Jump to content

who is the most musically creative person in the industry


Recommended Posts

Like em or loathe them you have to at least consider lennon/mccartney (as a partnership, not individually)


I can't say there's a whole lot in the prince / 0|-x-> canon that's great. Reinvention can't be everything else we'd have love Madonna too, who did one class (eponymous)album, and masses of dross. *ducks for cover too*

Can of worms this one ;-)


To say consistently creative we need to be talking about people with a body of work stretching back some time - say the 70s early 80s? as the latest they started producing albums but they can have started as early as they were born. So... Leonard Cohen yes, Boyzone no


Later periods for most of these artists usually polarise opinion - Dylan/Prince/Bowie/Young fans etc might care to disagree but be aware of the notion. And people who aren't even fans of a given artist's peak work are unlikely to give due consideration to the "lesser" albums


As a massive Prince fan I would say he has excelled live over the decade but his recorded output knows no such quality control


I'm going to plump for Bowie - an awful awful awful 10 years from 83-93 (with a few noteable exceptions) turned things around, not with Black Tie White Noise but The Buddah of Suburbia album. Up there with any of the "Berlin" albums for me


Thereafter we get 1.Outside and the Earthling albums - seriously deranged and energetic in equal measure. A blip with "hours" in 99 but then Heathen in 2002 is in my top 5



I expect everyone to disagree with me but I can easily talk at some length about this so be warned

Actually I largely agree with you Sean. To me Bowie WAS the 70s as Prince was to a large extent the 80s. If you go back further then the Beatles, the Stones and Dylan were the 60s. They have all gone through their creative peaks and troughs though.
For a more modern day candidate, I have been very impressed with Damon Albarn. I was never the biggest Blur fan, but there were several quality songs and Parklife is a great album. What he has done recently with Gorillaz shows his musical diversity, and therefore in my opinion, I think he is one of the most creative artists at the moment.

Bowie's been my favourite artist since I was about fourteen, though personally, I hate everything after 1983 (with the slight exception of the song Absolute Beginners). Still, he made about a dozen of my favourite albums, and no other artist can come close to that - my top ten:


Diamond Dogs

Hunky Dory

Station to Station

Low

Heroes

Lodger

Young Americans

Ziggy Stardust

David Bowie

Man Who Sold The World

I agree with you Gerrard, I'm actually a big fan of Albarn as an artist too. He's certainly grown. I had to film his GBQ (The good, The Bad, The Queen) gig in the Tower of London last year and I thought it was fantastic. He's also composed a chinese opera recently, Monkey and even scored a movie (Ravenous) with Michael Nyman. Doing well that lad.
I agree with what you are saying about young Damon. You've also forgotten about his African collaborations, his record label Honest Jons and....well the boy is doing well isn't he. He was certainly shall we say the latter part of the 90s.

For consistency and longevity I'd be remiss not to mention Yo La Tengo, it'd be sinful not to, but they don't do reinvention much.

Albums each have a consistent sound, and they can do quiet, touching, mournful, RAWK, happy, noisy, chilled, but their overall sounds haven't budged much over 25 odd years.


snippets


Tom Courtenay

Blue Line Swinger (live)

The Summer

Blinder


The phenomonen you mention re: Bowie (nothing good after 83) is one that is so prevelant I despair sometimes. That 10 year trough (good word Jah) was, by his standards, awful but even then gems such as Absolute Beginners and even Loving the Alien were knocking around


If you haven't heard Buddah of Suburbia the I will have to fix that.


If you have heard Heathen and can't see it compares with most of his 70s work than I'm convinced the 80s just hacked you off too much you have switched off - but it is a fantastic album.


Earthling from 97 probably tried too hard but I listend to it again the other day and it fair BRISTLES with energy



Trev


Has Stevie done a similar arc, and moved on from Ebony & Ivory and I Just Called...?

Sean - no, probably hard to defend much after 1980 (Hotter Than July), apart from 2005's A Time To Love which was pretty well received. But hey, who knows - maybe his arc is just beginning its belated upward curve?


Even if it isn't, a high percentage of his output from the mid '60s up until 1980 should make him a serious contender for '(previously) most musically creative person (still working) in the industry'.

David Byrne? Been at it for years and keeps producing quality, if not exactly mainstream.


Phil Collins, great drummer and even did some pretty good stuff with Genesis (and some rubbish). But really, come on, solo?

McDonalds is commercially successful, but that doesn't make it good does it?


Ooh, Peter Gabriel was good for about 20 years (again, including genesis).

Try Smokie Robinson - The man was respsnsible for many of motowns greatest hits. Prince is a pale imitation of cross between Jimi Hendrix and James Brown. Stevie Wonder knocks prince into a rasperry beret. Phil Collins creative??? He's about as creative as a paint by numbers set.

I think Radiohead have made certainly some influential albums, The Bends and OK Computer spring to mind, but you could also say that about, say, Coldplay for example. Everyone sounds like them now.


How about Sting?


Or even Chas & Dave?

Springsteen.


Going strong for 30 years with no real trough to speak of.


1970s - Born to Run; Darkness on the Edge of Town


1980s - The River; Nebraska;Born in the USA


1990s - The Ghost of Tom Joad plus Philadelphia


2000s - Devils and Dust; the new album, Magic


Not too shabby.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I went to France recently and in the city I visited there were large billboards on the main streets urging people to stop their dogs from messing on the streets and in a little park a sign said something to the effect that this park was built for your enjoyment not as a dumping ground for dog mess. There were also big signs about not fly tipping. I wonder if councils are too worried about offending dog owners by making a fuss about this major problem. I was a dog owner for many years, got free bags from the council and there were even bins around then.
    • I was also woken by this. It happened in two bursts, which felt even more anti social.
    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...