Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi,


I was just wondering if anyone has had any experience of having a home birth with the King's College East Team? I had my booking appointment the other day and they were very positive and encouraging about home birthing, but the first-hand experiences I can find on the internet seem to be people who've been with one of the "caseload" services. I'd just really be interested to hear about what it's like if you opt for a home birth with the East Team, and whether you'd recommend it.


Thanks!

Hi ecg


I had a home birth with East Team for my first child. It was a last minute decision so I maybe met them 4 days before he was born (however he was 3 weeks early) and they came round to my house and had a chat and left a box of goodies at my place that they'd need for the birth.


I was very lucky in that I had a quick easy labour (well as easy as labour gets) and they were fab. One midwife came and checked me and when she realised things were moving along quickly and I told her I wanted to give birth in the pool she quickly got another midwife to join her (there needs to be 2 midwives for a water birth) and they stayed with me until feeding was going well and we were comfortable.


Couldn't recommend them high enough. Didn't have them for 2nd home birth as we had moved to ED (from Herne Hill) and I was lucky enough to be in the Oakwood midwives practice.


Good luck and I hope you have as easy a labour as possible. If you have any other questions please just ask.


Sally

I had an East team midwife for my second baby, 1st homebirth. It was my best experience of the four. They were so helpful, attentive and friendly. I met all 6(?) of the midwives during my pregnancy, but was lucky enough to get my favourite on the day. Then afterwards they were the midwives that came postnatally too. I think you'll be in good hands with East team.
I had a home birth with them (first baby), very happy and it all went smoothly. I met two of the team during my antenatal care but neither were on call the evening I delivered. I didn't find that a problem. The two midwives who came were professional and supportive. The post natal care was good and they identified my daughter's tongue tie early.

I had my second child, first home bith, with the east team this March and had a wonderful experience.

I was fortunate that Frances came to do my booking at home and was then on duty when I went into labour so they matched her to me, she was excellent. She also did the majority of my follow ups which made life after the birth so much more pleasant and easier(not having to repeat birth story etc).

I cannot speak highly enough of the care, attention and support given from both Frances and Nicki, during labour/delivery and immediately afterwards. They were instrumental in my second birth being an amazing experience, in my opinion I would say go for it, if you have any last minute doubts/niggles you can always change your mind.

Melissa

  • 4 weeks later...

I was wondering whether anyone could give me some recommendations/feedback on the east team and the lanes midwives? This is my first pregnancy and I'm quite new to everything and slightly nervous. I would prefer to have a continuous service with one midwife throughout the pregnancy and not sure if this is possible with either midwife centre. It would be good to hear any feedback or experience - good/bad regarding the two midwife centres.


thanks

Hi!

This is a thread I feel really passionate about...

We were with the Kings East Homebirth team and I had a fabulous midwife the whole way through my pregnancy. Like dtoh, I was also concerned about 'midwife lotto' not knowing who we would get, so we organised a close friend to come along as a support person (non-medical, just to help out, make tea, support my husband etc). This was really useful, as it minimised the 'not knowing' aspect about who would be involved.


As luck would have it, my midwife was on call when I went in to labour and she was with us at home. I had a super quick labour (six hours) and she decided I needed to be transeferred to Kings, and bubba came an hour later - my midwife stayed to deliver him. We were discharge shortly afterwards - so only in hospital for a few hours!


While my hospital experience was very positive - the comfort of being at home for the labour was terrific. Definately recommend it. Happy to talk privately too. PM me.


NOTE: being at home can be a little distracting too... my husband nipped off for ten minutes to make and consume a pizza (I was about 8 cm dilated at the time) (!!) Another friend said she caught hers watching tele.


Hmmmm


KWB

Hi again,

I have just found a flow chart I put together based on information I was given by the East Team at Kings. I did this so I understood the processes and 'system' in place.


(DISCLAIMER: Please note that this is NOT produced by Kings - it is a personal account only).


My journey was the one on the left-hand side: waters broke 5pm, went into labour 11pm, baby heart rate a bit iffy -transferred to Kings at 4am, baby delivered naturally no issues at 5am. Job done. : )

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Good advice Kipper!  The 1.0 early Ecoboost and 1.2 Puretech engines have wet cam belts that fail and failure with a cam belt invariably result in catastrophic  damage to valves and pistons. Later ones were changed to chains. Avoid at all costs!
    • Sorry. Link wasn't working on my phone, but it is now, and I couldn't delete the post.
    • Sent you a pm
    • I think there's a fair number of "participating" sub offices that do passports or, at least, play the "check and send" game (£16 for glancing at your form), so some degree of cherry-picking seems to be permitted. Though it does look as if Post Offices "Indentity Services" are where it things the future lies, and "Right to Rent" (though it's more an eligibility check) looks a bit of an earner, along with DBS checks and the Age Verification services that, if the government gets its way, we'll all need to subscribe to before we're allowed on mumsnet. Those services, incidentally, seem mostly outsourced to an outfit called "Yoti", a privately-owned, loss-making "identity platform" with debts of £150m, a tardy approach to filings, and a finger in a bunch of questionable pies ("Passive Facial Liveness Recognition" sounds gloriously sinister) so what the Post Office gets out of the arrangement isn't clear, but I'm sure they think it worthwhile. That said, they once thought the same of funeral plans which, for some peculiar reason, failed to set fire to the shuffling queues, even metaphorically. For most, it seems, Post Office work is mostly a dead loss, and even the parcel-juggling is more nuisance than blessing. As a nonchalant retailer of other people's services the organisation can only survive now on the back of subsidies, and we're not even sure what they are. The taxpayer-funded subsidies from government (a £136m hand-out to keep Horizon going, £1bn for its compensation scheme, around £50m for the network, and perhaps a loan or two) are clearish, but the cross-subsidies provided by other retail activities in branches are murkier. As are the "phantom shortfalls" created by the Horizon system, which secretly lined Post Office's coffers as postmasters balanced the books with contributions from their own pockets. Those never showed up in the accounts though - because Horizon *was* the accounting system - so we can't tell how much of a subsidy that was. We might get an idea of the scale, however, from Post Office's belated Horizon Shortfall Scheme, which is handing £75k to every branch that's complained, though it's anyone's guess if that's fair or not. Still, that's all supposed to be behind us now, and Post Office's CEO-of-the-week recently promised an "extra" £250m a year for the branches (roughly enough to cover a minimum wage worker in each), which might make it worth the candle for some. Though he didn't expect that would happen before 2030 (we can only wonder when his pension will mature) and then it'd be "subject to government funding", so it might have to be a very short candle as it doesn't look like a promise that he can make. Still, I wouldn't want to discourage anyone from applying for a franchise, and it's possible that, this time, Post Office will be telling the truth. And, you never know, we might all be back in the Post Office soon, and eagerly buying stamps, if only for existence permits, rather than for our letters.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...