Jump to content

Recommended Posts

pk Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> TheCat Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I just don't get it.

> >

> for once we agree


feel free to actually add something construcive to the discussion pk. I know thinking for yourself can be really difficult. But im 10% sure you can do it.

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> TheCat Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > It seems you have a different definition of

> > privilege than Janaya Khan (co founder of black

> > lives matter), who says that?"Privilege isn't

> > about what you've gone through; it's about what

> > you haven't had to go through."

>

> I am mystified as to how you can conclude that by

> anything I wrote. Read my post again. It was a

> valid point on the historical development of

> entrenched privilege and why it is so hard to

> compete with. If however you want to debate a

> quote by Janaya Khan instead, that is fine (I

> agree with her point too btw). Just don't conflate

> that with anything I have not actually said ;)

>

> > So, surely by everyone being involved in the

> > dialogue (rather than white people being

> > #MUTEDBUTLISTENING...or #SILENCED depending on

> > your viewpoint) means minorities can be

> elevated

> > so that no one has to 'go through' it...so no

> one

> > loses their privilege, just some people gain

> > it.....

>

> But that ignores the central point I made about

> self preserving entrenchment of class based

> privilege. That exists. Those who have most never

> want to give any of it up. If they did, there

> would be no Monarchy, no public schools, no

> institution of any sort that rewards people by the

> luck of who they are born to. Yes we can have

> detailed debates about that, but none of that

> changes the inequalities caused by that

> entrenchment of privilege.

>

> There was a documentary a little while ago that

> looked at the struggles of Black graduates

> entering into certain professions, like law, the

> city etc. All the data shows that black students

> can go to the same colleges as their white middle/

> upper class counterparts, do better in their final

> results, but fail to be as successful as those

> counterparts in being recruited to top city firms

> etc. THAT is an example of white privilege self

> preserving. It seeks to preserve its own class

> culture. This is precisely why BAME/ working

> class/ Women etc struggle to climb ladders and

> break glass ceilings. And when they do, it because

> they can play the game, become like those whose

> club they are allowed into. It rarely changes the

> other way round.


okay fair enough...we're sort of talking to slightly different points to be fair. But they do compliment eachother I think....You're suggesting that people with privelige want to protect it. I would say that (unless its a bloody revolution), then the only way to coax them down off the mountain is by involving them in the conversation - people shouting from the bottom of the mountain about how the people at the top must behave without their buy-in is unlikely to be successful I would guess...

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Cat, people love to jump on this one.

> Weirdly, in a way they wouldn't to your face.

> Well done bringing it up, there is a sense of

> "who's entitled to talk about what" on this

> subject.


Exactly.


TheCat, If you are willing to understand & if need be enlightened, you are on the right path.

The same cannot be said for the negative messages of unwillingness to solve the problem.


I'll just place these right here. Maybe these people can educate themselves, because Martin Luther King & Malcholm X clashed in their solution, but they both agreed on one thing; that the left could not be trusted.




azfns6l6bt011.jpg



Thomas Sowell:


67330867_373691953323164_4898320414648934685_n.jpg


Let that sink in.


Alveda King {MLK's niece}, Candace Owens https://www.instagram.com/realcandaceowens/.... two black women who voted for Trump.

You have to question why that is.


Now if anybody actually wants to help;

https://blacklivesmatters.carrd.co/


Your Kids Aren't Too Young to Talk About Race: Resource Roundup:

https://www.prettygooddesign.org/blog/Blog%20Post%20Title%20One-5new4?fbclid=IwAR1ET6ejIfiVxG9Y8urZOv1qEcXWIPEJQJoFGAFmNMJb_DNnDPN6V5TJkoo


There is a peaceful protest tomorrow 4th June which anyone can participate in from the safety

& comfort of their homes. There's no excuse.

https://www.facebook.com/events/935909903525530/



Heather {The Wingless Bird}

TheCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> pk Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > TheCat Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > I just don't get it.

