Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Any suggestions on how we make sure the Boris buses (that we are buying) run on east dulwich routes?


My vote would be for the 185 given the impending reduction of Denmark hill-Victoria trains.


A short background article : http://www.metro.co.uk/news/912712-london-to-get-600-new-boris-buses-but-taxpayers-will-foot-the-160m-bill

The fact that people feel that "they" are paying, so "their" area should have them is funny.


If any route gets one, I would like to see the 12 get it. Not that I have been on a 12 in the last few years, but it was one of the last route master routes. And the 36.

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The new 'routemasters' are awful. Please, no

> campaigning.



I agree. If there was a campaign to reinstate the old routemasters I'd sign up but the new ones are nothing special at all. I'd rather they concentrate on a better service to be honest.

the-e-dealer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No-one is proposing scrapping any buses. Unlike

> the huge loss made by retiring the bendy buses.



this



and the horrendous amount of money spent developing these new routemasters- double hit on the bus fares



way to go boris- thank god your tenure is about more than just vanity projects

I would campaign against the old Routemasters. They were a design classic but the seats were tiny and getting onto the platform was only for the fully mobile. I used to catch the old 12 for the whole route and on an almost daily basis the conductor would tell the driver to stop the engine because too many people had crammed on and no-one would would get off or there was an argument over fares.
176 or the 12 personally, although some of the buses used on the 185 are at least 10 years old as they were around from the London Easylink era of operation (They did briefly dissapear when Easylink went bust and every bus company in London including Arriva's sightseeing operation covered the route until East Thames Buses took over) and now running out of Go-Ahead/London Central's Camberwell garage.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • So Southwark in No Overall Control? Green / LD coalition?
    • Thanks for taking the trouble to do the calculation.  To be honest, it’s never occurred to me to report it online.  I’ll have to look into it.  I’ve just spoken to the ‘helpline’ and, after listening to ten minutes of some, admittedly, not too disagreeable jazz music, eventually got through to the call centre.  After a lot of to-ing and fro-ing, during which the operator was clearly reciting from a script, the essential question of why I continue to be billed by the RV method, despite their insistence on fitting a meter three years ago, went unresolved.  At first they couldn’t confirm whether I had a meter at all (not their department) but then agreed that I do have one but that it’s ’inactive’ (despite clearly recording usage as detailed above). I was told to contact the ‘meter department’ separately on a different number (Mon-Fri only) and was then asked if I wanted to sign up for various ‘pensioner’ benefits, none of which I understood (probably because I am a pensioner) before being asked to provide ‘feedback’, which I politely declined.  Looking forward to listening to some more jazz on Monday morning though.
    • That would be 78.231 m3, that is 78,231 liters.  The average water consumption per person in the UK is around 141 liters per day I believe.  So I'd say you're doing very well 👍 Have you tried to report your reading online?
    • Apart from potentially saving money (which TBF is more likely if there are fewer people living in your home) it is better for the environment to have a  water meter,  as you have an incentive to use less water. But roll on the re-nationalisation (is that a word?) of the water companies, before our green and pleasant land is covered with raw sewage. And so that the money from our water bills goes to improve the infrastructure rather than lining the pockets of already rich people. Vote Green! Ooops sorry, that's another thread.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...