Jump to content

Recommended Posts

For me, it's the intelligent folk thinking it's not worth bothering about that's irritating. I'm surprised at both Otta and Pibe thinking such.


If instead, as women, we should bother ourselves with the bigger questions, for instance, the glass ceiling, then I would ask what creates the glass ceiling? The idea that women are less capable, less ruthless in the boardroom, are more refined and gentle than big, burly men? More "ladylike"? More in need of a special pink pen?


It's a pervasive thing. No individual (or very, very few) means offence in using the term. It's the term itself that's the issue. As long as there is equivalency with the word "man", rather than "gentleman" (which comes with its own expectations of behaviour), it perpetuates the notion that women are to be quiet and seemly.


Words have power and I'm surprised to see people deny it.

Rosie.


Interestingly, huge numbers of threads especially in the Family room started by woman start with "Ladies". Do a forum search and scan down ...are these poor repressed woman or is it one of 'them' words that only the oppressed are allowed to use, or possibly does everyone not see it like you without being repressed/unaware or unintelligent?


edited for split infinitive and similar howlers

Nah dufus, do some reading man before you get all smug and sarky.


If you read my post further up, I said I have no problem with it as a form of address, in the same context that you'd use gentlemen. Thus addressing a group of women, "good morning women" sounds odd, in the same way that addressing a group of men as "good morning men" (unless you're on army manoeuvres) sounds odd. In this situation, "ladies" and "gentlemen" seem apposite.


Equivalency.

Oh what a tangle - as a further illustrattion my missus quite often says Come on Ladies to her mates virtually/or in reality ie if they want a night out etc I'd never say come on gentleman/gents in a similar situation. I honestly can't remember for eg when I heard it said in a mixed crowd apart from clearly ironically nor when I last heard it in the workplace in a non-formal setting...though I'm obviously less likely to pick it up. if my kids bump into a woman on Lordship Lane I suspect I will still say "Say sorry to that Lady" but now return to my home fretting that not only am I a perpetuator of stereotypical gendererism but I am socialising my kids with it....maybe. I think my my mum would be mildley offended if a stranger reffered to her as a woman rather than a lady (i will check) but would other woman of a similar age - it's now becoming an ageist/sexist minefield.

"For me, it's the intelligent folk thinking it's

not worth bothering about that's irritating.

I'm surprised at both Otta and Pibe thinking

such."


I believe in picking your battles, and this one just doesn't seem worth fighting when there is far worse embedded sexism in society.


But I promise never to call you a lady (I'm pretty sure I never would have anyway).

Otta, I genuinely believe the language we use to describe a thing has an impact on the way we perceive that thing.


I studied it in the abstract at university, and felt it to be true then. And having come up against a glass ceiling myself, and been acutely aware of the language my male boss used to describe me and other female employees, I could see first hand that the two things were inextricably linked. And in this case, to my detriment.


That's why it's a battle I think is worth fighting - it's part of a bigger battle that I think is worth winning.

I, for one, would be disappointed if the term 'lady' was driven from common use, coupled with the fact that it would never occur to my female acquaintances to object to that term being used as they would see it as a form of politeness . Long may it continue to thrive!

Then there's the New York cabbie who leans out of his window to yell "Hey, move your goddamn ass lady!"

An English cabbie might yell "Move your bleedin' arse woman!" ...is that better?


I've had midle-aged women (in shops or pubs) call me love, darling, chuck and pet (regional variations) for years but only felt able to reply in a similar vein when I was over 30. Before that it was an impersonal "thanks" because "Thanks ma'am" was out of the question and "Thanks missus" made one feel like the artful dodger. "Thanks lady", although still odd-sounding, would have been as useful as "mate" or "pal" back then.


Re quid's missus saying "Come on ladies", I've heard 'girls' used in similar circs by women well past 50 but maybe there are just more alternatives for men: "Come on guys*, fellahs, boys, lads, chaps (usually ironic), gentlemen/gents (ditto for irony), you-bunch-of-fucks **,


*although this is often used for male and female groups

**only really used in a group of close friends

I don't really think too much about it (I'm genuinely not that bothered by the use of Lady vs Women) but when I do, I think I am with RosieH. So much of what defines a word is wrapped up in intent of use. Add to that, established stereotyping and a simple word can then be loaded with all kinds of meaning. So I would only take exception to the use of 'lady' in a specific context.

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't really think too much about it (I'm

> genuinely not that bothered by the use of Lady vs

> Women) but when I do, I think I am with RosieH. So

> much of what defines a word is wrapped up in

> intent of use. Add to that, established

> stereotyping and a simple word can then be loaded

> with all kinds of meaning. So I would only take

> exception to the use of 'lady' in a specific

> context.


Hmm.... the tone with which someone says addresses you can be offensive, and if the intent is there then I don't think that an innocent word such as 'lady' or 'gentleman', or even 'woman' or 'man' can necessarily contain the insult - it is more the context.


I don't believe there is any right or wrong here, but I do think it is ill mannered to take offence when clearly none was intended. Some find a man saying 'ladies first' insulting, I find it quite charming and am not at all averse to chivalry :), although I don't expect it. I don't find that chivalry demeans me or insults me - I can hold my own in this world very well, including in a somewhat male dominated workplace - I just see it as one of the many pleasantries that a civilised society can extend to each other.

There's a certain school of thought that would say that you moved off the path because you perceived that as a woman she was so weak and inferior that she required an act of charity.


Whether you buy that interpretation seems to depend very much on your general outlook. It's a pretty ugly one that I'm happy not to share.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • And I worry this Labour government with all of it's own goals and the tax increases is playing into Farage's hands. With Trump winning in the US, his BFF Farage is likely to benefit from strained relations between the US administration and the UK one. As Alastair Campbell said on a recent episode of The Rest is Politics who would not have wanted to be a fly on the wall of the first call between Angela Rayner and JD Vance....those two really are oil and water. Scary, scary times right now and there seems to be a lack of leadership and political nous within the government at a time when we really need it - there aren't many in the cabinet who you think will play well on the global stage.
    • I look to the future and clearly see that the law of unintended consequences will apply with a vengeance and come 2029 Labour will voted out of office. As someone once said 'The trouble with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money'. 
    • Labour seems to be taxing the many to get to the few in so many policies they have implemented. Look at the farmer situation: yes there are some rich farmers but the vast majority are not and they are, in my mind, the very definition of a working person - the very people this country relies upon. Most are family businesses. They were re-running some of the Simon Reeves programmes on the Lake District and it was filmed just after Covid but they featured an 18 year old farmer who was took over his parents farm after they both died of cancer within months of each other. He and his school friends were mucking in to keep the farm going and continue the family business. Today, he would have been hit by a big tax bill too. The challenge is Rachel Reeves' budget desperately needs growth and with the news today that the economy barely grew on, ostensibly, fears of what the budget was going to hit people with and the fact post budget many businesses are saying costs will have to go up due to the increases in employee NI but at the same time saying wage growth, and even jobs, will be impacted we may be heading towards a very nasty perfect storm. Public services desperately need reform not just more money. Wes Streeting said that reform was needed in the NHS and he was talking in a manner more akin to a Tory health secretary than a Labour one!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...