Jump to content

Recommended Posts

They want another bailout


https://www.standard.co.uk/news/transport/tfl-second-government-bailout-coronavirus-a4507591.html


"TfL also warned they needed to be ?realistic? about what major future projects will be affordable over the next decade including the proposed DLR extension to Thamesmead, the Bakerloo extension and Crossrail 2."


Rather unsurprisingly the Bakerloo line extension down Old Kent Road is now considered vulnerable.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/258864-tfl-end-of-bakerloo-extension/
Share on other sites

I guess the buck stops with the mayor on this but suspect he will weasel his way out again.


Maybe it's time to realise that a mayor of London and all the associated officers / support staff is just another level of bureaucracy and associated costs that could be put to better use by funding projects and not "middle managers"

Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Maybe it's time to realise that a mayor of London

> and all the associated officers / support staff is

> just another level of bureaucracy and associated

> costs that could be put to better use by funding

> projects and not "middle managers"


Do you have any figures of the costs saved to support your statement?...

Nope

But if you look at the cost of renting city hall (?11.1 million a year source : https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/jun/24/sadiq-khan-proposes-moving-city-hall-to-east-london-to-cut-costs ) and other factors like mayor and assembly members costs (approx ?1.7 million a year source : https://www.london.gov.uk//about-us/governance-and-spending/spending-money-wisely/salaries-expenses-benefits-and-workforce-information) then add expenses and staff costs then the numbers start to stack up quickly. (Sorry I don't have the time to do all the maths but someone can and I bet it's a fair sum)


Seems an awful lot of money for a set of middle management between local councils and the government possibly with a lot of job replication between at least two of the organisations and makes sense of why the GLA was disbanded in my mind as that money could be put to better use by funding actual projects 😱

I don't think the numbers do stack up when it comes to project funding, those sums won't get you much. Had you pointed the finger at the waste of tax payers' money on mayoral vanity projects e.g. Johnson's Garden Bridge (?53m) then you would have a better argument, but even then that's down to the mayor rather than the office of mayor. There needs to be more accountability when public money is thrown away like that...
You are right DR that's why I'm saying the role of mayor and the Assembly should be abolished as all mayors have their vanity projects (or cancel others) and the cost of having a mayor and all the supporting staff can't be justified when the money spent on roles, expenses, property could be used (as an example ) to fight knife crime by the police 😃

Abe_froeman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The mayor is already responsible for policing and

> knife crime though, as well as tfl.

>

> These are literally 90 per cent of his job remit!


Blimey, he's even a lot more useless than I thought

Abe_froeman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The mayor is already responsible for policing and

> knife crime though, as well as tfl.

>

> These are literally 90 per cent of his job remit!


As Meatloaf sang "two out of three ain't bad" unless, as in this case, the two have been poorly managed

  • 2 months later...

The Bakerloo line extension hasn't been added to the wishlist for funding (CSR submission to government). Kicks the project into the long grass (along with all the other proposed Bakerloo line extensions over the last 100 years I guess)


https://www.southwarknews.co.uk/news/bakerloo-line-extension-tfl-says-its-not-realistic-to-expect-government-to-fund-extension-soon/

Why does this forum, which I expect is generally populated by intelligent people, always degrade to a soapbox to throw rocks at the Mayor?


London has one of the best and cheapest public transport networks in the country. In recent times helped by innovation (Oyster, and then contactless), more joined up networks, increased patronage (OK that hasn't survived Covid).


It takes heaps of money, and we are only in this enviable position due to central government subsidy. All the Mayors have made mistakes - Livingstone promising conductors on our buses, 40p/70p outer and inner fares and the silly bendy buses - but boy did he modernise things, Johnson allowing the capital grant to be given up and his expensive and unnecessary new Routemasters, and Khan (see above).


But do you have a good thing to say about the latter or will it just continue to be a whingefest?

mrwb Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This crisis would have crippled TFL no matter how

> it was run.

>

> The fact it was already a totally inefficient

> shambles has made things worse.


This is, of course, complete rubbish. TfL gets one of the lowest level of subsidy of any large city's transport networks, and makes most of its money on passenger fares - and yet the passenger fares are still very reasonable.

Compared to where? In the UK it is (or maybe was) disproportionately subsidised by central government. Compared to many big cities in Europe it is less well supported.


Crofton Park to Swanley ?2.90 11 miles in the Oyster Zone

Crofton Park to Eynsford ?7.70 one stop after Swanley, outside the Zone

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Compared to where? In the UK it is (or maybe was)

> disproportionately subsidised by central

> government. Compared to many big cities in Europe

> it is less well supported.

>

> Crofton Park to Swanley ?2.90 11 miles in the

> Oyster Zone

> Crofton Park to Eynsford ?7.70 one stop after

> Swanley, outside the Zone


Compared to the tax Londoners and London businesses pay ? I'm sure London subsidises the rest of the UK.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I think it's connected with the totem pole renovation celebrations They have passed now, but the notice has been there since then (at least that's when I first saw it - I passed it on the 484 and also took a photo!)
    • Labour was damned, no matter what it did, when it came to the budget. It loves go on about the black hole, but if Labour had had its way, we'd have been in lockdown for longer and the black hole would be even bigger.  Am I only the one who thinks it's time the NHS became revenue-generating? Not private, but charging small fees for GP appts, x-rays etc? People who don't turn up for GP and out-patient appointments should definitely be charged a cancellation fee. When I lived in Norway I got incredible medical treatment, including follow up appointments, drugs, x-rays, all for £200. I was more than happy to pay it and could afford to. For fairness, make it somehow means-tested.  I am sure there's a model in there somewhere that would be fair to everyone. It's time we stopped fetishising something that no longer works for patient or doctor.  As for major growth, it's a thing of the past, no matter where in the world you live, unless it's China. Or unless you want a Truss-style, totally de-regulated economy and love capitalism with a large C. 
    • If you read my post I expect a compromise with the raising of the cap on agricultural property so that far less 'ordinary' farmers do not get caught  Clarkson is simply a high profile land owner who is not in the business as a conventional farmer.  Here's a nice article that seems to explain things well  https://www.sustainweb.org/blogs/nov24-farming-budget-inheritance-tax-apr/ It's too early to speculate on 2029.  I expect that most of us who were pleased that Labour got in were not expecting anything radical. Whilst floating the idea of hitting those looking to minimise inheritance tax, including gifting, like fuel duty they also chickened put. I'm surprised that anyone could start touting for the Tories after 14 years of financial mismanagement and general incompetence. Surly not.  A very low bar for Labour but they must be well aware that there doesn't need to be much of a swing form Reform to overturn Labour's artificially large majority.  But even with a generally rabid right wing press, now was the opportunity to be much braver.
    • And I worry this Labour government with all of it's own goals and the tax increases is playing into Farage's hands. With Trump winning in the US, his BFF Farage is likely to benefit from strained relations between the US administration and the UK one. As Alastair Campbell said on a recent episode of The Rest is Politics who would not have wanted to be a fly on the wall of the first call between Angela Rayner and JD Vance....those two really are oil and water. Scary, scary times right now and there seems to be a lack of leadership and political nous within the government at a time when we really need it - there aren't many in the cabinet who you think will play well on the global stage.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...