Jump to content

"I'd rather be ruled by a bunch of capitalists than a bunch of bureaucrats" Discuss


Recommended Posts

Many moons ago in the bourgoeis radicalism of my student common room I remember my contemperaries and I discussing the virtues of socialism when, Mark, the son of a plumber from Woking, came out with this. Struck me then, still does nowadays. I'm more scared of big states than big business by miles.

I don't really understand the differentiation?


A successful big business in its prime is indistinguishable from a totalitarian state - with centralised economic control, personality cults, workforce regimentation, control of media and so on.


A big business past its prime is indistinguishable from a bureaucracy - with factionalisation, productivity issues, poor internal communication and all the rest that goes with it.


Most states function on a dynamic equilibrium between the social and corporate elements.


It's notable that in some contexts if the social safety net of the 'state' is taken away, effective companies may take on the role of providing a conducive working environment - for example at Cadbury's, Bourneville, pensions, education and healthcare came part and parcel with the corporate offering.


This seems more likely to take place in companies that have a long term vision - executives with short term objectives are more likely to asset strip today's infrastructure to generate immediate cash returns at the cost of long term growth.


It wasn't democratic though, it was more of a Platonic construct.


I guess there isn't any particular evidence that Democracies are the most effective form of government.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have been using Andy for many years for decorating and general handyman duties. He always does a great job, is very friendly and his prices are competitive. Highly recommend.
    • Money has to be raised in order to slow the almost terminal decline of public services bought on through years of neglect under the last government. There is no way to raise taxes that does not have some negative impacts / trade offs. But if we want public services and infrastructure that work then raise taxes we must.  Personally I'm glad that she is has gone some way to narrowing the inheritance loop hole which was being used by rich individuals (who are not farmers) to avoid tax. She's slightly rebalanced the burden away from the young, putting it more on wealthier pensioners (who let's face it, have been disproportionately protected for many, many years). And the NICs increase, whilst undoubtedly inflationary, won't be directly passed on (some will, some will likely be absorbed by companies); it's better than raising it on employees, which would have done more to depress growth. Overall, I think she's sailed a prudent course through very choppy waters. The electorate needs to get serious... you can't have European style services and US levels of tax. Borrowing for tax cuts, Truss style, it is is not. Of course the elephant in the room (growing ever larger now Trump is in office and threatening tariffs) is our relationship with the EU. If we want better growth, we need a closer relationship with our nearest and largest trading block. We will at some point have to review tax on transport more radically (as we see greater up take of electric vehicles). The most economically rational system would be one of dynamic road pricing. But politically, very difficult to do
    • Labour was right not to increase fuel duty - it's not just motorists it affects, but goods transport. Fuel goes up, inflation goes up. Inflation will go up now anyway, and growth will stagnate, because businesses will pass the employee NIC hikes onto customers.  I think farms should be exempt from the 20% IHT. I don't know any rich famers, only ones who work their fingers to the bone. But it's in their blood and taking that, often multi-generation, legacy out of the family is heart-breaking. Many work to such low yields, and yet they'll often still bring a lamb to the vet, even if the fees are more than the lamb's life (or death) is worth. Food security should be made a top priority in this country. And, even tho the tax is only for farms over £1m, that's probably not much when you add it all up. I think every incentive should be given to young people who want to take up the mantle. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...