Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I am firmly in the unusual names camp, but my son's name appears once in this thread. We are now having a girl and I thought that girls names would be easy, but they're not. We've got 5 weeks to go and I am sorely tempted to start a girls names thread, but maybe everyone is a bit 'named out'.....
I also like unusual names and my son's name has been mentioned on here too! Although we call him Kit. We were going to call him Fletcher and I still really like it, but when he was born it just didn't somehow suit him. Also on the shortlist was Inigo, although I preferred Ingo, and Loki.

Mrs TP Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

>

>

> Saying that one of my girls has the middle name

> Loveday and not met any of those yet. Also caused

> a few sniggers at the Christening from the other

> family there having their children Christened but

> sod 'em I love it.


I wanted Loveday as my daughter's middle name! But my other half vetoed it. Great name!

My first son's name was and still is pretty popular - pretty sure was 14 or something in that popular names list the year he was born. I love it though. His shortened version is a v common name but less so in his generation (or so I thought - seem to meet one a week at the moment!) - so I was def going for the classic but not trendy vibe with that one. Second son's full name is pretty unusual (though mentioned once on this thread - Fuschia the name generator, I should have asked you for inspiration this time last year!)- I really love it too - but we shorten it to again a fairly common name, just not overly popular in this generation. I prob prefer his full name to be honest. So I think I fall in the middle of the two camps: I don't go for that outlandish choices (partly because I was restrained by husband!) but also have avoided ones which are particularly trendy at any given time. It's funny though...my 3.5 yr old has already changed what we call him twice, quite organically, to different variations, and now when asked will always introduce himself with his full name, which we rarely use. So I guess the kids will decide their names in the end!

Norfolkvillas Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I am firmly in the unusual names camp, but my

> son's name appears once in this thread. We are

> now having a girl and I thought that girls names

> would be easy, but they're not. We've got 5 weeks

> to go and I am sorely tempted to start a girls

> names thread, but maybe everyone is a bit 'named

> out'.....



Oh I am sure discussing girls names would be fun! I had loads of ideas myself for girls names but only had one girl in the end ...

And I was just thinking again about the comment re: bullying... Sadly anyone with any name can be bullied and it's down to the bully unfortunately. In my year at school the names of people who were sadly bullied were things like Mark, Neil, Clare and Helen. I was never aware of serious bullying for names alone... And a very good friend of mine was called Arilda which is pretty unique!

Thanks - Hellosailor! But even the registrar laughed at the Town Hall and she must have seen some freaky names over the years, cheeky mare.


One of our brood once decided she was having a second middle name and hit on 'Tablecloth'. It stuck for a few years until I had to sit her down and explain that it really was not her middle name.


One of the 'best' blokes names I have ever tripped over is Stryker as in Stryker McGuire a US journalist.


I also know a grown up Heathcliff who gets shortened to Heath quite unusual.


See I started off on Peter and have ended up at Stryker ...

I love both Theo and Max.


When my little boy was born 2 years ago we were convinced that we were going to call him Theo. But when he arrived it just didn't suit . .


We called him Sid. Sidney Joseph is the full name but we always call him Sid unless he's been particularly naughty. I think it's the best name ever but then I'm extremely biased!!

Fuschia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Isn't it funny how once your child is named you

> can't imagine them by any other name?

>

> What names were short listed but not used?

>

> Child no 1 could have been Cai or Keir

> Daughter was intended to be Grainne if I ever had

> a girl, but in the end I chose a different name

> Latest child no inspiration struck - I toyed with

> Neirin to universal disapprobation


My second is Keir - a compromise name after we couldn't agree on our first choice. My eldest is a 'Linus'. I remeber telling my sister what we were going to call him and the phone went silent for a few minutes - unusual for my sister. Glad to see that both names are going even further DOWN the popularity charts than they even used to be.....No others in their classes, no others in their school....

hpsaucey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Fuschia Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Isn't it funny how once your child is named you

> > can't imagine them by any other name?

> >

> > What names were short listed but not used?

> >

> >


I called my daughter a very pretty name that I do really like, objectively, but it was not on our list at all when I was pregnant, because although I like it it obviously wasn't one of my top 10 even!

My partner just wouldn't agree to any of the names I was keen on, including one I had set my heart on and mentally attached to the baby while pregnant, secretly sure I could persuade him! Mistake! I thought watching me go through labour would swing it but no!

