Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 8 months later...

Good track. Not a massive fan of Face To Face, but you can't go wrong covering material like that.


This thread has reminded me of the forthcoming "our band could bbq your life" weekender at the Windmill, Brixton... various bands covering all your favourite US underground bands (Husker Du, Black Flag, Dinosaur Jr, Replacements, etc). I might check it out.

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Brendan were you being ironic or summat when

> you

> > said youtube had noone calle Ian Hunter?

>

> I was only trying to give Honaloochie and

> existential crisis.


Well it didn't get quite as bad as that, but you made me look.

  • 3 weeks later...

I dont think anyone could top Paul Shane's cover of 'You've Lost That Loving Feeling' live on Pebble Mill about 10 years ago. Its floating about on YouTube somewhere, and was rinsed spectacularly by Vic and Bob throughout a whole series of Shooting Stars.


I cant watch it without literally howling with laughter.

  • 2 weeks later...

Was on best man duties at a wedding last year with the lead singer of this once famous boy band from Croydon who attempted to cover and dance



Incredibly their version charted higher (at no 4. in UK) than the Jacksons original which says a lot about where music was at in 1989.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What Firkins were they? The only localish ones I remember were the Phoenix and Firkin and the Fox and Firkin. The Plough has changed its name several times, and then back to the Plough, but to the best of my recollection the Uplands Tavern was named that until it became The Actress, and The Bishop was called something else whose name escapes me (though the smell from the gents lingers in my memory) but I'm pretty sure it wasn't a Firkin?
    • These statements were in the Consultation Findings report published (later than promised) just before the licence was granted:  "The site hire fee goes directly to supporting the delivery of the council’s Events service, which supports the delivery of up to 100 free-to-attend community events per year – please refer to section 1 (Licensing and income)" I've drafted an email to request some more details of these "free-to-attend" events, as "up to" is a fairly meaningless description - could be 100, could be none? - and therefore doesn't help anyone to decide whether it is actually a benefit to the community or not. Even if it is 100, I'm not sure I could name even one of them? "The site hire fee goes directly to supporting the provision of a grants fund – the Cultural Celebrations programme - please refer to section 1 (Licensing and income)" A similarly meaningless statement in terms of gauging whether, or how much, this is a benefit to the local community. What is it, what does it do, how much of the fee goes to it? And how can the fee go "directly" to two different things? Surely, "directly" means without deviation, straight to, without being changed or reduced?? Again, I'll be asking all these questions to the events dept. I find it outrageous & insulting that a public body can try to justify such an intrusive & disruptive event with such flimsy and opaque "benefits", with zero figures or details to quantify them. They may as well not bother with a consultation, just say "Look, we can't be arsed to justify our decision, it's happening so just deal with it".  
    • Thanks so much. Yes I have. Really appreciate your kindness in replying. Thank you.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...