is a bit rich if you use the other.


I am a regular FB user. I ignore every invite to play games, or join stupid tabloidesque causes, but I enjoy lots of other stuff.

In all fairness bob is right, there's a tendency among most facebook users to accept all friend requests in order not to look rude, even if they're simply old colleagues, people at school you never even talked to then or that bloke down the pub with a wooden leg.


I did a bit of a cull but most of them refriendrequested? (meaning of course I HAD offended them in so doing).


The strealthy way of doing it is to edit the updates you're interested in from that person.


I'm now untroubled by all those awful mawkish pictures of babies with freakish ailments or youtube clips of music I don't like (same can't be said of those damn corporate likes ads though).

Weirdly enough some of those people I didn't like at school have turned out to be really interesting grown ups, and I'm sure there are plenty of them who have muted my incessant bleating about the fluff from my navel.


Of course with the ignore button gone on here you lot are screwed....mwa hah ha haHAAHAHAHAH

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...