Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Any suggestions on how we make sure the Boris buses (that we are buying) run on east dulwich routes?


My vote would be for the 185 given the impending reduction of Denmark hill-Victoria trains.


A short background article : http://www.metro.co.uk/news/912712-london-to-get-600-new-boris-buses-but-taxpayers-will-foot-the-160m-bill

The fact that people feel that "they" are paying, so "their" area should have them is funny.


If any route gets one, I would like to see the 12 get it. Not that I have been on a 12 in the last few years, but it was one of the last route master routes. And the 36.

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The new 'routemasters' are awful. Please, no

> campaigning.



I agree. If there was a campaign to reinstate the old routemasters I'd sign up but the new ones are nothing special at all. I'd rather they concentrate on a better service to be honest.

the-e-dealer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No-one is proposing scrapping any buses. Unlike

> the huge loss made by retiring the bendy buses.



this



and the horrendous amount of money spent developing these new routemasters- double hit on the bus fares



way to go boris- thank god your tenure is about more than just vanity projects

I would campaign against the old Routemasters. They were a design classic but the seats were tiny and getting onto the platform was only for the fully mobile. I used to catch the old 12 for the whole route and on an almost daily basis the conductor would tell the driver to stop the engine because too many people had crammed on and no-one would would get off or there was an argument over fares.
176 or the 12 personally, although some of the buses used on the 185 are at least 10 years old as they were around from the London Easylink era of operation (They did briefly dissapear when Easylink went bust and every bus company in London including Arriva's sightseeing operation covered the route until East Thames Buses took over) and now running out of Go-Ahead/London Central's Camberwell garage.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • This thread is about the father's ungenerous and snide reaction towards a pedestrian, into which his four-year-old collided. Not about whether said child should have been cycling on the pavement.  It's a thread about parenting so stop hijacking it, just so you can showcase, yet again, your vast and superior knowledge about roads, bikes, cars, driving, the law, pavements, ebikes, LTNs. PCNs, lanes, lines, speed limits, helmets, lights, dayglow, lycra etc etc etc. 
    • Children as young as 8, with a responsible adult, could and should be riding on the road if they are competent and confident.  Many from aged 9 onward get the chance to learn road riding skills at school and get out on the highway.  We should be normalising this.   Society, be it parents who are ultra-cautious, and many drivers who may see cyclists as a nuisance/inferior and worse still don't understand the rule of priority, and giving cyclists appropriate space, is the issue. Boroughs wide 20 mph are a great thing in this respect. It isn't legal for anyone to scoot or cycle on the pavement.  As you say police will not take any action against children, and some will argue here against any cyclist on the pavement. The latter part of the sentence is another issue.
    • EVs don't have to be huge, nor do ICE vechicles, but sadly many owners and drivers do choose heavy vehicles, egged on no doubt by manufacturers, influencers and the like, and a misguided view on road safety. As regards to 'safer' vehicles, the increase in weight goes back decades and is not a sudden thing.  Again 'safer' vehicles do not need to be huge. 
    • EVs don't have to be huge. I used to work for Th!nk in Norway. We put the battery under the seat & had a 2 + 2. It was also 98% recyclable & the first car that could communicate to with a phone. Sadly went into receivership in 2012. Note that we were developing a battery with Tesla in the early days but they pulled out as they didn't have the funding. Musk wasn't as much of an upstart in those days but we still thought he was a *fill this space with your own version* Crumple zones also don't have to be that big either, there are several small cars that meet the Euro N Cap rating. There is more danger in larger cars for pedestrian impact as they can damage vital organs or head injuries due to the height of the impact.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...