Jump to content

Recommended Posts

If reports are true only a single yes / no question will be posed in 2014, rather than include the "Devo Max" option as a second question. However, the trade off appears to be that for this referendum only 16 & 17 year olds, whose names are on the electoral roll, will be allowed to vote.


Is giving 16 & 17 year olds a vote a good idea?


Personally I would say no - they are far more likely to make an emotional rather than balanced judgement. This might suit Alec Salmond as the emotional appeal of independence is high. However, I don't believe it will be good for Scotland as I believe independence to be bad for Scotland and bad for UK.

A referendum where only 16 and 17 year olds are allowed to vote? Sounds like a plan!


"they are far more likely to make an emotional rather than balanced judgement"


Don't agree. They will vote for what they perceive to be in their best interests, just like everyone else.

What's free in Scotland, Steve, is personal care - a non-means tested c?170 pounds per week. Plus another ?70 odd nursing care if it's required.


If you're in a care home you still pay accommodation and living costs - which are considerably more. If you have 22k capital you must pay all food and accommodation elements of a care home (you'll be selling your house). If you have 13-22k capital you contribute to costs, leaving you a minimum weekly living allowance of ?21.90! If you have less than 13k capital then the state pays.


And if you get the personal care allowance you lose the right to attendance allowance and any care element within disability living allowance.


I know this doesn't help your personal situation at all, but there is an impression that all elderly care in Scotland is all free. It's really not, although the personal care element, being non-means tested and universal is more generous than the English situation.


Whether you contribute to it or not is something that better brains than ours have been debating for decades!

Once 16 year olds have been allowed to vote on the referendum I presume Mr Salmond would not then take away that vote and that, as a consequence, the voting age in Scotland would fall to 16 on a permanent basis?


What would be the point of a 16yr old voting for independence and the SNP only to see another party voted in the following year with them unable to vote? Once they are part of the process you can't exclude them again and once a precedent has been set 16-17yr olds must have a vote whenever the rest of the population does, no?


And as this is decided/allowed by the UK government when these 16-17 year olds are still citizens of the UK then I presume people of the same age would be allowed to vote in the next (and all future) UK general election(s)?

Ridgley Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I Don?t have a problem with Scottish independents if that is what the majority wants so long as it is total independent from England.



I can understand this point of view - however, I believe the UK, as a whole, would be diminished if the 300 year partnership were to be completely dissolved. England, Scotland, Wales and, perhaps to a lesser degree, Northern Ireland make a coherent whole with a shared tradition. Separate them and each state becomes a smaller and less significant player on the world stage.


I could be persuaded that ceding Northern Ireland to Eire has a logical basis - as that would also make a coherent whole. However, historical tensions make this very unlikely.


The whole is greater than the sum of its parts.

Hi agree with you completely MM on this but it for the Scottish people to decide on their own future regardless in what we think. But if they decide to go for total independence then that should mean total independence from England it really not fair for the British public to still be paying for it.


I hope it does not come to this I love the idea of different Celtic culture which is part of Britain as my grandfather is Scottish I have a sort of connection.

I agree that the UK is better for all as a whole than for any as a constituent part but, given the short-sightedness/short term emotional arguments that are bound to be used, don't you think the vote will swing towards a yes even though it be motivated by a warped sense of nationalism?


After all, if English people were given a referendum now on whether to abandon ties with Scotland, Wales and/or NI, the vote might easily be a resounding yes even though, imo, it would be disastrous for all concerned.


No one is going to think straight over the next 18 months and we'll just have a protracted period of Cameron et al tip-toeing around trying not to upset Scots voters (to avoid pushing them into a yes vote) until the whole sorry business is concluded.

500th of Flodden Field next year ;-)


I too hope a no vote is cast, we're definitely greater than the sum of our parts.


I'd disagree with MM on the NI point, I reckon Irish union is an inevitability, albeit one a political generation (and end of Irish recession) away.

I was chatting with a young meeja lady in her late twenties who observed that she acquired all her 'news' through Facebook. A newspaper or TV site wasn't in the portfolio.


These are the people who will be deciding the economic and political future of the nation if you put independence to a referendum. Considered insight, consequences, or whether it's a good or bad idea won't really come into the equation.


I share with EP the view that Irish union is inevitable, but it'll only take place when it becomes an irrelevance.

  • 1 year later...

You might not know it but there us a big debate tonight in Glasgow... Salmond versus Darling.


Criminal that they are not showing it outside scotland but you can watch it on the STV online player now?.


As politicians go?I've been up close to Darling and despite not being a massive Labour fan he's got integrity and is one of the best operators I've seen on his feet. Currently destroying Salmond against the odds.

I didn't realise it could be seen online via STV player*


Totally agree with you that its shoddy they aren't showing it outside of Scotland, especially due to the fact that no matter the outcome, there will be ramifications for the whole of the UK.


Have also dealt with Darling up close in the past and found him to be an impressive speaker. This thread makes me realise how much MM is missed, along with some intelligent debate. (Not from me, I hasten to add).





*mainly due to not knowing about STV player's existence!

Without in any way wishing to put darling down, every argument against independence could be presented to any other country, in history which strove for independence at some point, couldn't it?


It all boils down to "it's risky, what's plan b, and you the leader, are a bit shifty"


Which might all be true but so what? Many Irish voted against independence for similar reasons a hundred odd years ago but not many Irish would rekindle that particular relationship

The aspect of the debate that I've found less and less appealing is the "How am I better off" pov.


Those who say they will vote to stay in a union ONLY if the bribes/incentives are big enough and, even then, if they don't get everything they demand now and in the future they may force another vote 10 years down the line. Like a spouse constantly threatening to leave if their partner doesn't give in on everything.


I am tending to think - of them - fuck you, and no, when you've gone you can't still use the car.

I hope they vote yes, then we can round up all the bagpipe players in London (and the rest of the remaining union) and deport them north of the new Hadrian's Wall security barrier

The security barrier will also need to be manned 24x7 so that will solve employment issues in the north of England.

Finally, if Scots need a special visa to come to work or live in England then we can refuse them entry and reduce the strain on housing stock in London and the south east


Dear Alex will solve all the worlds ills if he gets the yes vote :-)


However I personally think we will be better together (despite bag pipe players)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...