Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Network Rail plan to terminate all northbound 'Wimbledon Loop' trains via Herne Hill, Loughborough Junction and Elephant & Castle at Blackfriars. No more through services to the city, Farrindgon, St Pancras and beyond; south London is already poorly served by public transport and this will make it considerably worse. There is a campaign to get National Rail to reconsider. Click on this link to see the details of the campaign: https://www.facebook.com/SaveTheThameslink and 'Like' to support them.

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bare in mind that the alternative is currently a

> reduction of services from Peckham Rye / Denmark

> Hill.


I've not seen that in the documentation; do you have a link to that info?

LondonMix Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There have been multiple threads with links to the

> consultation documents here on the forum. Do a

> search of Renata's posts as she has as Peckham's

> councillor has been very involved.


Thanks, I just did. Couldn't see anything on the alternative being a reduction of the Peckham Rye/Denmark Hill services, apart from this http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,933821,946508#msg-946508 which refutes it and no other mention of the Facebook campaign.

Here is the relevant thread http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,921668


The Wimbledon (Herne hill) loop is likely to be axed for logistics but they are campaigining against this. If they are sucessful, the Peckham service would have to go instead.




1865 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LondonMix Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > There have been multiple threads with links to

> the

> > consultation documents here on the forum. Do

> a

> > search of Renata's posts as she has as

> Peckham's

> > councillor has been very involved.

>

> Thanks, I just did. Couldn't see anything on the

> alternative being a reduction of the Peckham

> Rye/Denmark Hill services, apart from this

> http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5

> ,933821,946508#msg-946508 which refutes it and no

> other mention of the Facebook campaign.

this post about the Southwark Rail Users Group (SRUG) comments might also be useful to read: http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,944735,946714#msg-946714


SRUG's comments cover the issues raised by the Thameslink consultation for users of rail services from the stations Nunhead, Peckham Rye, Denmark Hill, North Dulwich, East Dulwich, Queens Rd Peckham, South Bermondsey. See here for copy of the comments: http://www.bellenden.net/sites/default/files/SRUG%20response%20to%20DfT%20Thameslink-Southern%20Franchise%20consultation%202012.pdf

Page 5 covers particularly the Wimbledon Loop questions.


It is important for users who value the direct connections to St Pancras from Nunhead, Peckham Rye or Denmark Hill to email their comments to DfT before 14 September, focussing on their use of the service and why it is valuable and important to them. All relevant weblinks are in the post mentioned above.

There's an article in today's "Southwark News" (Dulwich & Herne Hill edition) entitled "Huge public outcry adds extra time to train cut consultation". This includes the sentence "The service through Herne Hill, Elephant and Castle and Blackfriars into central London faces the axe from 2018 as part of a shake up of the [Thameslink] network - with services from Denmark Hill and Peckham Rye also facing uncertainty".


This is surely badly worded, if not misleading, since it could be interpreted as suggesting that the through London services from both Herne Hill and Denmark Hill could be axed, when, as I understand it, it would be only one of these two services that could be taken away, and then for operational reasons.

LondonMix Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Your right. It plays down the fact that the

> stations are actually comepeting with one another

> to maintain their services!


No not quite right. It may be that this is what Network Rail want us all to think. But there are questions about whether their case about a particular capacity limit is correct. See page 5 answers to Qs 18/19 in SRUG's submission for more info on this. http://www.bellenden.net/sites/default/files/SRUG%20response%20to%20DfT%20Thameslink-Southern%20Franchise%20consultation%202012.pdf I think more will begin to unfold on this point over the next few weeks.

I'm not sure if I have got this right, but isn't the ultimate aim to increase through traffic from London bridge to North London? That would likely benefit more people, I guess. It would certainly take alot of pressure off the Northern Line.


I've always been amazed at how poor the service from London Bridge to Farringdon is, for example. It should be linked up like Charing X - every 5 mins or so.

healey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I've always been amazed at how poor the service

> from London Bridge to Farringdon is, for example.

> It should be linked up like Charing X - every 5

> mins or so.



Given as the only (sensible) route from London Bridge to Farringdon is via Charing Cross, that would result in the scrapping of every other North-South service through Charing Cross. Somehow, I can't see that one getting the thumbs up.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have been using Andy for many years for decorating and general handyman duties. He always does a great job, is very friendly and his prices are competitive. Highly recommend.
    • Money has to be raised in order to slow the almost terminal decline of public services bought on through years of neglect under the last government. There is no way to raise taxes that does not have some negative impacts / trade offs. But if we want public services and infrastructure that work then raise taxes we must.  Personally I'm glad that she is has gone some way to narrowing the inheritance loop hole which was being used by rich individuals (who are not farmers) to avoid tax. She's slightly rebalanced the burden away from the young, putting it more on wealthier pensioners (who let's face it, have been disproportionately protected for many, many years). And the NICs increase, whilst undoubtedly inflationary, won't be directly passed on (some will, some will likely be absorbed by companies); it's better than raising it on employees, which would have done more to depress growth. Overall, I think she's sailed a prudent course through very choppy waters. The electorate needs to get serious... you can't have European style services and US levels of tax. Borrowing for tax cuts, Truss style, it is is not. Of course the elephant in the room (growing ever larger now Trump is in office and threatening tariffs) is our relationship with the EU. If we want better growth, we need a closer relationship with our nearest and largest trading block. We will at some point have to review tax on transport more radically (as we see greater up take of electric vehicles). The most economically rational system would be one of dynamic road pricing. But politically, very difficult to do
    • Labour was right not to increase fuel duty - it's not just motorists it affects, but goods transport. Fuel goes up, inflation goes up. Inflation will go up now anyway, and growth will stagnate, because businesses will pass the employee NIC hikes onto customers.  I think farms should be exempt from the 20% IHT. I don't know any rich famers, only ones who work their fingers to the bone. But it's in their blood and taking that, often multi-generation, legacy out of the family is heart-breaking. Many work to such low yields, and yet they'll often still bring a lamb to the vet, even if the fees are more than the lamb's life (or death) is worth. Food security should be made a top priority in this country. And, even tho the tax is only for farms over £1m, that's probably not much when you add it all up. I think every incentive should be given to young people who want to take up the mantle. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...