Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi there,


From October I need to observe a baby for one hour a week as part of my Child Psychotherapy MA.


The baby needs to be as close to birth as possible and younger than a month old.


The baby needs to be oberved for a minimum of 40 weeks per year for two years from birth to two years old. I would like to arrange a regular time, one hour per week to observe mum and baby together. The focus of this part of my course is to observe the development of parent - infant interaction over time. On occasions it would be required to see how the baby interacts with other important people, like Dad or siblings.


A little about me: My name is Sarah, I am 25 years old and currently studying part time for an MA Integrative Child Psychotherapy at IATE (http://www.artspsychotherapy.org/artschild-psychotherapy/child-therapy/87).

I have a background in Fine Art and work part time in a local school 1:1 with special needs children. I have several CRB checks the most recent being September 2012 which I am more than happy to share with any family that may be willing to invite me into their home.


If you are interested or would like further information please dont hesitate to message me.


Look forward to hearing from you

Sarah

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I guess we'll have to take their word for it! 🍔🙏 😁
    • Does anyone have any knowledge as to who (if any) is taking over the old Poundland unit in Lordship Lane? 
    • 100% agree and eloquently put. Trump's lawsuit will go nowhere. He can't sue in the UK as he is out of time and the bbc would have a case to countersue given all the times he has lied about the BBC. A court in Florida will have no jurisdiction in the UK and he would still have to prove malice and reputational damage. Well he won the elction so there's no argument on damage there. The program was not broadcast in the US, so very few if any people saw it. His entire speech is readily available to view elsewhere anyway. And on reputation, does he really want all the facts dragged out as you have listed them above? In what world does Trump thinks that leaves him with a good reputation that someone else could damage? It will go nowhere, like so many of his other lawsuits and court actions. The BBC should hold firm. A more curious question though is why the Telegraph waited until now to do their predictable mischief?   Agreed. To downplay the state murder of a journalist, in an embassy on foreign soil of all places, because he was 'not liked' by a lot of people, is just ludicrous and offensive. Compare that to his narrative around the murder of Charlie Kirk, who was also not liked by a lot of people. Trump is playing his guest as always, but it shows just how morally spineless he really is. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...