Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I know it's supposed to be good for the trees, but this brutal amputation of these beautiful trees that were looking absolutely wonderful - and so uplifting to the spirits - has depressed me immeasurably. Did it REALLY have to be done now, when we are in the middle of an apocalypse and just trying to hold on to our stiff upper lips and keep smiling? And what about the nesting birds? They don't stand a chance. This is the first time in the last few weeks that I've nearly cried, and I probably will before I go to bed tonight. SOOOOOOOOO thoughtless and un-empathetic from the council.

treehugger - you and me both . If they'd been done in the winter ,there would have been the canopy to enjoy the previous summer and a little new growth by now .


the contractors say they have to look out for nests ,but I'm pretty sure they don't .

Slarti - standard and necessary procedure I grant you but should be done in winter .And still results in a brutal presentation .


"Pollarding should happen when the tree is dormant, in winter, when its leaves have fallen. This allows the tree surgeons to manoeuvre more easily around the tree and see the shape more clearly, it causes less disturbance to resident wildlife and less stress to the tree as there is minimal loss of sap"



which incidentally would be less aesthetically brutal ,less stress for me .Going from fresh glorious green leaves to brown stumps ,heartbreaking .Not to mention the destruction of bird nests .


first world problem I know

I noticed 4 trees removed on the 10 minute walk from my house to ED station a couple months ago. 1 due to insurance, the others for "weak fork" or "imbalanced". The notices all state that a replacement tree will be planted nearby asap. Does anyone know if this is actually done in practice? I recall a couple trees removed from LL a year ago and it doesn't seem that they were ever replaced.

It's a shame that this pollarding is happening again so late in the spring... I sorted this out ages ago, but I don't have the same influence now that I'm not a councillor anymore.


I understand that there are longterm tree maintenance issues due to budget cuts over the years, which are now being addressed, but we have a whole new tree team which isn't familiar with the area, so I suspect they are simply repeating past maintenance programs.


I would suggest calling the council's 020 7525 5000 number and making an Environmental complaint by phone (be sure to get a reference number) and request that a tree officer contact you (request an email). The council's new website complaints system appears to be dysfunctional, so try the phone first.


If you see distressed birds, then call the RSPB for advice and report the council.


Can you update us as things progress?

devin... I'm still trying to lobby for tree planting in Goose Green ward, but it's difficult due to time constraints.


I'm aware of the 2 trees on Lordship Lane, which I've repeatedly lobbied to have replaced... I was told that this would happen this spring, but I suspect that the Covid-19 issues have reduced capacity during this planting season.


Can you also tell me roughly where the 4 trees on the way to ED station are, as I'm also working on replacing some of those, but I can't tell which road you are referring to in your above post.


Tree maintenance and replacements are happening bit by bit, when funds are available... I recently applied for CGS funding and some specialist maintenance work in Goose Green ward, but none of the tree bids appear to have been approved by councillors. So, I'm going to try to find another way of accessing funds.


Also... if anyone lives near a newly planted tree, then it would be really useful to water it in this dry weather. Unfortunately, the blasted green bags around the tree make it more difficult to water, but try to persevere!

Hi, thanks... I don't usually cut through that area (I usually walk straight through Melbourne), but I'll go have a look during one of my daily walks. I seem to remember various tree issues being very contentious around there, but we've been experimenting with smaller trees that don't block the pavement or block the light. At minimum I can try to check with the tree officer what replacements are being considered.

I suggest writing directly by email to Southwark?s new chief arboricultural officer, Julian Fowgies

[email protected]

There are trees being pollarded all over south Camberwell too. This is not right, it is not acceptable and the more of us bring it to his attention, the more likely the Council is to take notice.

Not only is it nesting season, pollarding will also rob us all of the canopy cover we need in early summer for cooling and to mitigate against pollution.

This late spring is a terrible practice, the Council should pollard only between November and March.

Yes late autumn or early spring- which Julian Fowgies does know about as he was giving instruction on it when he was in Bromley so there is no point contacting him as he's forgotten everything he ever knew!

https://www.ravensbournevalley.org/tree-news.php

All the more reason to remind him I would have thought! To pollard in late spring is a practice he should be keen to stop to. Pursuing it, in the face of such public disapprobation, in a Climate Emergency and in lockdown, is a terrible look for the trees department.

I will be complaining too.


There is a thread on twitter regarding more pollarding by Southwark in Bermondsey, and there is a video of them pollarding a tree with a live nest!

According to the Twitter thread, as a result Southwark have confirmed that ALL Pollarding will cease until November.


I really don't understand why pollarding needs to occur in (late) Spring... surely it should only happen from late Autumn to Winter anyway?

Is this just rogue contractors generating revenue by insisting it needs doing?

Swift reply from Julian Fowgies



"Thank you for your email.




I can confirm that routine pollarding/re-pollarding works have now been suspended until November. There are unfortunately a few trees that we have to work on prior to this in the interest of maintaining public safety and specific cases of subsidence damage mitigation (2 trees to be subject to removal owing to extensive basal decay/ 1 tree to be subject to crown reduction works associated with a subsidence case).




As you may be aware subsidence damage to properties has been a particular issue on Barry Road for a considerable number of years. This has been exacerbated in recent years owing to a lack of tree maintenance undertaken in order to manage water demand. During the 2020/21 winter period we will be resuming re-pollarding works on Barry Road (and many others in the vicinity where London Clay is dominant) and will continue to manage the trees on a 2 yearly cycle in order to limit occurrences of future damage to properties and the associated inconvenience experienced by residents.




I do appreciate your concerns with regards to crown retention and the associated environmental benefits with this approach and will adopt this wherever possible.




As part of their pre-works assessment of trees contractors must undertake a wildlife check to ensure that no active nests are present. Disturbing nesting birds is an offence under the Wildlife and Countryside Act and as such I am very interested to be informed of any potential breaches to this.




Next week we will be undertaking on site talks with all of our operatives in order to reiterate what is expected of them in this and other respects."

" This [subsidence]" has been exacerbated in recent years owing to a lack of tree maintenance undertaken in order to manage water demand. "


does this mean that tree maintenance reduces uptake of water and as a consequence reduces subsidence So less tree maintenance = more subsidence ?

I can understand all this to minimise subsidence but why in Dulwich Park?? Some trees have been felled and hideously pollarded at Queen Mary's Gate, miles away from any buildings. It seems to me that there is always some so called "expert" usually with a financial interest more than ready and willing to maim and destroy mature and flourishing trees on any feeble excuse.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...