Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Kidkruger - Your post is as unhelpful and as full of assumptions as those defending the protesters.


I'm interested that having seen pictures of the protests yesterday on twitter, there were a lot of middle aged mothers standing outside that shop. I don't think that's a group that would protest without consideration just to go along with a mob mentality.


There may be some unsavoury elements creeping into the protest- ignorant banners and racist shouts - but I think there could definitely be two sides to this story.

Bellenden Belle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Kidkruger - Your post is as unhelpful and as full

> of assumptions as those defending the protesters.

>

>

and when taken with the rest of KK's contribution on this thread (s)he's clearly (and maybe proudly) racist/ignorant/illogical

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How can you say KK is racist from what he has

> said? It's not like the shop keepers he's

> supporting are white British skin heads is it.

>

> Stupid unnecessary comment.



he assumes (without any facts that he's willing to share):


that the victim of a beating is a "wannabe gangster who's never worked for anything himself"


that "profiling" black people (seemingly as a whiole) as the perpetrators of crime is reasonable and that it's useful to ask khan's which group they get "poncing, thieving and intimidation from" (again assuming that it reasonable to make generalisations about ethnic groups


that "basically some bruvvas tried to bully the Khan's staff and got owned, they're used to getting their way through rough talk and intimidation but they fell short this time" and "brought-up on gangster hip-hop and dominating people"


and in general there's a general refusal to believe any allegations made by black people here (given the above stereotypes) even tho he doesn't claim to know any facts


if think that racism must be associated with supporting "white british skinheads" may be you're pretty naive yourself

Well come on - what REALLY happened in the 'event' which the initial posters were trying to portray as unprovoked 'racist' attacks on poor innocent lads just trying to get a fair deal.

The guys in Khans have a different story, ask them yourself if you are interested.

The point I'm making all along is that the race card is being played right from the start.

If there was any hidings they weren't for nowt. There was at very least some build-up and history.

Earlier I said there was more to this story - I'm glad BB now recognises this may be the case.

There's assumptions being made all over the place, surely I'm allowed a couple myself you big dafties, but no it's so much cheaper to play the card innit !

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There's assumptions being made all over the place,

> surely I'm allowed a couple myself


you say "assumption", i say "prejudice"


either way it seems that you admit you've drawn your conclusions without much reference to "facts"


-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm intrigued that it's ME who's a racist !!


there needn't be only one set of prejudiced people here

I just want to say that when I was talking to some of the protesters, who were mainly middle aged women as Bellenden Belle has stated, I didn't hear or see any of the racist placards or shouts mentioned above.


I'd be interested to see some evidence of that.


The pecking order of immigrants mentioned above is exactly what I think is happening in Peckham Rye, plus the fact (from one of the shopkeepers own account) that people who used to give other Asian shopkeepers trouble didn't understand that they are Afghan and always fight back.


That is fair enough, I would never advocate taking crap from anyone, but it is my understanding that after the big battle last year between the Afghan shopkeepers and the Peckham Youths gang, the Peckham Rye shopkeepers have taken the tacit approval of the police as permission to continue to inflict violence on black youths as a whole, which is out of order and needs to be stopped.

There are some troubling parallels here with the Lozells riots of 2005. I suggest posters consider very carefully what they post here. Unfounded rumours and hyperbole on discussion forums played an incendiary role in the lead up to the Lozells riots. So not a time for Internet blowhard-ery.

LadyDeliah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I just want to say that when I was talking to some

> of the protesters, who were mainly middle aged

> women as Bellenden Belle has stated, I didn't hear

> or see any of the racist placards or shouts

> mentioned above.

>

> I'd be interested to see some evidence of that.

>

> The pecking order of immigrants mentioned above is

> exactly what I think is happening in Peckham Rye,

> plus the fact (from one of the shopkeepers own

> account) that people who used to give other Asian

> shopkeepers trouble didn't understand that they

> are Afghan and always fight back.

>

> That is fair enough, I would never advocate taking

> crap from anyone, but it is my understanding that

...

> the Peckham Rye shopkeepers have taken the tacit

> approval of the police as permission to continue

> to inflict violence on black youths as a whole,

> which is out of order and needs to be stopped.


"... on black youths a whole..." Really? Or just those youths that get into an altercation with them? That in itself would of course be undesirable, but to suggest they're in a war against all black youths is ridiculous hyperbole.

Yeah maybe I'll apply for a job in Khan's so I can join their initiative of singling-out innocent young men to beat up.

Give me a break.

There's slightly more than zero facts earlier in this thread, it gets the stick it deserves, for trying to stir-up hatred against the Afghans by labelling them with cheap insults.

They won't be pushed around so swallow it and leave them alone.

I've met many middle aged mothers who are very forthright when they perceive that their not-so-little darlings are being wronged and they are not necessarily willing to consider the other side of the story. So the fact that they are there BB does not indicate to me that they have not been sucked into the mob mentality. During the riots there were mothers urging their offspring to go into JB sports and get some free trainers.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> pk I am not naive, I think you shouldn't be

> chucking allegations of racism at people in an

> effort to make yourself look so enlightened.


you asked me a question - albeit rudely and with a stupid illustration of why KK wasn't racist (in your opinion) (although he admits himself that he's made assumptions about people, seemingly based on racial stereotypes)


i answered


so why can't you respond to any of the substance of what's been said rather than going on about looking 'enlightened'? what does that mean anyway?

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes KK made an assumption which may or may not be

> correct. To go from that to calling him a racist

> is over reaching IMO.


even when the assumptions are that the black victim of a beating (or their supporters)is a "bruvva" "wannabe gangster who's never worked for anything himself" and who is "used to getting their way through rough talk and intimidation" and "brought-up on gangster hip-hop and dominating people"


you think that this is ok?


and anyway i said racist or ignorant or illogical - and i reckon that at least 2 of these three are probably true based on this thread

That is a stereotype, but stereotypes always exist for a reason, and to deny that there are quite a few youths that fit that description in that area is just denial.


Was it definitely someone like that? No, and KK probably should not assume.


Is there a reasonable chance it was someone like that? Yes!


This whole thread is based on assumptions and rumour, and I think I'll leave it now, because there is a nasty undertone starting to surface.

You have to stereotype things, there are types,styles,peoples,so on and so forth,to get hysterical over a word is really stupid its a desribing word not a rascist word.

Lets use the English language in its true meaning form.

Like very angry shopkeepers taking the law in their own hands and very peed off assualted customer wanting fair play.

Simple.

KK was sticking his neck out a bit. There is of course no evidence to suggest that the victim here is involved in gang culture. It's not a deduction I would have made.


But the really worrying stuff in this thread is the implication that Afghans are violent, racist people who go around beating the crap out of innocent black teenagers for the hell of it. People should be pulling LadyD up on this gross generalisation.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...