Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Is this the start of something new in the increasingly evening entertainment free rye lane?


http://app.southwark.gov.uk/licensing/LicPremisesGrantedDetails.asp?systemkey=834258


Licence to open until 4AM on weekends.


Interesting addendum


Owner recently had licence to run a club in Lambeth revoked after issues and complaints ( South Beach bar)


http://www.lambeth.gov.uk/moderngov/mgAi.aspx?ID=19202


Based on an application by the Lambeth Police Licensing Unit for a review of the South Beach Bar on the grounds that conditions/undertakings had been breached and that crime and disorder was taking place.


I have no axe to grind here, just bringing it up.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/25307-rye-lane-revamp/
Share on other sites

The Peckham Area Action Plan (PNAAP) http://www.southwark.gov.uk/info/200315/peckham_and_nunhead is shortly to come out for a final consultation (13 September ? 4 December 2012). This is a key planning policy document about the appropriate and allowable uses of land & buildings. One of the issues to be addressed is whether Peckham town centre should have an 'evening' economy or a 'night? economy. It would be useful to have a discussion about this and clarify the case for and against a night economy.


Having seen the comments in this thread it seemed a possible place for such a discussion. What do you think?

I am in favour of discussing the plan here, but even better in the "General ED issues [...]" section of the EDF.


The PNAAP is deceptively named. If anyone cares to check the maps the PNAAP boundary includes a very large area of East Dulwich. (For example Piermont Green and Aquarius).


John K


[Edited to help Huguenot]

Good idea John K about a substantial thread in the main section on the PNAAP. Might a better time for that be when the new text is available? I am told this will be around 12 September, and I am willing to start it up when the new text appears. Before then can we share some thoughts about this business of evening v night economy in this thread? When the main thread starts we could make a link to this discussion on that topic. Would that work?


In previous consultations I have said I didn?t think it was appropriate to go for a full night economy as the residential area is so integrated with Peckham town centre. This does not mean no night time activities but I believe they need to be the exception and not the rule.


There is I have discovered a lot of loose and unclear use of language and often the work of town centre management and urban regeneration loosely say night economy when sometimes they mean 24 hours and sometimes they mean just evening. But there is a big difference. See ** below for an indication of the kinds of issues being considered under 'night' economy.


I'd be glad to know what others think about what is appropriate for Peckham town centre.


********************************************************************


** http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275106000448


From ?creative city? to ?no-go areas? ? The expansion of the night-time economy in British town and city centres

Marion Roberts, Central Cities Institute, University of Westminster, 35 Marylebone Road, London NW15LS, UK


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


In a time span of 10 years, many English town centres have been transformed from being relatively deserted at night to being filled with concentrations of young drunken people out on the streets until the early hours of the morning. This paper considers this transformation: its origins, process, impacts, policy responses and the lessons that may be derived from it. The first section discusses the concept of the creative milieu and its relation to consumption. The second provides the context for the unprecedented expansion of night-time alcohol related entertainment in English town and city centres over the last decade. The third part of the paper discusses the impacts of the increase in licensed premises on cultural resources. The fourth section of the paper discusses the mutually contradictory tri-partite policy responses of the British Government as it tries to reconcile planning policies that promote ?cleaner, safer and greener? town centres with, on the one hand, free market inspired licensing policies and, on the other, ?tough? policies towards crime and anti-social behaviour. The fifth section provides evidence that by contrast, some local practice is ahead of national policy in its imaginative and integrated approach. Finally, conclusions are drawn with regard to the concept of the creative milieu. It is argued that the English experience demonstrates the need for a clear policy vision that comprehends the differences between creativity, cultural resources and the consumption of alcohol as a primary entertainment activity.

There isn't a 'main section' of the EDF, there is a section for East Dulwich issues which by legacy is listed first.


The subject you propose is about Peckham, not about ED.


If you want to keep it in the East Dulwich issues section you'll need to work pretty hard to make it an ED issue!

I don't give a fuck about the maps.


Seriously....if you want to talk about the Peckham Plan, just do it. Stop fussing about which bit of the forum it goes on and whether it also needs to include East Dulwich etc etc. Do you have any idea how anal it appears?


Just talk about the plan. Or don't. I don't care. Just stop posting endless pictures maps and boundaries.


I'm off to curl up into a ball in a hole now and rock myself to death.

oh dear


All those posts and not one about the issue I raised. Which is the thread then to attract local people who are willing to have a serious exchange of thoughts about these planning policy matters? They are relevant to this EDF because they affect many ED residents as the town centre is on their doorstep and what happens there has a big effect on their own ED neighbourhood and shopping area.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I mean I hold no portfolio to defend Gala,  but I suspect that is their office.  I am a company director,  my home address is also not registered with Companies House. Also guys this is Peckham not Royston Vasey.  Shoreditch is a mere 20 mins away by train, it's not an offshore bolt hole in Luxembourg.
    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...