> > >

> > for once we agree

>

> feel free to actually add something construcive to

> the discussion pk. I know thinking for yourself

> can be really difficult. But im 10% sure you can

> do it.


you've rolled out this type of provocative/ignorant/arrogant/naive/childish rubbish before about race and about gender so i don't believe that someone who thinks that they don't need any education on issues of discrimination really wants to engage in constructive discussion


someone cleverer than you once said something along the lines of: "if you have a critique of our resistance, you better have a record of critiquing our oppression" but for you it seems that you'd rather call of black people and women for not appreciating your 'good' (but ill informed) intentions as a white man

pk Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> TheCat Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > pk Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > TheCat Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > -----

> > > > I just don't get it.

> > > >

> > > for once we agree

> >

> > feel free to actually add something construcive

> to

> > the discussion pk. I know thinking for yourself

> > can be really difficult. But im 10% sure you

> can

> > do it.

>

> you've rolled out this type of

> provocative/ignorant/arrogant/naive/childish

> rubbish before about race and about gender so i

> don't believe that someone who thinks that they

> don't need any education on issues of

> discrimination really wants to engage in

> constructive discussion

>

> someone cleverer than you once said something

> along the lines of: "if you have a critique of our

> resistance, you better have a record of critiquing

> our oppression" but for you it seems that you'd

> rather call of black people and women for not

> appreciating your 'good' (but ill informed)

> intentions as a white man


All you've just said there that I've said things that you don't agree with. So if someone says something that doesn't align with your worldview, they must just be being provocative/ignorant/arrogant/naive/childish?


My views disagree with your own, so you won't 'engage' and try and change my mind.....you'll just dismiss me becuase of my race and gender...there's a name for people that do that....


But in seriousness, I don't think you're really a bigot, but I think we all know it's actually becuase if it's not written in the Guardian, or cant be parroted from people who are 'cleverer than me', then you've got a absolutley nothing of value to say..

TheCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> pk Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > TheCat Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > pk Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > -----

> > > > TheCat Wrote:

> > > >

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > >

> > > > -----

> > > > > I just don't get it.

> > > > >

> > > > for once we agree

> > >

> > > feel free to actually add something

> construcive

> > to

> > > the discussion pk. I know thinking for

> yourself

> > > can be really difficult. But im 10% sure you

> > can

> > > do it.

> >

> > you've rolled out this type of

> > provocative/ignorant/arrogant/naive/childish

> > rubbish before about race and about gender so i

> > don't believe that someone who thinks that they

> > don't need any education on issues of

> > discrimination really wants to engage in

> > constructive discussion

> >

> > someone cleverer than you once said something

> > along the lines of: "if you have a critique of

> our

> > resistance, you better have a record of

> critiquing

> > our oppression" but for you it seems that you'd

> > rather call of black people and women for not

> > appreciating your 'good' (but ill informed)

> > intentions as a white man

>

> All you've just said there that I've said things

> that you don't agree with, and becuase I'm a

> 'white man', I must just being

> provocative/ignorant/arrogant/naive/childish.

>


no it's not


> My views disagree with your own, so you won't

> 'engage' and try and change my mind.....you'll

> just dismiss me becuase of my race and

> gender...there's a name for people that do

> that....


it's not to do with your race or gender

>

> But in seriousness, I don't think you're really a

> bigot, but I think we all know it's actually

> becuase if it's not written in the Guardian, or

> cant be parroted from people who are 'cleverer

> than me', then you've got a absolutley nothing of

> value to say..


so, so pathetic

pk Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> >

>

> no it's not

>


>

> it's not to do with your race or gender

> >

>

>

> so, so pathetic



Chuckles. What a brilliantly insightful set of responses. Thank you so much pk for unambiguously proving my point.


Gotta run now, but look forward to next time when you make me reconsider my whole world view by calling me 'pathetic'....hahahaha

TheCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> pk Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > >

> >

> > no it's not

> >

>

> >

> > it's not to do with your race or gender

> > >

> >

> >

> > so, so pathetic

>

>

> Chuckles. What a brilliantly insightful set of

> responses. Thank you so much pk for unambiguously

> proving my point.

>

> Gotta run now, but look forward to next time when

> you make me reconsider my whole world view by

> calling me 'pathetic'....hahahaha


so so so pathetic

pk Wrote:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

>


> so so so pathetic


So you've doubled down on your 'pathetic' line of argument? Good for you. It's not much, but it's all you have.


