Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I was wondering if anyone could shed some light on the different options for the Ergo baby carrier - mainly I'm comparing the original to the performance (don't know too much about the sport). I've done huge amounts of googling, but as the sling library isn't open again until next Wed I was hoping for some personal recommendations. I've worn the original and it's great, but don't know anything about the others. The performance seems to have thinner and more contoured shoulder straps (are they still comfortable?), lighter and more water resistant material, some meshy bits, a zipper pocket that hides the hood (the hood on the original seems a bit fussy), and a longer waist strap (but a curvy bit that dips lower in the centre).


Any help would be greatly appreciated!


ps - I have a huge baby (well, he's only 8 weeks but I can see where we're headed) and a not so great back. I won't be wearing the sling for huge amounts of time but would like as much comfort as possible.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/26168-ergo-which-one/
Share on other sites

Eek and if you have a big boy I'd actually recommend the Manduca - gives more space as they grow, has built in infant insert and will allow you to front carry a very hefty boy as you can cross the straps for extra support (til you're ready to back carry). The Ergo is great but is always recommend the Manduca now, have used both for my 2yo.


Sorry to complicate (and the Manduca is pricier but worth every penny).

I found this comparison really helpful (from a Canadian retailer) when deciding to buy a Manduca as well as my Ergo (and other slings, ahem). Good luck and happy babywearing, it's the best!


http://extraordinarybabyshoppe.blogspot.co.uk/2009/08/product-comparison-ergo-vs-manduca.html?m=1


Edited to add link!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Some of the replies to you have been unnecessarily rude. It's not unreasonable for wheelchair users and everyone else to expect to have access to the footpath. But instead of criticising the council for not already knowing about the problem and casting pre-emptive aspersions on their responsiveness...maybe you should actually take the step of letting the Council know about your concern? When I had a similar-ish complaint, the Highways team responded very quickly.
    • "The tables outside the Blue Brick were in fact mostly within the cafe's curtilage." All the tables were placed on the pavement, not part of the cafe's curtillage any more than the pavement outside my house is a part of my curtillage. There are no signs of demarcation like studs or different paving which is usual. I believe though many cafe's were awarded licenses by the council during the pandemic allowing tables to be placed on the pavement. "Yes, Jenijenjen [your 'real name', obvs], I have posted over a number of years. Say what you intend clearly about these previous posts, so that other readers can judge, rather than alluding to them obscurely as if they somehow invalidate the matter I raise here. Good grief."  Blimey, you're reading something into this post that really isn't there and was not intended.  No hidden agenda, merely an observation.    
    • They do that in Chelsea. Bars and cafes can buy the parking space in front of their shop to put tables in.  We should be more like Chelsea.
    • I like seeing everyone out enjoying themselves.  I'd prefer Lordship Lane to be car free and all the cafes etc have tables outside.        
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...