Jump to content

Recommended Posts

fishbiscuits Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If Corbyn had been in charge, we'd be in exactly

> the same situation. The only difference is that my

> social media would be full of posts praising our

> PMs leadership, compassion, etc...


There are a few on mine who consistently praise Boris. I remember a government minister (could be Cleverly) a few years ago mentioning that a load of pro government twitter accounts would be coming online the next week - which makes me suspect there's a government bot factory out there :)

I love the impartial nature of this thread

In an area (and on a forum) that largely voted for labour then of course Boris won't be seen to be doing anything right.


But he is being advised by leading scientists, top virologists, experts in their fields and heads of NHS. Some are civil servants but all would be giving exactly the same words of advice regardless of who is in power, be it Tory's , Labour, Lib Dem or the Monster Raving Loony party.


Advice is listened to, cabinet, cobra and sage meetings are held where the advisers are invited to speak and yes the government in power then acts (or not) on the advice.


Kier has the advantage of hindsight , but let's be honest would he have made the same decisions if Labour won the last GE ? My feeling is possibly as he would have been getting exactly the same advice and the leader of the Tory's would be doing the same to try and bring Labour down. Politics is political after all.


The care home issue is a difficult one, the majority are private companies charging an arm and a leg to look after people who are more often than not at the end of life. They have their own procurement people with strong links to the medical and pharmaceutical sectors so why they didn't ask their suppliers for ppe is the real question that should be asked. They are also very experienced with seasonal illnesses in care homes (norovirus, seasonal flu...) where they have isolation and protection procedures. Why weren't they implemented ?


Agreed some homes are council run but again they have the same links / contacts and procedures so why were they not better prepared as an organisation ?


It may be a very black and white view but it is a question that isn't being asked, instead the media have whipped up a frenzy pointing fingers at the government over care home deaths.

The cynical side of me also thinks that there may be a collective sigh of relief by relatives who are no longer paying up to 8 grand a month to have someone looked after because the family couldn't or wouldn't. (Just my opinion here)


So my answer to the question is and based on the fact that the advisers and advice given would be the same "yes, as fit as any other PM would be in the same situation of a global pandemic that no one saw coming"

I'm willing to bet any other Prime Minister (even if it was Jeremy Hunt instead of Boris Johnson) would have been at those earlier Cobra meetings and would have taken the threat more seriously


Another Prime Minister would have taken the advice of scientists etc more seriously an, critically, they would have observed what was happening in other countries and heeded the warnings and advice from there as well


Another Prime Minister wouldn't have been advised NOT to shake hands and then go on television to advise the nation he would be shaking hands


It's a horrble situation for any government to face but the notion that noone could have done better than Johnson beggars belief, frankly

No-One knows- and it was oh so predictable that a Momentum-inspired bs thread would be created on here. The arrogance of you people thinking you know better than anyone else. AND we should maybe have followed the example of germany -a country that followed a nationalistic path (what else is new!) and we were disadvantaged from day 1

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/16/world/europe/coronavirus-antibody-test-uk.html

Sephiroth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's a horrble situation for any government to

> face but the notion that noone could have done

> better than Johnson beggars belief, frankly



Although this discussion is all based on speculation and theory as no one else is actually prime minister so it's easy to point fingers at Boris. If someone else was prime minister my feeling is that they would make just as many , but possibly not the same ones

Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sephiroth Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > It's a horrble situation for any government to

> > face but the notion that noone could have done

> > better than Johnson beggars belief, frankly

>

>

> Although this discussion is all based on

> speculation and theory as no one else is actually

> prime minister so it's easy to point fingers at

> Boris. If someone else was prime minister my

> feeling is that they would make just as many , but

> possibly not the same ones



But he was very divisive on his way to power - but then Theresa May also ended up being divisive by being indecisive. DO we have any leaders who could being consensus?.

Being offered advice by science and choosing whether to take it, are two different things. Government is engaged in balancing public health vs economy and given that different political parties have different views on what matters most within an economy, it is only logical to argue that a different party or different leadership for that matter, may have had a different approach. Whether or not that would have led to different outcomes is unknowable.


Boris himself said in an interview that he did not take the virus seriously enough in the beginning. HE said that. He also said that getting in and almost dying is what made him realise he was wrong. That is pretty clear for everyone to comprehend. We have the highest death toll in Europe for a reason. We need to understand why.


My view is this. We have been impacted in exactly the same ways as every country that failed to respond fast enough in the beginning. We are seeing the same trajectories as everywhere else, with the same spread of age and demographic impact. There is only one differential. The speed and extent of response between countries. Lives absolutely could have been saved with an earlier response and better preparation. At the same time, lives absolutely were saved by the speed with which the NHS was geared up. But that all should have happened earlier. Lack of national stocks of PPE (something that should be in place at all times) absolutely lies at this government's door. They directed funding away from maintaining those supplies into no deal Brexit preparations. There is no getting away from that.

