Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I remain confused about why people jogging have less right to be on a footpath than walkers? Of course everyone should be be considerate but why shouldn't joggers be on a footpath? Apparently the speed someone is moving by foot dictates whether their foot is eligible for the path?


Where does that leave fast walkers?

binkylilyput Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I remain confused about why people jogging have

> less right to be on a footpath than walkers? Of

> course everyone should be be considerate but why

> shouldn't joggers be on a footpath? Apparently the

> speed someone is moving by foot dictates whether

> their foot is eligible for the path?

>

> Where does that leave fast walkers?


How do you think joggers should be considerate? Wear a mask or avoid going close to people?

Who said it's about rights ?

I'd suggest it's more about courtesy of a shared space.

This has all been done to death in the Spring in other threads on EDF, it's all there.


binkylilyput Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I remain confused about why people jogging have

> less right to be on a footpath than walkers? Of

> course everyone should be be considerate but why

> shouldn't joggers be on a footpath? Apparently the

> speed someone is moving by foot dictates whether

> their foot is eligible for the path?

>

> Where does that leave fast walkers?

I've enjoyed this thread due to the vociferous comments, particularly in the early days of lockdown, and that joggers became public enemy number 1 as opposed to cyclists. My objective view is that many are obsessed with personal bests and the tracking apps, and occasionally wont give way/give space. It happened a couple of times on the railway bridge, cyclists like me walking their bikes, parents with young children some with prams, all trying to give space and then a jogger runs through the tight gap brushing by others. Wonker. But not sure if that is 5, 55 or 95% of joggers. It's usually a bloke thing too, the competitive element

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yep.

>

> wordsworth Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > KidKruger Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > pepper spray. sorted.

> >

> >

> > Is that supposed to be funny?



Phew, felt confused.

For me it's not a jogger vs pedestrian issue. It's more of a 'people not being dicks' issue.


Unfortunately most people out there - whether they've moving 12km/h or 5km/h - seem to be in a world of their own and have no interest in keeping alert and cooperating to give each other space.

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My objective view is that many are obsessed with personal bests

> and the tracking apps, and occasionally wont give

> way/give space. It happened a couple of times on

> the railway bridge, cyclists like me walking their

> bikes, parents with young children some with

> prams, all trying to give space and then a jogger

> runs through the tight gap brushing by others.

> Wonker. But not sure if that is 5, 55 or 95% of

> joggers. It's usually a bloke thing too, the

> competitive element


I think that's more or less fair. If you want to bust out a PB, there's a time and place. Laps of Dulwich Park, or going out late at night for instance. Not during the day on busy pavements. Everyone (including joggers/runners) need to be prepared to step out into the road or to wait between parked cars to let others by.


The selfish, stupid joggers are probably more like 50% than 5%. But I'd also suggest that completely gormless pedestrians not giving others space (staring at their phones, walking three abreast, or walking straight down the middle of the pavement) are of at least a similar ratio.

In deed, there should be a pavement code for pedestrians, who should wear lights including brake lights, have mirrors, and indicate. I've posted this before, but only semi facetious ie how many times have you almost walked into someone who suddenly stops to check a text, or have to suddenly brake as someone crosses the road without looking on their headphones.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I think it's connected with the totem pole renovation celebrations They have passed now, but the notice has been there since then (at least that's when I first saw it - I passed it on the 484 and also took a photo!)
    • Labour was damned, no matter what it did, when it came to the budget. It loves go on about the black hole, but if Labour had had its way, we'd have been in lockdown for longer and the black hole would be even bigger.  Am I only the one who thinks it's time the NHS became revenue-generating? Not private, but charging small fees for GP appts, x-rays etc? People who don't turn up for GP and out-patient appointments should definitely be charged a cancellation fee. When I lived in Norway I got incredible medical treatment, including follow up appointments, drugs, x-rays, all for £200. I was more than happy to pay it and could afford to. For fairness, make it somehow means-tested.  I am sure there's a model in there somewhere that would be fair to everyone. It's time we stopped fetishising something that no longer works for patient or doctor.  As for major growth, it's a thing of the past, no matter where in the world you live, unless it's China. Or unless you want a Truss-style, totally de-regulated economy and love capitalism with a large C. 
    • If you read my post I expect a compromise with the raising of the cap on agricultural property so that far less 'ordinary' farmers do not get caught  Clarkson is simply a high profile land owner who is not in the business as a conventional farmer.  Here's a nice article that seems to explain things well  https://www.sustainweb.org/blogs/nov24-farming-budget-inheritance-tax-apr/ It's too early to speculate on 2029.  I expect that most of us who were pleased that Labour got in were not expecting anything radical. Whilst floating the idea of hitting those looking to minimise inheritance tax, including gifting, like fuel duty they also chickened put. I'm surprised that anyone could start touting for the Tories after 14 years of financial mismanagement and general incompetence. Surly not.  A very low bar for Labour but they must be well aware that there doesn't need to be much of a swing form Reform to overturn Labour's artificially large majority.  But even with a generally rabid right wing press, now was the opportunity to be much braver.
    • And I worry this Labour government with all of it's own goals and the tax increases is playing into Farage's hands. With Trump winning in the US, his BFF Farage is likely to benefit from strained relations between the US administration and the UK one. As Alastair Campbell said on a recent episode of The Rest is Politics who would not have wanted to be a fly on the wall of the first call between Angela Rayner and JD Vance....those two really are oil and water. Scary, scary times right now and there seems to be a lack of leadership and political nous within the government at a time when we really need it - there aren't many in the cabinet who you think will play well on the global stage.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...