Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Has anybody else noticed a pattern of driving styles on the different buses? 63 drivers seem in general a calm and steady bunch but I've always found the 176 drivers to be frustrated boy racers who aim for maximum acceleration between stops, making for a lurchy ride.
The 12 and the 63, 263, 197 can get caught up in Peckham, where the police and the usually super-efficient traffic wardens don't ticket the lorries and minivans that quite often park on the yellow lines. When there is a jam it can take a looooong time for the buses to get through. Nero

The 12 can also be a nightmare around waterloo/westminster. Took me 2 hours once from the Plough to Piccadilly... made me late for the theatre grrrrrr!


I have noticed the 176 in the evenings (from say 8pm) to be more frequent travel through ED lately. Maybe Arriva have more drivers at the Norwood Garage these days ;-)

Nero Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The 12 and the 63, 263, 197 can get caught up in

> Peckham, where the police and the usually

> super-efficient traffic wardens don't ticket the

> lorries and minivans that quite often park on the

> yellow lines. When there is a jam it can take a

> looooong time for the buses to get through. Nero


Nero, you must have been on one of the same buses as me this morning! Two number 12 buses both tried to overtake vans parked on the double yellows at the same time and got "locked" with no room for either to get round their respective obstable or each other. 20 mins of reversing/forward 2" or so, and lots of folding mirrors in - finally resolved by one of the van drivers being located and made to move his van a bit further onto the pavement to give the bendy bit of the bus a chance to move through. Poor driving all round, but actually quite funny once I'd reconciled myself to running late...

KK - The 12 goes from Whitehall and Regent Street. Hop on at the start of the journey and you'll get a seat. I hate the 666 (my preferred name for the 176) too. A few years ago the buses were like something out of the 20s - wooden, grooved floors and scratchy seat fur. Nero
  • 4 months later...

Quick question, and this seems like the most relevant thread to ask it!


Need to head into Dulwich next week on the 176, been told by a friend to meet up at the Dulwich Harvester bus stop, somewhere between East Dulwich and Forest Hill... does anyone know the "proper" name for this stop, ie that I can find on TFL bus route maps etc? Anyone know the approximate time for the 176 to get to the Harvester from Waterloo in the early evening?


Much obliged for all help...

  • 2 weeks later...

I have been travelling on the 176 for about 3 years now because I just couldn't cope with the cattle truck conditions on the trains.

I catch the bus near Lawrie Park Road SE20 and travel to the Strand End of Waterloo Bridge. I actually need to go to Tottencourt Road but unfortunately the amount of time it takes the bus to travel along the Strand and around Trafalgar Square, it it quicker for me to get off at Waterlool Bridge and walk through Covent Garden.


I have nothing but contempt for Arriva buses who refuse to take any complaints seriously. Over the years I have complained about:

Heaters being left on in the summer

Heaters being left off in the winter

Drivers not alerting passengers about diversions or temporary closure of bus stops

Journeys being curtailed without notice

When the journeys are curtailed the driver refuses to provide tickets for the next bus

Drivers never explaining why the journey have been curtailed.

Changing drivers half way round the route and having to wait for the new driver. Why isn't the new driver waiting at the bus stop?

I am also concerned the TFL seem to spend most of their time defending the totally inadequate bus companies instead of defending the passengers they are supposed to represent.

Despite my complaints all the above continue to happen despite assurances for TFL and Arriva.


Things will only get worse now that Ken Livingstone is no longer Mayor. What worries me is that when Boris removes all the bendy buses (I am no lover of them myself but see them as a necessary evil) and replaces them with traditional buses, where will all the drivers come from. I see cuts to routes coming.


I also believe things will only get worse now that Boris has taken over. I remember Margaret Thatcher saying that anyone over 35 who catches a bus is a failure.


If Boris wants people to get out of cars and onto buses he must improve the service but I suppose he has other priorities like looking after his friends with their ?70.000 Range Rovers who live in the West of London.

176depressive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Things will only get worse now that Ken

> Livingstone is no longer Mayor. What worries me

> is that when Boris removes all the bendy buses (I

> am no lover of them myself but see them as a

> necessary evil) and replaces them with traditional

> buses, where will all the drivers come from. I see

> cuts to routes coming.

>

> I also believe things will only get worse now that

> Boris has taken over. I remember Margaret

> Thatcher saying that anyone over 35 who catches a

> bus is a failure.

>

> If Boris wants people to get out of cars and onto

> buses he must improve the service but I suppose he

> has other priorities like looking after his

> friends with their ?70.000 Range Rovers who live

> in the West of London.


Hello and welcome to the EDF 176.


Why do you reckon that 'bendies' are a necessary evil. Why were they necessary in the first place?

If it's about wheelchair/pram access, I think that was taken care of with the modern double-deckers.

Where will all the drivers come from? Thebendies presumably.

Why will things get worse under Boris? Why would the improved bus service that Livingstone brought about be ruined by Johnson?

Why would he do that? He seems to be going out of his way to be populist. His recent sackings have indicated a certain craveness on his part, that he should watch I think.

Just getting back to buses, it was livingstone who said something along the lines of 'only a souless moron would get rid of the Routemaster' I paraphrase, but that was the gist. He then proceeded to... well you know.


I trust Johnson as much as I trusted Livingston. Never voted for either one, as I went for more 'left-field' candidates.

Wait and see what Johnson actually does about transport, before you make judgements.

Sorry that makes me sound bossy, doesn't it?


Anyway, welcome and get on the Song Game and Word Association threads, they're bundles of fun. Honest.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...