Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Last year we started the imms at the MediCentre at Victoria. My LO had the first jab, and we were scheduled for the booster. Then I became very unwell, and I failed to get her back for the 2nd jab. We're starting nursery this Sept, so I will definitely be redoing this immunisation. I thought this would me starting over from scratch, but CDC webpages (see additional post below) indicate that we're still in good time to receive the second dose up to around 5 yo.


I've already heard from 2 separate sources of cases of Chickenpox this summer. I'm wondering if that means that this year the virus is exceptionally potent, as it's usually a winter/spring virus.


Talking to a friend of a friend recently who said how very unwell one of her little boys had been with chickenpox a couple of years ago. I think the child was around 4 yo at the time. She wasn't even aware that there is vaccine.


Here is the info for MediCentre:

http://www.medicentre.co.uk/

They recommend making appointments in advance, and I think the Vic location is the only one that does children. Call for more info 0207 510 0300

We had our then 18 month old son immuized at MediCentre Victoria and it was an awful experience (last yr). Not because the jab was horrible but because their customer service and the centre itself left alot to be desired. Someone was stuck in the lift for half an hour when I was there (lift is only way up, otherwise you have to go down a fire exit that leads onto the station concourse), surly Receptionist, I was 4 months pregnant and was told I had to carry heavy bugaboo down the stairs alone whilst holding toddlers hand because of broken lift. Was told the jab was 70 pounds + 15 registration fee, only to then be told I'd need to pay another 70 pounds for a booster after I had arrived. The Reception was pretty dirty and all in all I wouldn't recommend MediCentre. I complained about the fact I hadn't been warned the cost was 2 x 70 pounds in advance afterwards, and their team then told me 'oh don't worry you don't actually need 2 jabs its just the 1' (convenient).


I've since heard from friends that you do need 2 jabs but am probably not going to bother as its too late now (think you need to do it 8 weeks after the first). My GP has also advised against the jab for chicken pox as its not 100% proof and its more dangerous to catch it in adulthood (apparently) as can lead to quite serious pneumonia (am not a doctor so don't quote me on that) so she reckons its better to get it as a child and not immunize.


I now have a 5 month old and if I do decide to go for the jab for her and my son I won't go to Medicentre - not sure where else does it but am sure there must be something on Harley St or similar. I've also heard their Victoria branch has closed down anyway.


As far as the jab goes it was pretty painless and no side effects in my son after he had it. But as you can probably tell I would advise against MediCentre!!! Good luck

How strange I was about to post asking about this.


My question is the same - does it provide guaranteed lifetime immunity?


I have also seen children very unwell with chickenpox this year and I remember being very unwell with it. Would like my daughter to have the jab in principle. In Australia it is routinely offered I believe?


Susypx

Chickenpox virus is usually mild in children, but serious complications can and do occur even in otherwise healthy children after contracting the virus. One serious complication of which most people are unaware is inflammation of the brain (encephalitis) which can lead to permanent damage.


I've also been confused on the one-dose vs two-dose strategies. I think I had originally read one dose gives good immunity but that it wanes rapidly. Therefore it was recommended that it was two doses 6-12 wks apart to give 98% immunity. However, looking at the CDC's webpage (cp imms standard in the USA now, so they have a mass of data), they recommend the first dose around 1 year old, and the second dose before entering reception class (4 to 6 years old).

http://www.cdc.gov/chickenpox/vaccination.html


Immunised immunity from chickenpox virus does diminish over time. Some sources are recommending that teens and elderly or at risk patients be re-vaccinated.


Whereas, contracting the virus gives longer immunity, it still leaves adults exposed to developing shingles (a re-emergence of the dormant virus) later in life. One way to prevent this is to have the shingles vaccine in adulthood. http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/vis/downloads/vis-shingles.pdf Although someone with shingles cannot give shingles to another person, shingles emergence can infect babies causing chickenpox infection which can be life threatening.


Contracting chickenpox virus is generally thought to give good and lasting immunity; however, a small segment of the population is at risk of contracting chickenpox more than once. It is currently thought that there is a genetic component to this for some people. So, no, having chickenpox does not make it certain for everyone that s/he will not contract the virus again.


It's only better to have had chickenpox in childhood if you're not one of the unlucky ones that ends up with scars, pneumonia, or permanent cerebellar ataxia of the brain. And you'll possibly end up needing a shingles vaccine in adulthood anyway.


The CDC webpages have more info http://www.cdc.gov/chickenpox/about/overview.html .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Indeed ianr, I didn't have time to include all Royal Mail options, thanks for that extra bit, they have been spot on for me, I use them a lot and have never had any issues with delivery, touch wood!
    • People are switching to electric cars irrespective of fuel prices.  100s of millions that could be spent on hospitals and schools for example have been lost due to fuel duty freezes and a supposedly temporary reduction.  Fuel is relatively cheap at the moment.  With a stonking majority when is it time to rightly take on motorists? Farming, I simply referred to Paul Johnson of the IFS who knows more about the economy that you, I and Truss will ever know. Food?  Au contraire.  It's too cheap, too poor quality and our farmers are squeezed by the supermarkets and unnatural desire to keep it cheap.  A lot less takeaways and more home cooking with decent often home produced, food should benefit most in our society. Be honest you do t like Labour. 
    • In fact there was a promotional leaflet came through the letter box today, for sending by RM's parcel post by buying online.  There are also options mentioned for having the labels printed  at a Collect+ store or at a Parcel Locker.  More info at https://www.royalmail.com/.
    • Is it? Let's see  Farming is a tough gig with increasingly lower returns, if farms have to sell off land to pay inheritance tax it will reduce their ability to survive. Which in real terms could mean more farm land lost and more reliance on imported food which sees money flowing out, not in to the country.  But I guess as long as you get cheap food that doesn't concern you 😉  Lol "what about the cars"  again Mal... like a broken record....  Governments know that squeezing car drivers for more fuel duty will drive down income from taxes as people switch to electric, which would leave them with a black hole in income. Guess the fuel duty is a fine balancing act tiĺl enough electric cars have been sold to raise tax revenue from their use. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...