Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jessie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm far more interested in what the hospitals and

> children's homes have to say for themselves. BBC

> is a v easy target for right wing press and its

> followers.



Mmmmm. Another sacred cow which can,t be criticised without rasing the normal defensive hogwash? Rubbish, it failed miserably and almost systematically for years on the abuse and more recently by , at best, ignoring it. Not the only guilt party but so what.

it's all starting to sound a bit like the Cleveland Satanic Ring thingy to me now...apparently the main accuser has some form. An enquiry is needed for absolutely clarity and to punish any wromg doers but I feel there is the potential wiff of Conspiracy Theory plus all tories are scum about this if I am honest....
..of course the BBCs not at all left leaning (cough). Broadcasting completley unsubstantiated shit with huge political implications isn't that far from hacking personal phone lines. If I was McAlpine I'd be going for millions and Schofield should apologise on air to the PM

Sorry Quids, but it wasn't very clear. I hadn't heard about the This Morning thing with Philip Schofield, and when I looked at your link it didn't mention him, that's why I was confused.


Anyway, I agree that he should at very least make an apology (as should his show producers), very misguided!


RE The BBC, obviously big errors have been made, but I'm not sure where the political bias you talk about is. They have made a huge hash of this though, particularly after last week, I am very surprised that anything on this subject was allowed to air without the green light from the very top, which I suspect it never had.

He should have resigned.


It took him just over three minutes to find the list of names online and, as a so called professional, it appears he didn't actually do any further research into these allegations/rumours.


Question, why pay him more than ?15,000 a year on such evidence? A trainee would't have done any worse.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • If you are against the increase in fuel duty then you are surly against fuel duty full stop.  It has not kept up with inflation, I'm talking about getting it back on track.  Ultimately road user charging is the solution. Labour will probably compromise on agricultural land inheritance by raising the cap so it generally catches the Clarksons of the world who are not bothered about profits from land beyond, in his case, income from a highly successful TV series and the great publicity for the farm shop and pub
    • Were things much simpler in the 80/90s? I remember both my girls belonging to a 6th Form Consortium which covered Sydenham Girls, Forest Hill Boys and Sedgehill off Bromley Road. A level classes were spread across the 3 schools - i remember Forest Hill boys coming to Sydenham Girls for one subject (think it was sociology or psychology ) A mini bus was provided to transport pupils to different sites, But I guess with less schools being 'managed' by the local authority, providers such as Harris etc have different priorities. 
    • There are teachers who have extensive experience of working with children with SEN but cannot access training to become SEN assessor (sorry cannot think of the correct title - senior moment ) as schools do not have the budget to undertake this. 
    • In certain cultures, it is the norm to have a period of singing at certain times after a death.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...