I'm not sure what the answer is when you can't agree, other than going further and further down a list so that you compromise on one that was not on either of your lists, which feels a bit counter intuitive, but seemed to be the only way sometimes. My daughter is 19 months now and it's only really in the last few months that I have been able to call her by her name instead of a gazillion pet names, and only recently that I've stopped feeling a pang of disappointment when someone uses her name, I know that's awful! I do like the name, which is good, I just had no intention of calling a child by the name!

Perhaps naively I assumed when I imagined having children that I would call them names that made my heart sing every time I heard them called or saw them written down, that I felt totally suited them down to the ground, but I guess when I imagined that I was a moony teenager who wasn't factoring in that two people would be involved in making the decision!

I know quite a few people who feel a bit shaky about the names they've called their children, some people who regularly say 'I so wish we hadn't called him x, I really don't like it now!', or 'It so doesn't suit her, what were we thinking!', and 2 friends who have changed their babies names at about 8 months and 1 year (different friends), as they just couldn't get used to them at all. Some of their friends were horrified apparently, but others said it was a no-brainer if they had found they didn't like the name.

Anyway, rambled contribution over ,loving this thread!

I like Nils as well. We actually named our son something else (springbabies ladies know:) ) but as no one in our family liked it i changed it in my postnatal hormonal state:) we even got

Congratulations card with the old name on, oh dear.

I still love the other name but the one he finally got really does suit him. This thread is making me really broody.

Husband laughed when I said I liked it but it's still a favourite (thankfully no more children to inflict it on) - Ptolemy.


Used to like Jude but feel it has been tarnished a little by Jude Law (I'm not a fan of his), but this is one of my oldest's sons middle names.


Also like:

Jago

Mylo (not allowed in our house as I'm Australian and said before, this is a chocolate malt drink)

Zander

Oisin (pronounced OH-sheen)

Raef

Raphael


We've ended up with 2 Old Testament names and are often asked if we are Jewish or Christian (neither).

When our daughter was born I remember looking at her for the first time and saying 'oh, hello M'. We had chosen the name but said let's wait and see if it suits her, but as it turned out she just Was M! with our son it was more of a settling in process. We kept calling him mostly by his pet bump name and the real name we had chosen gradually got to suit him as we got used to it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • https://www.facebook.com/labourparty/posts/when-your-family-and-friends-ask-you-what-labour-has-achieved-so-far-send-them-t/1090481149116565/    Do you mean going from rhyming with Message to rhyming with Massage?  Or was it really a hard g to start with, rhyming, say,  with Farague/Faraig or Fararg?
    • Why on earth is there so much interest, and negativity, after a 100 days of a Labour government when we had 1000s of days of dreadful government before this with hardly a chat on this Website?  What is it that is suddenly so much greater interest? Here's part of a list of what they have done in a 100 days - it's from a Labour MP so obviously there is some bias, and mainly new Bills so yet to deliver/put into law.  This reminds me of the US election where the popular view was that Biden had achieved nothing, rather than leading the recovery after Covid, a fairer tax system, housing, supporting workers, dealing with community unrest following high profile racist incidents,  So if we think Starmer is ineffective and Labour incompetent then we are all going to believe it? I do feel sick after seeing Clarkson on Newsnight, playing to the gallery.  Surely Trump must have a high profile role for him on the environment and climate change  
    • Hi looking for a shed for my allotment. Can pick up
    • But do you not understand how tough farming is, especially post-Brexit when some of the subsidies were lost and costs have increased massively yet the prices farmers can charge has not? On the BBC News tonight they said pig farming costs had gone up 54% since 2019, cow farming costs up 44% and cereal costs up 43%. The NFU said that the margins are on average 0.5% return on capital. Land and buildings are assets that don't make money until you sell them...it's what you do with them that makes money and farms are struggling to make money and so many farms are generational family businesses so never realise the assets (one farmers on the news said his farm had been in the family since 1822) but will have to to pay tax for continuing the family business. On another news item tonight there was a short piece saying the government has said that 50,000 more pensioners will be forced into relative poverty (60% of the average income) due to the Winter Fuel Allowance removal which will rise to 100,000 more by 2027. James Murray from the Treasury was rolled out on Newsnight to try and defend that and couldn't. You can't give doctors 20%+ and push more pensioners into poverty as a result.  The problem for Labour is the court of public opinion will judge them and right now the jury is out after a series of own-goals, really poor communication and ill-thought-out idealogical policies. And don't ever annoy the farmers.....;-)  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...