Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I regularly run elsewhere in East Dulwich, around 6am. My theory is that most muggers aren't up at that time. It may be naive theory, but so-far it's proved to be correct. I'd say you should be safe round DKH at that time.


However, never flash an iPod or iPhone, if you're running accompanied by music. Those armband holders are rather a foolish way of advertising your gadgets :-)

I was running back from Waterloo yesterday afternoon. Some of my workmates joked about whether it was safe running through south London. I causally cast aside such lazy stereotyping of my neighbourhood, only later to find my intended route (down Thurlow road) barred by copious amounts of police tape.

This probably proves that I'm not a good judge of these things, but for what its worth I still think running to denmark hill should be fine.

Sick of south London stereotypes. Is any large city safe to run in at any time? It's a matter of chance and bad timing if you run into a mugger or any other criminal activity. I wouldn't run through Hackney or Tottenham at 6am on a dark morning but maybe I'd consider Dulwich Village. Stereotypes work both ways.


Louisa.

I don't think it is sterotypical to worry about running in South London (or anywhere else in London) it can be quite rough and if it is still dark at 6am I wouldn't feel comfortable despite living around here all my life and being quite street wise. I think you have to be careful because people are often up and about at that time coming home from clubs or just hanging around! You do hear of stories about women runners being targeted. I would say go for it but just have your wits about you and stay away from any parks or woods

I run anywhere anytime, but am a large male!


I think on a dark morning at 6am you are fine on the streets, particularly busy ones. Parks might be a bit iffy at that time occasionally. Camberwell Grove is certainly safe as houses at that time. Only early morning commuters about. So if you stick to the main roads you'll be ok.

Nothing can be discounted off-hand, a woman runner was attacked in Dulwich Park on a weekday in mid-afternoon a few weeks ago, so a dark quiet area half-way to Camberwell is surely at least equally dangerous a location.

I'd say to my missus yeah go for it but as others have said, no headphones or gadgets, stick to popular roads and don't respond to distractions from people.

Not sure I agree with the 'ok for men, but take care ladies' view. In truth men are probably more likely to be victims of a violent street crime, but either way no one should feel scared at the prospect of walking (or running) the streets at 6 am.
There was a spate of people being mugged at cash points on Lordship Lane, (particularly remember the Barclays one) in the early hours of the morning. Presumably they were targeting people on their way to work. So yes, muggers are around at that time.

"Not sure I agree with the 'ok for men, but take care ladies' view"



Not what I'm saying. I'm saying my 5 year incident free experience of running early in the morning around here might be something to do with my size and appearance. But I'd say running at that time on main streets is fine.

I had been going out at 5.30am with my brother and dog until last week (when bro twisted his ankle) anyway, he must have looked like dog walker and me jogger. I was going on ahead to get car when I felt a 'presence'. In between us was a man walking maybe (IMHO) a little too fast, this was Friern Road btw.

I turned, looked at him, he then speedily entered a gateway, appeared to knock on a door then exited the path within a few seconds.

I found it very strange behaviour for 6.10am or anytime for that matter - as did my brother.

Nothing happened to either of us but the behaviour was just very edgy. And I am not suggesting anything was going to happen, it was just very strange that's all.


I would say leave it til after 6.45am when many more people are around and always be with someone.

Oh come off it you can run in to problems at any time of day whether it's dark or not. If you're concerned about safety you should either find a running buddy or just not go at all and continue to live in a bubble.


I get fed up of friends commenting they don't feel safe travelling here and there at such a such a time (grown adults!) especially when, compared to my travelling habits which are incredibly random, it's not particularly late.

You should always have your wits about you whether you're running, walking or skipping along a road.

womanofdulwich Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> http://www.jagssportsclub.co.uk/opening-hours.asp

>

> you could always run indoors -if you don't mind

> paying.



How much is this per month?

I've run around East Dulwich and the surrounds at 6am and as late as 8pm when it was dark and haven't felt in danger. I think it comes down to running in areas where it is well lit and not off the beaten track. I wouldn't go running around Dulwich Park or similar in the dark - I tend to stick to the main roads. If I didn't run in the dark I wouldn't get out between October and March.


rjsmall.

Dopamine1979 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Speaking of running can any avid joggers out there

> suggest a fairly quiet route from London Bridge to

> East Dulwich? Preferably avoiding Walworth

> road/Elephant and castle.


Easy. Head up to Peckham Library, down the Surrey Canal Path, over Burgess Park and either up the OKR or in parallel to it until you get to the Bricklayers Arms flyover. Under the underpass, up or in parallel to the road that leads you to Tower Bridge and then down the southbank to London Bridge.

taper Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dopamine1979 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Speaking of running can any avid joggers out

> there

> > suggest a fairly quiet route from London Bridge

> to

> > East Dulwich? Preferably avoiding Walworth

> > road/Elephant and castle.

>

> Easy. Head up to Peckham Library, down the Surrey

> Canal Path, over Burgess Park and either up the

> OKR or in parallel to it until you get to the

> Bricklayers Arms flyover. Under the underpass, up

> or in parallel to the road that leads you to Tower

> Bridge and then down the southbank to London

> Bridge.


Nice one. Thanks.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Money has to be raised in order to slow the almost terminal decline of public services bought on through years of neglect under the last government. There is no way to raise taxes that does not have some negative impacts / trade offs. But if we want public services and infrastructure that work then raise taxes we must.  Personally I'm glad that she is has gone some way to narrowing the inheritance loop hole which was being used by rich individuals (who are not farmers) to avoid tax. She's slightly rebalanced the burden away from the young, putting it more on wealthier pensioners (who let's face it, have been disproportionately protected for many, many years). And the NICs increase, whilst undoubtedly inflationary, won't be directly passed on (some will, some will likely be absorbed by companies); it's better than raising it on employees, which would have done more to depress growth. Overall, I think she's sailed a prudent course through very choppy waters. The electorate needs to get serious... you can't have European style services and US levels of tax. Borrowing for tax cuts, Truss style, it is is not. Of course the elephant in the room (growing ever larger now Trump is in office and threatening tariffs) is our relationship with the EU. If we want better growth, we need a closer relationship with our nearest and largest trading block. We will at some point have to review tax on transport more radically (as we see greater up take of electric vehicles). The most economically rational system would be one of dynamic road pricing. But politically, very difficult to do
    • Labour was right not to increase fuel duty - it's not just motorists it affects, but goods transport. Fuel goes up, inflation goes up. Inflation will go up now anyway, and growth will stagnate, because businesses will pass the employee NIC hikes onto customers.  I think farms should be exempt from the 20% IHT. I don't know any rich famers, only ones who work their fingers to the bone. But it's in their blood and taking that, often multi-generation, legacy out of the family is heart-breaking. Many work to such low yields, and yet they'll often still bring a lamb to the vet, even if the fees are more than the lamb's life (or death) is worth. Food security should be made a top priority in this country. And, even tho the tax is only for farms over £1m, that's probably not much when you add it all up. I think every incentive should be given to young people who want to take up the mantle. 
    • This link mau already have been posted but if not olease aign & share this petition - https://www.change.org/p/stop-the-closure-of-east-dulwich-post-office
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...