Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have finally succumbed to the idea that my daughter will benefit from a mobile when she starts secondary school in Sept.


However want to go down the 'cheap as chips' route rather than the Blackberry / iPhone route.


Would love to hear recommendations for good phones and/or network deals. Also thinking pay as you go probably better than contract?


Thanks in advance.

I've just got my daughter a blackberry on contract as she's starting secondary school to in sept.

She gets 200 mins unlimited texts a month. It's not a lot of minutes really but she sends txt and bbm more than anything. It's ?20 a month and it works out cheaper contract than pay as you go. Just depends on how much she talks!!


Also conditions were that she has to pay the bill herself by doing housework and all the money she tends to get of her grandparents etc.


Thought it might teach her a bit of responsibility and when she's in trouble I know the punishment of having her phone taken of her will be huge for her.


I actually think Charter don't allow phones anyway. But after school I'm sure she will want to be phoning new friends she's made.

Each to there own really.


Vanessa

We just went to the Orange shop (Lewisham) and got their cheapest, most basic, phone with the longest battery life on pay as you go (Samsung, but bought so long ago the model probably doesn't exist now).

It's worked brilliantly. We now have two of these and the kids take "the cheap phone" whenever they go out in preference to their (purchased themselves) iPhone and blackberries (which now are so much more about multi-media use now than use as mere phones).

My children are aged 12 - 19 and the other huge positive of having the cheap phone (and one I had not planned for and wouldn't have given huge consideration to in any case) is the status thing.

By absolutely having the most bog-standard cheap phone you have a perfect counter argument to the "Wot no blackberry?" pressure cos you are so obviously not even trying to compete and have a decent phone. You are just bringing out the cheap phone to prevent loss of or damage to your better phone at home!

Yes - The Charter don't allow phones. But the pupils all take them in and I encourage my kids to take them on some days cos if they are going out after school (and sometimes not home till late) I need to know we can contact each other.

So - if the school confiscate it - it's only the cheap phone!

And - it gets nicked at school (and they do and of course the school can't be expected to do anything about it cos phones aren't allowed) - it's only the cheap phone!

And - the kids aren't stressing about loss or theft cos - it's only the cheap phone!

And actually neither of the phones have been lost, stolen or broken - yet..

?20 a month? Flippin eck!


Our boys (12 & 15) use mostly PAYG cheapies via orange & it costs us about ?10 every couple of months per phone - often less. They're not too fussed about phones & definitely don't have fancy ones at home. Girl (16) uses old iphone given her by her uncle & is on a ?5.20 per month simplicity tariff at O2: 300mins unlimited text a month.


Our experience so far is that The Charter wouldn't confiscate a phone unless it rang in class or a student was caught using it in school hours - fair enough really.


Personally I wouldn't go down the contract route, but we are watching the pennies. As vanessa520 says - each to their own.

Hi Mrs TP - two years ago, when my youngest daughter was starting secondary school, I would not have even thought of getting her a mobile phone.


Fast forward two years and it's a different world.


Yes vanessa and vesti - The Charter School don't allow mobiles so I go along with that policy.


Daughter (nearly 14) and her older sister (16) have their mobiles (cheap ones) and my 19 year old son who still has a 5 year old mobile but he doesn't care, but I DON'T let them take mobiles to school as I know they're not allowed (The Charter School). Occasionally I've let them take their mobiles on a half inset day if they suddenly decide to go to to a friends or whatever.


But if they did go to a friends(or whatever) on a normal day after school they know they to have to ask to use the parents landline/mobile to phone me (a normal thing anyway, otherwise I would be phoning round their friends to their embarrasment).

Many thanks to all for responses esp 'intexasatthe moment' - defo the sort of thing I'm looking for and will investigate further.


We are not at Charter but our new big school has a 'no see no hear' policy to electronics so is slightly more relaxed. I didn't even particularly want to get her a phone yet but someone pointed out what if my plans suddenly change due to needs of younger children and I am not where she expects.


I think the particular thing about Charter is it has such a tight catchment area so most children walk and their friends all live in a relatively close area so perhaps more relaxed re need for a phone for school if your child good at keeping you informed generally.


My daughter is going to a school that has a much wider catchment, the majority of children don't live close enough to walk and friends will be further spread out. A wider roaming area from home and public transport have all added to the phone consideration :(


Really hoping the Blackberry days are on the v. distant horizon :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Why on earth is there so much interest, and negativity, after a 100 days of a Labour government when we had 1000s of days of dreadful government before this with hardly a chat on this Website?  What is it that is suddenly so much greater interest? Here's part of a list of what they have done in a 100 days - it's from a Labour MP so obviously there is some bias, and mainly new Bills so yet to deliver/put into law.  This reminds me of the US election where the popular view was that Biden had achieved nothing, rather than leading the recovery after Covid, a fairer tax system, housing, supporting workers, dealing with community unrest following high profile racist incidents,  So if we think Starmer is ineffective and Labour incompetent then we are all going to believe it? I do feel sick after seeing Clarkson on Newsnight, playing to the gallery.  Surely Trump must have a high profile role for him on the environment and climate change  
    • Hi looking for a shed for my allotment. Can pick up
    • But do you not understand how tough farming is, especially post-Brexit when some of the subsidies were lost and costs have increased massively yet the prices farmers can charge has not? On the BBC News tonight they said pig farming costs had gone up 54% since 2019, cow farming costs up 44% and cereal costs up 43%. The NFU said that the margins are on average 0.5% return on capital. Land and buildings are assets that don't make money until you sell them...it's what you do with them that makes money and farms are struggling to make money and so many farms are generational family businesses so never realise the assets (one farmers on the news said his farm had been in the family since 1822) but will have to to pay tax for continuing the family business. On another news item tonight there was a short piece saying the government has said that 50,000 more pensioners will be forced into relative poverty (60% of the average income) due to the Winter Fuel Allowance removal which will rise to 100,000 more by 2027. James Murray from the Treasury was rolled out on Newsnight to try and defend that and couldn't. You can't give doctors 20%+ and push more pensioners into poverty as a result.  The problem for Labour is the court of public opinion will judge them and right now the jury is out after a series of own-goals, really poor communication and ill-thought-out idealogical policies. And don't ever annoy the farmers.....;-)  
    • That % of “affected” doesn’t mean they are all in deep trouble.  It means this will touch on them in some small way mostly - apart from the biggest farms  it’s like high rate tax earners taking to the street when Osborne dragged child/benefit claimants into self assessment.  A mild pain  the more I read, the more obviously confected it is. Still - just as with farage and his banking “woes”, a social media campaign is no barrier to the gullible  what percentage of farms affected by Brexit and to what degree compared go IHT?  Or does that not matter? Thats different money is it? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...