Oh, and while we're talking 'pathetic'. Let's remember that your original involvement in this thread was not to comment on the topic. No. It was for no other reason than post a personal insult at me. You really are a joy.

Jeeez cat 'understanding my white privilege and seeing it as psrt of the solution blah blah' is a nice theoretical debate, systematic racism and day to day discrimination is something that you and I (as a white male) know absolutely fuck all about and not some intellectual exercise.

Thank you!




???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jeeez cat 'understanding my white privilege and

> seeing it as psrt of the solution blah blah' is a

> nice theoretical debate, systematic racism and day

> to day discrimination is something that you and I

> (as a white male) know absolutely @#$%& all about

> and not some intellectual exercise.

Ronnijade Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> None of this should even be a discussion


Sorry?...we should not discuss racial prejudice and society's attitudes and approach to trying to address it?


Your attitude is part of the problem I'm afraid.


You clearly haven't actually read most of the thread with any semblance of openmindedness or objectivity. Just knee-jerk reaction to the fact that a sensitive issue is being discussed.

DulwichBorn&Bred Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Thank you!

>

>

>

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Jeeez cat 'understanding my white privilege and

> > seeing it as psrt of the solution blah blah' is

> a

> > nice theoretical debate, systematic racism and

> day

> > to day discrimination is something that you and

> I

> > (as a white male) know absolutely @#$%& all

> about

> > and not some intellectual exercise.


100 percent agreed. That's the whole point....look at the OP (and the attachment to the OP)...I'm specifically questioning all the uber theoretical language that surrounds the issue. And I think as a result, the public debate has been hijacked and seen plenty of people disengage to a large degree.


As I say in that post, the layer upon layer of rules about who is entitled talk about what, and when and how and to who is ridiculous.


Of course I don't experience day to day racism like a minority would. So I should listen to people discussing those experiences. But if the claim is that we have systemic racism...then surely the solution involves EVERYONE in the system having a view on the solution. And my issue with all this is with the media narrative that white people aren't really allowed to comment...which seems counter-productive to me....

I agree that the sometimes arcane language and references can cloud the issue. It becomes another layer of division or is used as a sword and shield. It?s almost like an industry and as such is self referential and solipsistic. Talk open and freely and listen but don?t use terms that until twitter came along were usually found in specialist texts. Everyone?s entitled to a POV. The more clearly it is expressed, and the more intently it is listened to the better.

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I agree that the sometimes arcane language and

> references can cloud the issue. It becomes another

> layer of division or is used as a sword and

> shield. It?s almost like an industry and as such

> is self referential and solipsistic. Talk open and

> freely and listen but don?t use terms that until

> twitter came along were usually found in

> specialist texts. Everyone?s entitled to a POV.

> The more clearly it is expressed, and the more

> intently it is listened to the better.


But if I attend a Sales and Marketing meeting they use Sales and Marketing terms. Every area has it's own terms and really it shouldn't take anyone long to acquaint themselves with the basic terms and what they mean (and I mean just google them).


For instance as employees being asked to read up on conscious inclusion and understand what it means is not unreasonable in the same way when you attend a briefing on how the company you work for is doing you are expected to google what EBITA is.

pk Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> TheCat Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I should listen to people discussing those

> experiences

>

> and yet you don't, you criticise unidentified

> people for saying things that you don't understand



Listening is not the same thing as blindly endorsing everything that someone says. One can listen and then ask questions. It's how we learn PK.


But the evidence keeps mounting that you take a different view. Can you quote me one of those clever people again please....?

DulwichBorn&Bred Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> They are allowed to comment The Cat but you do

> come across quite offensive and that is the issue.

> I find you offensive.


They are allowed to comment. As are you. And as am I.


Not much I can do about your offense, sorry. That's the thing about offence, it's subjective.

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I agree that the sometimes arcane language and

> references can cloud the issue. It becomes another

> layer of division or is used as a sword and

> shield. It?s almost like an industry and as such

> is self referential and solipsistic. Talk open and

> freely and listen but don?t use terms that until

> twitter came along were usually found in

> specialist texts. Everyone?s entitled to a POV.

> The more clearly it is expressed, and the more

> intently it is listened to the better.



Great comment.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...