Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Does anyone know why the 176 bus has stopped going through to Waterloo in the morning? This has really messed with my journey to work. I have e-mailed Tfl customer services to complain at [email protected] but don't know if they will bother to respond or if they are the best people to have a go at.


Has anyone else been affected by this, if so do you know who it is best to complain to?


Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2572-176-bus-lounged/
Share on other sites

I recieve daily travel news from TFL and this bit has been mentioned everyday for quite some time...


"NEW OXFORD STREET 25MAY CE07349

NEW OXFORD STREET: Until 2359 Sunday 25 May 2008, Routes 1 7 8 10 14 19 24 25 29 38 55 73 98 134 176 242 390 N1 N5 N7 N8 N10 N19 N20 N29 N35 N38 N41 N55 N68 N73 N98 N171 N207 N253 and N279 are subject to delays due to rebuilding works at Tottenham Court Road station causing lane restrictions. At times, these works will require stop closures and/or diversions."


Perhaps this may explain the early termination of the route.

Having just moved back to ED after years away I thought with Ken's new pro bus transport policy there would be millions of buses. Unfortunately it's still the same as it was. My wife has to get the 176 to the Strand which is rubbish and last week I had the bright idea of getting the Northern Line to Oval and hopping on a 185 to Dulwich Hamlet FC.. I walked to Camberwell and got a 40, not a single bus of any number passed me.

The 176 service had got a hell of a lot better than it was before the Ken improvements (I once waited over two hours in the early evening for a bus back from Charing Cross Road to ED).


But I agree it's got worse again recently, it's terminating early in both directions, and that stop to change drivers is particularly irritating in the morning when I'm trying to get to work.


But on balance I'd still rather sit on a bus - even with a long journey time - than be crammed onto rush hour trains/tubes.... it's cheaper, too :)


EDIT


I once had an occasional job mystery travelling for London Buses, and it was very noticeable how much quicker my day finished when the post-Ken timetables came in - very definitely the buses were much more frequent than they had been before.

436 goes Paddington-Lewisham, 36 goes from Queens Park (Kilburn) to somewhere else (Crystal Palace?) via Oval and Camberwell.


The 436 is, despite being bendy, probably the quickest way to get from South-East London to Paddington and, given the way the new plans for Crossrail meticulously avoid being useful, and the Cross-River Partnership's exciting Cross-River Tram won't actually cross the river (crusty old-timers tell me there was a tram tunnel beneath the Thames somewhere near Waterloo, but it seems the authorities have lost it), it's likely to stay that way.


Since Livingstone's been mayor, the bus subsidy has increased from ?50m quid per year to well over ?500m, so it's hardly surprising there are more of them.

Ah yes - I've never tried the 436, always go to Elephant and take the bakerloo


Anyway, back on topic... I think the 176 is pretty good. I always find it regular (apart from waiting at Aldwych at night - the loneliest bus stop in the world?). Oh and the fact it blatantly drove past a few of us the other night because (I think) the driver was too busy paying attention to overtaking a car. Or he just couldn't be bothered to do a tedious thing like actually stop at a bus stop and let passengers on. Er, so maybe it's not so great after all...

Nero Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The 666 on the way back after 9pm is OK. On the

> way into work it's poor. 63 is the way to go.

> Aldwych bus stop is underpopulated queue-wise, but

> the one at Somerset House gets busy with nary a

> civilised line to be had. Nero


@@@@@@@@@@@@@


666??


There isn't really a 666 bus route, is there??


:))


Oh, erm, duh sorry yeh you mean the 176 innit :-$:-$:-$

I know it's frustrating when routes terminate early, but to be honest I always found that 176 bit from the Strand to Oxford St tortuous, particularly after Trafalgar Square was part-pedestrianised. On a good day i could get to aldwych from goose green in 30 mins and it would take another 30 to get from strand to tottentham Court Rd. Even though 176 stopped right outside my office i usually got off on strand and walked thru covent garden. Much better for the heart and soul.

Going to work I get the 176 (or 40) to Elephant, then get the Bakerloo Line to Piccadilly Circus... but get the 176 home as I work late.


I waited 45 minutes tonight. With the flu. Am not pleased. I swear it's getting worse night by night.


And what's wrong with it on Saturdays?! I have to leave at noon to get to Soho for 2pm because there are just no buses! And when they do arrive they usually terminate in Camberwell or just take forever...!


I have a lot of built up hate for that bus. Handy at 3am. Not any other hour of the day.

I used to catch the 176 up to Oxford Street every Monday morning, complete and utter nightmare! I switched to using the 12 (bendy bus that goes down Barry Rd, through Peckham, past Westminster) and found it much better. It certainly seemed quicker on the way there, but on the way home I used to get off at Camberwell and switch to a bus that took the direct route past Denmark Hill rather than through Peckham as for some reason it was a lot slower in reverse.


The best thing about the 12 was that I used to get on at one of the first stops and always got the single seat right at the front, public transport luxury!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Another recommendation - excellent, fast work. 
    • I appealed against a fine issued by Southwark, and won. The adjudicator was businesslike, but also mentioned that several cases had come to him caught out by the same confusing signage.    Is there any other parking that could reasonably have been used? Does the shop advise where to park?  It sounds as though the time in the bay was a reasonable use. Even if you lose, I doubt that Southwark can increase the original charge. If you are going to appeal, don't delay. Take pictures of the scene if you think that might help, also provide the weight of the goods if that supports your case.
    • Thanks - an overnight stay,  a drip and painkillers seems to have done its work!
    • Depends on who can afford to purchase or lease it and what The Dulwich Estate, Stonegate and Southwark Council will allow to be built or operate on the site. Whatever it is, it needs to attract footfall for itself and businesses around it. The question to ask is what does that part of Dulwich need, that is not within the locality, which will attract custom and footfall, that the site can accommodate and that can offer parking which it already has available. In between Cox's Walk, Dulwich Village, Dulwich College and the park, some sort of establishment that sells drinks and meals. Bit then I'm just chucking ideas around, or maybe someone, Dean, has some radical idea's to take it in a totally different direction.    Whatever it becomes it has to be better than the rotting site and eyesore it currently is. Good luck to anyone who takes on the project to redevelop the former Grove Tavern. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...