Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi there,


From October I need to observe a baby for one hour a week as part of my Child Psychotherapy MA.


The baby needs to be as close to birth as possible and younger than a month old.


The baby needs to be oberved for a minimum of 40 weeks per year for two years from birth to two years old. I would like to arrange a regular time, one hour per week to observe mum and baby together. The focus of this part of my course is to observe the development of parent - infant interaction over time. On occasions it would be required to see how the baby interacts with other important people, like Dad or siblings.


A little about me: My name is Sarah, I am 25 years old and currently studying part time for an MA Integrative Child Psychotherapy at IATE (http://www.artspsychotherapy.org/artschild-psychotherapy/child-therapy/87).

I have a background in Fine Art and work part time in a local school 1:1 with special needs children. I have several CRB checks the most recent being September 2012 which I am more than happy to share with any family that may be willing to invite me into their home.


If you are interested or would like further information please dont hesitate to message me.


Look forward to hearing from you

Sarah

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Comparing to Week 11 last season, the table is a lot more compact, even the distance between top and bottom is half of what it was when RC was a runaway leader on 90+ points. Also worth remembering there are 25 or so game weeks left, so any points difference can slowly be eroded away. Week 11 points...   Week 11 table....      
    • Some people don’t like it, some people will love it.  It doesn’t bother me at all. In fact I quite like it. I do not like assumptions you make about ‘elderly people’. 
    • This concerns me as it essentially disregards the significant number of people who do experience a high level of disruption because of the event.  While it's great that you personally are not inconvenienced, this is absolutely not the case for a great many residents many of whom are elderly or who do not have private gardens and rely on the park.   Great that you have a PHD in ecology but might also be worth reading the report into the environmental impact of Gala which paints a rather different story to yours. This comes round every year with a request to extend. This seems to me to be a distraction to steer everyone away from the main event. However, Southwark Council and Councillor Catherine Rose in particular must bear responsibility for what is effectively privatisation of our community space.  I requested data on the results of the last consultations and had to use a subject access request to get it.  In 2024 the council received 111 responses of which 108 were negative. The event went ahead. Last year they received 136 of which 82 were negative and 34 said only with major changes (which did not happen).   The impact of the event on the community and the enviroment is well-documented.  The council has so far refused to supply data on the demographics of the attendees but it doesn't take much to work out that this is largely single under 30s from out of borough judging by the steady stream of people from the station.   Please do take time to protest and also to email Events as we try to hold the council accountable for their disregard of the public consultation results. Appendix 1.pdf 2025 consultation.pdf
    • 2 x 2 cubes if anyone has one going 🙏 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...