Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have a very lovely houseguest but when he goes for a shit, he doesnt use the toilet brush after and its messy! he is going to be here for a month so dont want to have to carry on scrubbing it all the time. Men! only joking, dont start off on the men/women thing ok?!

Lots of people have no idea what the toilet brush is for and that goes for both sexes.

I remember when I flatshared with a best mate, she was nasty, I actually had to leave a note for her and tell her that the toilet cleaner and toilet brush was there for a reason!!

tinagwee Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I have a very lovely houseguest but when he goes

> for a shit, he doesnt use the toilet brush after

> and its messy!


Tell him. These are the house rules, you clean up after yourself. If you don't like the idea then find somewhere else.

How bout:


"Mo-fo, when you drop a slimy one, it leaves a trail. Clean up you dirty f***er or I'll crap in the bath before you use it!"


I mean, why beat around the bush? Subtelty doesn't always work. I spent many years working in a large office where one of my colleagues had appalling dental hygiene. I don't know what was going on - it looked like he hadn't brushed his teeth or been to a dentist for years - like looking into the pit of hell any time he yawned. One person eventually bought a tooth-brush at lunch-time and left it anonymously on his desk as a subtle hint. He returned from his break, picked up the toothbrush, announced in a loud voice "Someone has left a toothbrush on my desk" and spent the rest of the afternoon wandering around, speculating loudly as to who the toothbrush could belong to, why it was left on his desk and why the owner didn't want to claim it!

Darling Tingawee,


OHMYGOD, what a frightful guest!!!


But there really are some genuinely coarse suggestions on this thread regarding how you should tackle the situation.


I myself would simply show him the door. Say something along the lines of "It simply isn't working old man, hey ho" while tossing his ruck sack onto an open fire in your back yard and observing as your gardner digs a grave shaped hole in the middle of your lawn...

You probably just need him to get thinking about it. Throw the old one away and say the brush was being overused and you're going to get a new one as soon as you possibly can.


Another way could be to tell him a joke about using a toilet brush.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
    • Can’t recommend the company enough, great service. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...