Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I own a flat, while I was ill and then having to stay away due to shielding, extremely clinically vulnerable and all that, the freeholder of my building sent a bill to an email address I couldn't access and then got a county court judgement registered in April. I didn't even know about it until 10 days ago. They had already started a separate action for the same amount which I did know about.


Before this my credit was perfect for 7 years. They are trying to force me to sell my flat for a debt of a few thousand pounds which I had disputed. As I have had to shield (although I do admit to going out a few times to the park as I was going crazy indoors) and I was a contract worker my income has disappeared and I have been living on savings, and now a CCJ means that I can't borrow. So I can't pay the debt off.


So I have been offered a bridging loan but I am told it is a private bridging loan, via a broker. I would be paying ?2890 in fees and 1.1% fixed rate simple interest on the loan per month that I kept it, exit at most in 12 months.


Does that sound right? Obviously it is a high rate of interest and they are charging 3% arrangement fee. They will put a charge on the property obviously, it would be a secured loan.



This would at least allow me to sell the property myself. The freeholder is a shark and a crook.


Could anyone advise please, how a private bridging loan works? I simply cannot afford to pay a lawyer to look into this, and there is just nowhere I can get advice from. I will soon be a pensioner and the flat represents everything I have earned over my entire life. If there is a forced sale that the shark freeholder has control of, they will sell it at huge undervalue to I guess their contacts or themselves indirectly and I will be left with next to nothing. I have no way at this time of life that I can possibly recover from this.


Although renters are protected at the moment, and mortgage payers, leaseholders who have even small service charge debts are just not protected, and this was done completely behind my back while I was first very ill and then shielding. Leaseholders can have their property repossessed.


If there are any knowledgable financial advisors or lawyers out there who could possibly give me some advice I would be enormously grateful. Very exhausted and stressed and really in need of sound advice. Please PM If you can help. I realise it would be totally informal advice and not given in any professional capacity.

woody vale in what format did the freeholder try to force you to sell your flat ?

Or are you actually saying that may be the financial consequence of what is going on (i.e. no-one is trying to make you sell your flat) ?

I'd get in touch with CAB, get legal advice and try opening a dialogue with landlord explaining circumstances, making sure you are CC'ing CAB and/legal body - so you have a record of trying to be reasonable.

Meanwhile why not file a case at small claims court to get some reasonable input.

What options have you advised the landlord so far, so he/she knows you're intent on paying when you can ?

I would get advice before you do anything, a lease forfeiture over a debt of a few thousand pounds sounds wrong. Have you tried to arranged a payment plan with them? You could sell the flat with the outstanding debt with an agreement to settle the debt once you complete (eg use some of the proceeds of the flat sale to do this)


Also did they send all communications to this email address you could not access? You have a responsibility to ensure you inform them if your contact details change but sending official communications by email only seems a bit wrong.


I am a director of our freehold company and we tend to send two chasing letters for outstanding charges and then send the debt to

Solicitors for collection. It would take a huge debt or no engagement from the lessee for a very long time to get to the point of lease forfeiture.

As Abe said, apply to court for judgment to be set aside. It's easy. Just Google it, you don't need a solicitor.


Do it quickly though.


What's the bill for? We're you expecting it? Can you dispute it?


In order to enforce a payment, eg sale of your flat, the freeholder would need to apply to the court.


There's an organization called Lease. They are free to talk to and you just book an appointment online. They are actually really amazing. Just Google Lease

You have not mentioned what the bill/s or for.


Major works or Service Charge or something else.


From memory there is a defined path that freeholders have to follow before sale of your property can be made.


If you already knew about the bill and done nothing you might be on a sticky wicket.


You should have received first/second and final demands re this debt then if you have not replied or disputed the bill the freeholder should have contacted your mortgage lender for payment which is normal procedure or you could have contacted your lender yourself.


Your mortgage lender would then have contacted you asking for an explanation of how the debt arose and if you had sufficient equity in the property and would you be in agreement for the debt to be paid off and the mortgage re adjusted.


If you have received these letters and ignored them you are in trouble. You would also have received a court appearance date. These letters would have been issued over many months not one and then court.


As I mentioned these steps have to be followed.


If you have been paying the mortgage on a regular basis and bearing in mind the current situation I would have thought you could have borrowed additional funds.


It maybe the case with past rising house prices you have already borrowed against the property and the mortgage company have said no.


The bottom line is if you have just ignored any correspondence you are in trouble. If the freeholder has not follwed these steps the court should be informed.


Your mortgage lenders are the people you should speak to.


Hope you can sort this out

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Good advice Kipper!  The 1.0 early Ecoboost and 1.2 Puretech engines have wet cam belts that fail and failure with a cam belt invariably result in catastrophic  damage to valves and pistons. Later ones were changed to chains. Avoid at all costs!
    • Sorry. Link wasn't working on my phone, but it is now, and I couldn't delete the post.
    • Sent you a pm
    • I think there's a fair number of "participating" sub offices that do passports or, at least, play the "check and send" game (£16 for glancing at your form), so some degree of cherry-picking seems to be permitted. Though it does look as if Post Offices "Indentity Services" are where it things the future lies, and "Right to Rent" (though it's more an eligibility check) looks a bit of an earner, along with DBS checks and the Age Verification services that, if the government gets its way, we'll all need to subscribe to before we're allowed on mumsnet. Those services, incidentally, seem mostly outsourced to an outfit called "Yoti", a privately-owned, loss-making "identity platform" with debts of £150m, a tardy approach to filings, and a finger in a bunch of questionable pies ("Passive Facial Liveness Recognition" sounds gloriously sinister) so what the Post Office gets out of the arrangement isn't clear, but I'm sure they think it worthwhile. That said, they once thought the same of funeral plans which, for some peculiar reason, failed to set fire to the shuffling queues, even metaphorically. For most, it seems, Post Office work is mostly a dead loss, and even the parcel-juggling is more nuisance than blessing. As a nonchalant retailer of other people's services the organisation can only survive now on the back of subsidies, and we're not even sure what they are. The taxpayer-funded subsidies from government (a £136m hand-out to keep Horizon going, £1bn for its compensation scheme, around £50m for the network, and perhaps a loan or two) are clearish, but the cross-subsidies provided by other retail activities in branches are murkier. As are the "phantom shortfalls" created by the Horizon system, which secretly lined Post Office's coffers as postmasters balanced the books with contributions from their own pockets. Those never showed up in the accounts though - because Horizon *was* the accounting system - so we can't tell how much of a subsidy that was. We might get an idea of the scale, however, from Post Office's belated Horizon Shortfall Scheme, which is handing £75k to every branch that's complained, though it's anyone's guess if that's fair or not. Still, that's all supposed to be behind us now, and Post Office's CEO-of-the-week recently promised an "extra" £250m a year for the branches (roughly enough to cover a minimum wage worker in each), which might make it worth the candle for some. Though he didn't expect that would happen before 2030 (we can only wonder when his pension will mature) and then it'd be "subject to government funding", so it might have to be a very short candle as it doesn't look like a promise that he can make. Still, I wouldn't want to discourage anyone from applying for a franchise, and it's possible that, this time, Post Office will be telling the truth. And, you never know, we might all be back in the Post Office soon, and eagerly buying stamps, if only for existence permits, rather than for our letters.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...