Jump to content

Recommended Posts

?The Green should be retained for croquet/bowls or other lawn games. The Pavilion could be hired for suitable uses.

There is not a need any more ?fun entertainment?. There will be very few quiet areas left.


The Park cannot sustain an increase of footfall which more ?fun entertainment? will bring. The Sexby Garden and the Japanese Garden have already been damaged by use as playgrounds.


The Friends of Peckham Rye Park website www.peckhamryepark.org has more comments.?

Other large sectionS of the park are given over for recreational use by children, parents and younger people: football, other sports, adventure playground, large children?s playground and you?d begrudge one tiny area being set aside for those, probably older, who want something more sedate?


Your provocative use of language indicates you are trolling again but just in case you are really serious then think again.

Does this have to be a low budget option? If not, a lido would be perfect here. If yes, how about replacing the grass with sand and use it as a sandpit or a place to play boules/petanque? Much easier to maintain than the perfectly flat bowling green.

I suspect crazy golf is a preferred option because this an be outsourced to generate maximum income for the council for minimum outlay and effort.


Tennis courts, petanque courts, bowling greens etc don't generate much income and a third party operator isn't going to rent the space from the council in exchange for trying to turn a profit on them.


On that note the adventure playground should be offered to the company running "Go Ape" in Battersea Park.

Go Ape are very good at what they do and that might not be a bad idea.


Crazy golf could work but no-one is going to do that in the winter when it is cold and wet. So I think it could be a seasonal use and the equipment can be stored in winter. There are a wide range of lawn games that could be tried out at other times of the year. And there is also no reason why it couldn't be different things on different days either, attracting a variety of groups and clubs using the facility. So if a bowls team wanted to say use it on Tuesday afternoon, they could. Crazy golf could come out at the weekends etc.

  • 3 weeks later...

Unfortunately there are no longer any bowling clubs who will take on the use of the site. The Friends of Peckham Rye Park (I am a committee member) have tried to find alternative uses for it, and are still trying. But a bowling green is expensive to maintain ( the grass needs special care). The park is a Heritage site, so whatever happens there needs to be appropriate for the status of the park. And Southwark want revenue from unused resources ( they say that area of the park costs more than ?5000 a year to maintain).


But the consultation is to seek views for what would be acceptable so please get involved!

Lollipop Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Unfortunately there are no longer any bowling

> clubs who will take on the use of the site. The

> Friends of Peckham Rye Park (I am a committee

> member) have tried to find alternative uses for

> it, and are still trying. But a bowling green is

> expensive to maintain ( the grass needs special

> care). The park is a Heritage site, so whatever

> happens there needs to be appropriate for the

> status of the park. And Southwark want revenue

> from unused resources ( they say that area of the

> park costs more than ?5000 a year to maintain).

>

> But the consultation is to seek views for what

> would be acceptable so please get involved!


I'm glad you have highlighted this! In Southwark this costs around ?5,000 a year in rates alone!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...