Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Okay Scotland look, if you stay we'll drop our kecks and bend over... you can even take a run up!


I know that combating a pie-in-the-sky future as promised by the Yes people with a similarly vague/unrealistic basket of promises must seem like a good idea but this is just getting embarrassing.

I enjoyed this (written by Nicholas Pegg):


The Tale Of The Priceless And Irreplaceable Antique Dining Table


by Hans Atheist Andersen


Once upon a time, some dear old friends were sitting around a priceless and irreplaceable antique dining table. What made this table so precious was that it had been fashioned many hundreds of years earlier from the remains of not one but several ancient tables, making it a unique and beautiful piece of furniture.


And so the old friends sat around the priceless and irreplaceable antique dining table, eating and drinking and chatting, occasionally disagreeing about this or that, but on the whole being very nice to each other and enjoying the most pleasant dinner party.


Then some of the people sitting at one end of the priceless and irreplaceable antique dining table declared that it would be a good idea to saw it in two. Not everyone thought the same, so they decided to have a vote on the matter. It was agreed by all who sat around the priceless and irreplaceable antique dining table that those sitting down at the other end wouldn?t have any say in whether it was sawn in two.


All, that is, except for one little boy, who timidly put up his hand and enquired, ?Please may I ask why I don?t get a vote? Because, you know, I?m sitting at the table too, and I think sawing it in two would be rather a pity.?


And the people at the other end of the priceless and irreplaceable antique dining table told the little boy to shut the f**k up because he was an ignorant bully who didn?t know what he was talking about and in any case he had no right to an opinion because he wasn?t sitting at their end of the priceless and oh anyway you get the general idea.

win-win for the scotch if this doesnt come off - they will be flooded with cash from Westminster for the forseeable in order to keep them onside from whoever gets in.


short of a getting a blue passport with a deep fried mars bar rampant and mebbes some plastic tartan coins with bonnie prince charlie on them, London will continue to subsidise their buckfast and skag diet.


Its OK tho England, Faslane will be evacuated just in case and the entire nulcear fleet will relocate to whitstable.Just in case.


English mugs.you will be taken to the cleaners by the canny jocks.

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> All these last minute bribes make me hope they

> vote yes, draw a line under it once and for all. I

> started out a stalwart no, now I just hope we

> never have to go through this shit again, and a no

> vote will just mean 10 years.



What he said.


A convincing No may have drawn a line under it, but IF by some miracle there is a slim win for the No vote, this will come up again soonish.



I did like the antique table story though, sums up how I've felt from the start. It seems somehow wrong that we have absolutely no say in what is happening to the UK, yet I've always felt that I couldn't really voice that for a reason I can't quite explain.


I'd be really interested to know how a "should they stay or go" vote would have come out in the reat of the UK.

I was reading an article that made an interesting point that has been glossed over in all of this. Will MPs representing Scotland in Westminster still have a right to vote on legislation that has no impact on their constituencies going forward? The devolution process being promised by the major parties means that decisions made by Westminster will have very little impact on Scotland. Why should Scotland have a say in how England, Wales and Northern Ireland are run going forward?
In the event of a 'no' vote, expect a major row over any proposed more favorable political/economic settlement for a devo-max Scotland, including re Scots MPs in Westminster, with no public sympathy for Scotland anywhere else in the UK, and especially not in the SE. Subsidising the jocks when they're out of sight/mind is one thing - giving them a load of pressies when they've just voted 51:49 not to f*** off is a bit different.

LondonMix Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was reading an article that made an interesting

> point that has been glossed over in all of this.

> Will MPs representing Scotland in Westminster

> still have a right to vote on legislation that has

> no impact on their constituencies going forward?

> The devolution process being promised by the major

> parties means that decisions made by Westminster

> will have very little impact on Scotland. Why

> should Scotland have a say in how England, Wales

> and Northern Ireland are run going forward?



That's been the case since the Scottish Parliament was established

LondonMix Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was reading an article that made an interesting

> point that has been glossed over in all of this.


This is the 'West Lothian question' - first posed by the late lamented Tam Dalyell in 1977


The antique table story, although it's a rubbish parable, does make a valid point - why can't England (and Wales) also have a say in whether Scotland stays or goes. But frankly I'm finding it difficult to get excited about it all

Of course, but as more powers are devolved the issue becomes more pertinent. How much devolution will the public accept while still allowing Scottish MPs to vote on issues not impacting their constituents?


I?d be interested to hear what everyone thinks this is going to look like going forward following this most recent round of concessions.



???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LondonMix Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I was reading an article that made an

> interesting

> > point that has been glossed over in all of this.

>

> > Will MPs representing Scotland in Westminster

> > still have a right to vote on legislation that

> has

> > no impact on their constituencies going forward?

>

> > The devolution process being promised by the

> major

> > parties means that decisions made by

> Westminster

> > will have very little impact on Scotland. Why

> > should Scotland have a say in how England,

> Wales

> > and Northern Ireland are run going forward?

>

>

> That's been the case since the Scottish Parliament

> was established

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm pretty sure that like everything else all the

> bribes will be paid for by london.

> I can't abide anyone having their cake and eating

> it, hence I'd rather they just left now.



Once again, what he said.

I think this goverment have done a great job at dividing people, better together is a joke, they persist in creating

a divide, and as far as the offer heres a link to official cabinet papers released at beginning of year after 30yrs.

There "invisibility Strategy", They're now preparing the british public just incase its a yes vote, with a big fat

bowl of sour grapes, to the point people believe they will be losing if no vote, but heh theres always the sour grapes.better together, yeah right, after creating a situation where people are now feeling, I wish they'd just leave now.



http://www.heraldscotland.com/mobile/news/home-news/thatcher-minister-wanted-to-secretly-cut-millions-from-scotlands-funding.23069373

Either way now - the outcome's not going to be pretty and it reflects petty (not neccessarily nasty) nationalism/differences etc rather than the positive romaticism some 'Yes' voters seem to claim it is


the outcomes - many english getting fed up with scots and soon and ultimately more devolution, inwardness and autonomy and inwardness, ultimetely in 15-20 years I see us as separate anyway and England out of the EU


Small mindness to me - don't see huge emotional differences in the outcomes that the SNP and UKIP seek. Little englanders and Little scotlanders.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...