Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Ben and Jerrys Cookie Dough ice cream ingredients:


Ingredients: Cream (27%), water, condensed skimmed milk, sugar*, wheat flour, brown sugar*, free range egg yolk, milk fat, soybean oil, egg, vegetable fat, cocoa mass*, fat reduced cocoa powder*, vanilla extract*,molasses, stabilisers (guar gum, carrageenan), salt, natural butter flavouring, cocoa butter*, natural vanilla flavouring, natural brown sugar flavour with other natural flavourings, emulsifier (soya lecithin), coffee extract*.


Muck.

BrandNewGuy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ben and Jerrys Cookie Dough ice cream

> ingredients:

>

> Ingredients: Cream (27%), water, condensed skimmed

> milk, sugar*, wheat flour, brown sugar*, free

> range egg yolk, milk fat, soybean oil, egg,

> vegetable fat, cocoa mass*, fat reduced cocoa

> powder*, vanilla extract*,molasses, stabilisers

> (guar gum, carrageenan), salt, natural butter

> flavouring, cocoa butter*, natural vanilla

> flavouring, natural brown sugar flavour with other

> natural flavourings, emulsifier (soya lecithin),

> coffee extract*.

>

> Muck.



If it's muck, it's damned good muck.

Unusually, I'm with Huguenot on this one. There's nothing whatsoever in there that classifies it as muck.


Milk, cream, eggs, sugar = the custard ice cream is made from.


The cocoa and fats would make up the cookie dough.


Is it the emulsifier and stabilisers you have a problem with? Well sheesh, I'd hate to see the response on here if someone were to buy an ice cream from a name manufacturer and it split.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Which ingredient is muck BNG?

> You've got your standard ice cream, plus the

> flavours for cookies and vanilla.


Soybean oil? Vegetable fat?


> What's your problem? And, God bless, what are you

> getting so angry about?


There's no problem. I thought I answered your condescending comment in a straightforward way, but hey ho.


> Bizarre.


Right.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Janda Diner (Malaysian) got a glowing review in the Times at the weekend. https://www.thetimes.com/life-style/food-drink/article/janda-diner-peckham-review-i-needed-it-to-deliver-and-it-did-vchsxc9gx
    • Has anyone had any joy getting refunds for their cancelled kids' swimming lessons? I am constantly just getting a 'computer says no' response from Dulwich Leisure - quite how they think its okay to charge £42.40 per child without a service being given is beyond me! I will try emailing Portia too...
    • Just to clarify, this isn't the same cherry as last year, it's in the corner by the path that runs down to the crossroads of FHR / Colyton / Dunstans. It hasn't been an issue previously because the perimeter wasn't as large... I'm sure it must have been noticed & flagged during the various planning meetings, walkabouts etc and there is an ecological resolution planned that will avoid any damage to the tree. After all, Gala pride themselves on their environmental stance, being "nestled in the park" and everything... 🤦
    • Those branches are going to get chopped...again. All of this shows the central paradox at the heart of Southwark's greening the streets policy. What is the good of planting trees in tarmac if you are simultaneously wrecking large sections of the park and stopping locals using the park? It just does not make sense. Cllr Catherine Rose should be made to answer for Gala conduct, if they are already flouting the terms of their agreement.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...