Sephiroth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The Cat is many things. But anywhere close to

> being a momentum supporter? As if

>

> What a post glen. Amazing. (Not in a good way)


Unc is so wrapped up in his racist/xenophobic culture war that any post he perceives as being negative to 'his side' must automatically be on the 'other side'. Subjectivity has long since left the building.

In 20 years time he'll be discovered ranting away in some dark, dingy corner of the web, like a 21st Century version of a holed-up Viet Cong hiding in the jungle still fighting the Americans...

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sephiroth Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > The Cat is many things. But anywhere close to

> > being a momentum supporter? As if

> >

> > What a post glen. Amazing. (Not in a good way)

>

> Unc is so wrapped up in his racist/xenophobic

> culture war that any post he perceives as being

> negative to 'his side' must automatically be on

> the 'other side'. Subjectivity has long since left

> the building.

> In 20 years time he'll be discovered ranting away

> in some dark, dingy corner of the web, like a 21st

> Century version of a holed-up Viet Cong hiding in

> the jungle still fighting the Americans...



It's funny you know. I took a bit of care to make sure the OP was worded as neutrally as possible. And also make clear that I was specifically talking about his health, not anything else.


But people on both 'sides' read something not in 100percent agreement with their own view...and conclude it must be from the 'other' side.....


Seph....who knew I was a closet momentum activist?:)...not even me apparently....

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Being offered advice by science and choosing

> whether to take it, are two different things.

> Government is engaged in balancing public health

> vs economy and given that different political

> parties have different views on what matters most

> within an economy, it is only logical to argue

> that a different party or different leadership for

> that matter, may have had a different approach.

> Whether or not that would have led to different

> outcomes is unknowable.

>

> Boris himself said in an interview that he did not

> take the virus seriously enough in the beginning.

> HE said that. He also said that getting in and

> almost dying is what made him realise he was

> wrong. That is pretty clear for everyone to

> comprehend. We have the highest death toll in

> Europe for a reason. We need to understand why.

>

> My view is this. We have been impacted in exactly

> the same ways as every country that failed to

> respond fast enough in the beginning. We are

> seeing the same trajectories as everywhere else,

> with the same spread of age and demographic

> impact. There is only one differential. The speed

> and extent of response between countries. Lives

> absolutely could have been saved with an earlier

> response and better preparation. At the same time,

> lives absolutely were saved by the speed with

> which the NHS was geared up. But that all should

> have happened earlier. Lack of national stocks of

> PPE (something that should be in place at all

> times) absolutely lies at this government's door.

> They directed funding away from maintaining those

> supplies into no deal Brexit preparations. There

> is no getting away from that.


Spot on!

How the bloody hell can you title something 'Is Boris Fit To Lead' on the East Dulwich Forum and not expect lefty anti-government comments- for heaven's sake ED is the heart of champagne socialist London or hadn't you noticed....it was deliberate- and if it wasn't ...no- it was deliberate.

Anyway as someone pointed out -Boris was out jogging (in this heat he should get a medal)....and I'm sure he is on Doctor's orders

TheCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> diable rouge Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Sephiroth Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > The Cat is many things. But anywhere close

> to

> > > being a momentum supporter? As if

> > >

> > > What a post glen. Amazing. (Not in a good

> way)

> >

> > Unc is so wrapped up in his racist/xenophobic

> > culture war that any post he perceives as being

> > negative to 'his side' must automatically be on

> > the 'other side'. Subjectivity has long since

> left

> > the building.

> > In 20 years time he'll be discovered ranting

> away

> > in some dark, dingy corner of the web, like a

> 21st

> > Century version of a holed-up Viet Cong hiding

> in

> > the jungle still fighting the Americans...

>

> > It's funny you know. I took a bit of care to make

> sure the OP was worded as neutrally as possible.

> And also make clear that I was specifically

> talking about his health, not anything else.

>

> But people on both 'sides' read something not in

> 100percent agreement with their own view...and

> conclude it must be from the 'other' side.....

>

> Seph....who knew I was a closet momentum

> activist?:)...not even me apparently....


It's the term 'fit', we use 'fit' for sports people. Is he or she fit enough to play this weekend. Otherwise fit will be are they capable of the job - it the England manager fit to control the national team? Otherwise we'd say are they well enough to come back to work. Ironically all the issues you have raised with BoJo's fitness fit (another use) with many of our views that he is not capable. Come on you did tease us. As for his physical fitness it was crazy that he continued when he was so ill. Crazy. The Queen failed in her duty of care to the head of the country, and the country as a whole.

He is demonstrably untrustworthy. At a time of national emergency, you need people to have trust and confidence in the government and the advice it is giving, if they are going to effectively manage the crisis. I'm not sure what you mean by 'fit', but he's not the person I want in charge right now. Still, at least we don't have Trump I guess.

Look...now that this thread has moved on from his health (was that always my intention?:))....yes, mistakes have been made. But not every move they make is disastrous/incompetent/malicious.


I think that whoever was in Gov at this moment would cop a kicking. For Tory haters, it's evidence of their lack of compassion. If labour was in power, labour haters would be kicking them for being economically incompetent.


So really....it's just politics as usual....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...