Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So I understand that every child from 3 years is entitled to 15 hours of free nursery care a week for 38 weeks a year. But how does it work in practice? Does every nursery have to accept this? My daughter is just over 2 and although we have a full-time nanny share I thought it would be good for her to experience a few mornings a week of nursery (but we can't afford both nanny and nursery). So this would seem ideal. I just can't get my head around it! If we got a place now that we paid for, then when she turns 3 does it become free? Can anyone shed any light on this? The Southwark Family Life website is a bit generalised about how it works and I don't really want to call nurseries asking for a free place!

Thanks

I think it depends on the nursery. In my personal experience, my son started at a montessori when he was 2.5, we paid for one term of fees for 5 half days (mornings only) and then when he turned 3 we didn't have to pay any longer. Now he does over 15 hours a week, so we pay for the extra hours. His nursery is only open 38 weeks a year.

Quite a few nurseries don't offer just 15h but insist on full time or various extras or the full 52 weeks all of which will cost you


School nurseries offer 15h term time no complications


You may need to ring round others to check what they offer


Where do you live?

Our (minimal!) enquiries seem to suggest that school nurseries offer 15 free hrs a week during term time (as Fuschia says) - but I think this has to be taken as either 5 mornings a week of 3hrs (eg 9am-12pm everyday) or 5 afternoons a week of 3 hrs (not sure of the hours here, but suspect it's something like 1-4pm). ie, you can't pick and choose your days.

A private nursery will be more flexible on days, and will often deduct your 15 free hours from the total time you enrol them for - ie, if you choose to do 9am - 6pm three days a week, your fees will be reduced by 15 hrs a week. But I think you have to put them in for the full 52 weeks (unless you give notice before your 38 weeks of free hours are up).

your child is entitled to this the term after they turn 3 (kind of. I've been told that although my child is 3 mid december she's not entitled to this until the summer term humph.). Not all private nurseries offer it. Some school nurseries insist on a child doing 5 morning sessions or afternoon sessions a week, rather than 2 or 3. Non-school nurseries who do it will still charge as they are open more than 38 weeks, but the fees will be less than before, and they may insist on a minimum number of sessions or days.
well, the private pre-school my neice goes to didn't, but they have started now. It was held in a church hall and not every day so perhaps that's why? I would certainly check out the criteria before committing yourself to a particular nursery or pre-school.
We live in North Dulwich, Fuschia so I'll start my enquiries with the ones around here. The confusing thing is that when you go to the Early Learning section of the Southwark website, there is a bit that says "Where can my child get a free early education place?". Then it lists nurseries, schools, etc and you can click through and download a list of Southwark nurseries. However that list is pretty comprehensive and includes nurseries that I'm pretty sure don't participate in this scheme (e.g. DUCKS). So it's pretty useless as a source of info and it seems like you need to approach each nursery individually. Very dull!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • https://www.facebook.com/labourparty/posts/when-your-family-and-friends-ask-you-what-labour-has-achieved-so-far-send-them-t/1090481149116565/    Do you mean going from rhyming with Message to rhyming with Massage?  Or was it really a hard g to start with, rhyming, say,  with Farague/Faraig or Fararg?
    • Why on earth is there so much interest, and negativity, after a 100 days of a Labour government when we had 1000s of days of dreadful government before this with hardly a chat on this Website?  What is it that is suddenly so much greater interest? Here's part of a list of what they have done in a 100 days - it's from a Labour MP so obviously there is some bias, and mainly new Bills so yet to deliver/put into law.  This reminds me of the US election where the popular view was that Biden had achieved nothing, rather than leading the recovery after Covid, a fairer tax system, housing, supporting workers, dealing with community unrest following high profile racist incidents,  So if we think Starmer is ineffective and Labour incompetent then we are all going to believe it? I do feel sick after seeing Clarkson on Newsnight, playing to the gallery.  Surely Trump must have a high profile role for him on the environment and climate change  
    • Hi looking for a shed for my allotment. Can pick up
    • But do you not understand how tough farming is, especially post-Brexit when some of the subsidies were lost and costs have increased massively yet the prices farmers can charge has not? On the BBC News tonight they said pig farming costs had gone up 54% since 2019, cow farming costs up 44% and cereal costs up 43%. The NFU said that the margins are on average 0.5% return on capital. Land and buildings are assets that don't make money until you sell them...it's what you do with them that makes money and farms are struggling to make money and so many farms are generational family businesses so never realise the assets (one farmers on the news said his farm had been in the family since 1822) but will have to to pay tax for continuing the family business. On another news item tonight there was a short piece saying the government has said that 50,000 more pensioners will be forced into relative poverty (60% of the average income) due to the Winter Fuel Allowance removal which will rise to 100,000 more by 2027. James Murray from the Treasury was rolled out on Newsnight to try and defend that and couldn't. You can't give doctors 20%+ and push more pensioners into poverty as a result.  The problem for Labour is the court of public opinion will judge them and right now the jury is out after a series of own-goals, really poor communication and ill-thought-out idealogical policies. And don't ever annoy the farmers.....;-)  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...