Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 1 year later...

Tuco is awesome... totally underused in Breaking Bad. Hopefully he'll pop up a few times more in BCS.


I reckon there's potential (maybe in the next series) to bring back Jesse and his buddies in one or two episodes. If you remember when we first met Saul in BB, Jesse implied that he was familiar with Saul and his... methods.

According to Wikipedia there were talks with the Jessie actor (Aaron somebody?) but he says it isn't happening. That's not to say it won't though.


Talks with Hank and Skylar have also happened apparently, so suspect we'll see some familiar faces in the future.


It also says it's both a prequel (it's set in 2002) and a sequel dealing with some of the aftermath of BB, so will be interesting to see how that all works out.


I could be wrong, but I think there are plenty of poeple out there who'd like to know what became of both Saul and Jessie after BB.

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Finally caught the first two episodes last night.

> I enjoyed it - definitely has potential.



We watched this last night


It felt slightly more Coen Brothers this time around


Saul is a great character, i'm glad to see him back

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I expect Jesse Pinkman (Aaron Paul) is earning a

> lot more with the X box ads.


But how long before the roles dry up for him? Whatever else he's in, he's always going to be Jesse Pinkman...


And the audience will be expecting him to end every sentence with "bitch!"

I've still only watched the first one. I know what Quids means about the link to Breaking Bad, but that's unavoidable. It couldn't work as a stand alone because in too many ways it's linking itself to the future of BB. For me it's a prequel.


I'd have liked to see earlier dealings with Gus, but in BB it is very clear that Saul has no idea who Gus is at first, so that ain't gonna happen.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Good advice Kipper!  The 1.0 early Ecoboost and 1.2 Puretech engines have wet cam belts that fail and failure with a cam belt invariably result in catastrophic  damage to valves and pistons. Later ones were changed to chains. Avoid at all costs!
    • Sorry. Link wasn't working on my phone, but it is now, and I couldn't delete the post.
    • Sent you a pm
    • I think there's a fair number of "participating" sub offices that do passports or, at least, play the "check and send" game (£16 for glancing at your form), so some degree of cherry-picking seems to be permitted. Though it does look as if Post Offices "Indentity Services" are where it things the future lies, and "Right to Rent" (though it's more an eligibility check) looks a bit of an earner, along with DBS checks and the Age Verification services that, if the government gets its way, we'll all need to subscribe to before we're allowed on mumsnet. Those services, incidentally, seem mostly outsourced to an outfit called "Yoti", a privately-owned, loss-making "identity platform" with debts of £150m, a tardy approach to filings, and a finger in a bunch of questionable pies ("Passive Facial Liveness Recognition" sounds gloriously sinister) so what the Post Office gets out of the arrangement isn't clear, but I'm sure they think it worthwhile. That said, they once thought the same of funeral plans which, for some peculiar reason, failed to set fire to the shuffling queues, even metaphorically. For most, it seems, Post Office work is mostly a dead loss, and even the parcel-juggling is more nuisance than blessing. As a nonchalant retailer of other people's services the organisation can only survive now on the back of subsidies, and we're not even sure what they are. The taxpayer-funded subsidies from government (a £136m hand-out to keep Horizon going, £1bn for its compensation scheme, around £50m for the network, and perhaps a loan or two) are clearish, but the cross-subsidies provided by other retail activities in branches are murkier. As are the "phantom shortfalls" created by the Horizon system, which secretly lined Post Office's coffers as postmasters balanced the books with contributions from their own pockets. Those never showed up in the accounts though - because Horizon *was* the accounting system - so we can't tell how much of a subsidy that was. We might get an idea of the scale, however, from Post Office's belated Horizon Shortfall Scheme, which is handing £75k to every branch that's complained, though it's anyone's guess if that's fair or not. Still, that's all supposed to be behind us now, and Post Office's CEO-of-the-week recently promised an "extra" £250m a year for the branches (roughly enough to cover a minimum wage worker in each), which might make it worth the candle for some. Though he didn't expect that would happen before 2030 (we can only wonder when his pension will mature) and then it'd be "subject to government funding", so it might have to be a very short candle as it doesn't look like a promise that he can make. Still, I wouldn't want to discourage anyone from applying for a franchise, and it's possible that, this time, Post Office will be telling the truth. And, you never know, we might all be back in the Post Office soon, and eagerly buying stamps, if only for existence permits, rather than for our letters.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...