Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

Maintaining a bowls or croquet lawn properly is expensive, it's only really viable if a community club takes it on and provides free labour and reqular use, as they did for the bowling green in Dulwich Park. And with several bowls and croquet clubs already in the area, is the extra demand really there?


A couple of tennis courts seems like a better bet, it's a lovely location and there's a shortage of courts in that part of the Borough. All the local tennis clubs are overrun at the moment and one of the clubs might be willing to take it on and raise the money to build and maintain them, with a small fee for use, as they have done in the Bromley parks?

The problem with tennis courts is that it limits the number of people that can use the space at any one time. Even if fully booked, it doesn't seem like a good use of the space. Also, do we really want the noise of tennis balls breaking through the peace of the Japanese and Sexby Gardens?

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The problem with tennis courts is that it limits

> the number of people that can use the space at any

> one time. Even if fully booked, it doesn't seem

> like a good use of the space. Also, do we really

> want the noise of tennis balls breaking through

> the peace of the Japanese and Sexby Gardens?


Completely agree. We all need areas of tranquillity, especially in urban areas, why destroy it?

first mate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Blah Blah Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > The problem with tennis courts is that it

> limits

> > the number of people that can use the space at

> any

> > one time. Even if fully booked, it doesn't seem

> > like a good use of the space. Also, do we

> really

> > want the noise of tennis balls breaking through

> > the peace of the Japanese and Sexby Gardens?

>

> Completely agree. We all need areas of

> tranquillity, especially in urban areas, why

> destroy it?



If you want peace then leave it through benign neglect to simply become a regular grassy part of the park like any other. But if you want the space actively used then tennis/multisports is the most likely to be sustainable. Better that than crazy golf which is what is what the Council seem to be looking at.

Dogkennelhillbilly Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm surprised to hear tennis balls being described

> as particularly noisy!



Have you not heard the grunts of professional tennis players that people imitate when playing


Loud enough to wake the dead in Nunhead cemetery I would like to bet

I had suggested sessions of yoga, tai- chi, etc.. in summer? Quite a few people already go to this area to do this anyway so that could be developed for the community on a pay as you go basis? The ?club? house could be used for massage, physio and perhaps yoga in winter? Perhaps I am way off base but it just feels a natural fit and could benefit all ages.

alice Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What?s happened to the adventure playground?


That?s a point. That is also quite a large area and, if not being used, might be a better space for noisier activities.

first mate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I had suggested sessions of yoga, tai- chi, etc..

> in summer? Quite a few people already go to this

> area to do this anyway so that could be developed

> for the community on a pay as you go basis? The

> ?club? house could be used for massage, physio and

> perhaps yoga in winter? Perhaps I am way off base

> but it just feels a natural fit and could benefit

> all ages.


I like this suggestion. There is no reason why it can not be a multi-use facility (makes perfect sense) for relatively quiet activities that fit in with the surrounding ambience. There is plenty of space elsewhere around the park for noisier sports.


And just to add, that even crazy golf, doesn't have to be a permanent use. Crazy golf apparatus can be brought out and stored at will.

Shrieker Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> Tennis balls breaking the peace? Dont be silly. On

> several occasions this summer me and my mates have

> sat in the gardens with cans of beer and loud

> speakers, and no one seemed to be too fussed about

> our presence. Not even a dirty look. So, why when

> 5 or so loud, tipsy friends gathering with music

> in the gardens is not a problem, why would the

> noise of a tennis ball be?


Tennis balls being hit all day every day in that area of the park is not only a poor use of the space numbers wise, but also is a disturbance to the surrounding gardens. Had I passed you with loudspeakers, I would have asked you to move or turn them off. The truth is that most people would be afraid to ask a group of people disturbing the peace and quiet to move or cease. So don't presume to know what anyone actually thought about your disregard for others. I suspect you are trolling anyway and it never happened ;)

I don't want to go down the rabbit hole too much, but are you saying you live near a tennis court now and the sound of balls being hit and bouncing is annoying, or are you saying that you imagine it would be annoying to live near a tennis court?
Please, whatever it may become, not another caf?. It?s unnecessary and clich?d. A centre used as a nature reserve or educational facility would be of use to children and adults. Sport is ok but it?s always a minority of the whole population that plays it, and when you split it into tennis/bowls/etc. it becomes even more niche.

Dogkennelhillbilly Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't want to go down the rabbit hole too much,

> but are you saying you live near a tennis court

> now and the sound of balls being hit and bouncing

> is annoying, or are you saying that you imagine it

> would be annoying to live near a tennis court?


Neither. I am making the case for any use being in proportion to what immediately surrounds the space - namely tranquil gardens. There are other parts of the park dedicated for sport and noisier activities. I think it is perfectly reasonable to protect the quieter spaces where they exist.

Shrieker Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> You've of told me to move or turn the speakers

> off?! i dont think you would have mate. You would

> have regretted it, knowing my lot you would most

> likely have ended up in one of the ponds lol.


Yes I would have and had you or your plastic trolls assaulted me, I would have seen you all in troll court. Grow up.

How rude. You should tone it down. I walk my dog in the park everyday. It's a gorgeous space and well respected by all who use it. The picture you paint is completely inaccurate. It will be guaranteed that you are not a regular user. Save your ill judged spiel and awful language for twitter. Silly man.

The Green should be retained for croquet/bowls or other lawn games. The Pavilion could be hired for suitable uses.

There is not a need any more ?fun entertainment?. There will be very few quiet areas left.


The Park cannot sustain an increase of footfall which more ?fun entertainment? will bring. The Sexby Garden and the Japanese Garden have already been damaged by use as playgrounds.


The Friends of Peckham Rye Park website www.peckhamryepark.org has more comments.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • wanted lego my child is collecting lego if you have any for sale please let me know
    • I'd actually go the whole hog and do a fondue, we all remember them fondly from parties in the last century or trips to Switzerland.  As long as it is cheese, not chocolate, urghhh
    • Gosh, that all sounds so familiar!  Southwark are constantly holding up their Outdoor Events Policy as proof of process, but then constantly allow exceptions when things aren't quite done correctly. Point in case, Gala's licence application - extract from the Consultation Findings Report - "The GALA team formally submitted their application to hold GALA 2025 to the council on the 7 October 2024. It is usually a requirement that applications for larger scale events are submitted with a minimum of 9 months to process them, but discretion can be applied if there are mitigating circumstances. 8.4 of the Outdoor Events Policy clarifies that processing applications received outside the stated lead-in times is at the Council's discretion. In this case: • The council were aware that Assembled Gala were preparing an application for the event to take place in 2025 in advance of their submission date, with operational discussions already taking place • GALA festival has been taking place in Peckham Rye Park since 2018 – less time is needed regarding event planning than if it were a new event • The GALA team already have a Premises Licence in place for this event (this is a pre- requisite for the Event Licence to be issued), so no time needed to be factored in for a premises licence application and decision-making process" So despite the fact that there would need to be major planning decisions due to the change of site access, they didn't think Gala needed to adhere to the same rules as everyone else? Makes me wonder what other rules they are exempted from... On a similar note, has anyone received a Resident Communication letter, containing the contact details for issues? We haven't, and we live directly opposite the site on Colyton Rd. They were supposedly distributed on 29/4...
    • We find that just adding your own favourites is the best way - everyone likes different things and your guests will likely be happy enough
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...