Jump to content

Recommended Posts

fazer71 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> ?1.2 bn on a media centre !!!!!!!!! FFS total

> insanity ,,, unless someone can explain how that

> number happened?


I have pointed you to a site that a) breaks all this down and b) shows you why that number is wrong.


Hmmm - I am starting to concur with your claim you are not a troll. The other option is looking far more likely.

Fazer won't look at the spending breakdown because it will tell him what he's probably beginning to suspect - that he's talking out of his behind.


I'm particularly impressed by the 'common knowledge' argument - ever the domain of the charlatan. What it actually means is 'me and my mates have started a rumour and if we repeat it enough that makes it true'.

Hugenot

Ahhh you just twist everything into a direct insult you really should stop showing yourself up.

Have you spoken to anyone who worked on the Olympics?

I have, individual contractors they were earning great rates they worked hard and were well paid.

I have a problem with the Companies who employed them who still made excessive profits.



Loz

An argument which can never be won.


The figures will add up and result in ?1.2 Bn for a media centre.

?6.7 Bn total etc etc


If it looks like a duck sounds like a duck it probably is a duck.


I can point you to a legal bill for a contract all that will tell you is what the lawyer charged per hour worked.

It won't compare the hourly charge with another it won't tell you if he actually worked the hours he charged.

It's just a load of numbers which are there to show what was paid and charged.

It won't show if the rate was high or low or exactly how many hours were actually worked.


So to suggest I look at a load of numbers is pretty stupid unless you are able to prove the hours worked and the rates were the market rates.




If my ecomparisons don't mean anything to you fine but even Hugenot was surprised by some of the contract works!


If all you can offer is a link to a load of numbers and you're not bothered to justify those numbers what the F are you replying to my posts for ? Are you stupid?

fazer71 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Loz

> An argument which can never be won.

>

> The figures will add up and result in ?1.2 Bn for a media centre.



No they don't.


Try again.


(Clue: if you click on the pretty circles, magic things happen...)

I've just had a look at the figures, and guess what - fazer is wrong again.


The Shard cost around ?450m for 1,200,000 square feet. That's around ?375 per square foot.


The Olympic Media Centre cost ?350m for 900,000 square feet. That's around ?388 per square foot.


There's nothing in it, the slight additional cost is easily justified by the huge technical demands of outfitting communications technology for 20,000 journalists.


The hourly rate of a lawyer is irrelevant. The claim that fazer made is that the Olympics infrastructure was subject to to price gouging and over charging (and now the accusation of fraud)on behalf of contractors.


In fact we are discovering that the prices, whether compared with the Shard or the Emirate stadium, are nothing of the sort.


What's that smell?

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> fazer71 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > Loz

> > An argument which can never be won.

> >

> > The figures will add up and result in ?1.2 Bn

> for a media centre.

>

>

> No they don't.

>

> Try again.

>

> (Clue: if you click on the pretty circles, magic

> things happen...)


Yes

I know it shows what was spent.

What exactly are you saying I'm missing ?



lpool Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So which of the CLM contractors have told you

> this? Please tell.


Yea right.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The hourly rate of a lawyer is irrelevant. The

> claim that fazer made is that the Olympics

> infrastructure was subject to to price gouging and

> over charging (and now the accusation of fraud)on

> behalf of contractors.


It's not fraud don't be rediculous its the equivalent to weekend rates double the daily or hourly rate.


Ffs Fraud !


How can we continue to discuss this with rediculous comments like this are made?

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I've just had a look at the figures, and guess

> what - fazer is wrong again.

>

> The Shard cost around ?450m for 1,200,000 square

> feet. That's around ?375 per square foot.

>

> The Olympic Media Centre cost ?350m for 900,000

> square feet. That's around ?388 per square foot.

>

> There's nothing in it, the slight additional cost

> is easily justified by the huge technical demands

> of outfitting communications technology for 20,000

> journalists.

>

> The hourly rate of a lawyer is irrelevant. The

> claim that fazer made is that the Olympics

> infrastructure was subject to to price gouging and

> over charging (and now the accusation of fraud)on

> behalf of contractors.

>

> In fact we are discovering that the prices,

> whether compared with the Shard or the Emirate

> stadium, are nothing of the sort.

>

> What's that smell?


Excellent now we're getting somewhere.

I'm more than happy to be proven to be wrong thank you for that information good work, a nice comparison.


The smell could be a personal thing you do appear to be getting rather angry and over reacting maybe causing you to perspire more than usual? Some deodorant or regular showering would sort it out.

If not maybe it a side affect of your rudeness filthy caustic breath or worst... Flatulence ?


Do calm down .


The only issue I've got with those numbers is sqft for sqft the shard given it's cutting edge build could easily cost twice as much to build per sqft when compared to the olympic media centre.


I wonder what will happen to the media centre once the Olympics / Paralympics are over?


Little point in continuing this it's impossible to prove over or under spend but the numbers speak for themselves when compared to other projects what have we got for our money?


In my book It isn't the equivalent to 17 shard towers.

In your book it's the equivalent or more.


What We can all see with total clarity is you are rude insulting and happy to use those traits before engaging your brain which is a pity, once your brain is engaged you achieve rather more impressive results. Although it appears to cause a smell.


Cheers

fazer71 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Yes

> I know it shows what was spent.

> What exactly are you saying I'm missing ?


Then why do you keep quoting weird figures? The media centre did not cost the 1.2bn that you keep complaining about.

That's not the media centre then is it?


You're just adding in bits and bobs until it gets to the figure that you like.


You don't know why the cost went up do you? Instead of finding out you've just christened them all liars and thieves. Bollocks.


Go and break that down and you'll discover that it all makes sense.


Just as you've discovered with everything else. The Emirates stadium bollocks, the Shard bollocks, it's all pointless bollocks.

fazer71 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The media centre village

> Total Media Centre and Media Centre Village

> estimate ?492 million

> actual ?1.23 billion

>

> I'm finished with this it's pointless.


The final cost of building the media centre was ?292m. You're right, it is pointless as you don't understand how the figure breaks down to its components. Substantial money was spent on acquiring the land, CPOs, compensations to local businesses, infrastructure, etc.



The original Nov 07 estimates for building media centre and olympic village did not include village construction cost of ?707m. Receipts for Stratford City development plots were scaled down from ?250m to ?70m. It's quite easy to see where Fazer confused his figures.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • OK, I have been extremely stupid. This is a long and sorry saga, so unless you are into schadenfreude,  or know about laptops and might actually be able to help, you probably need to stop reading here. I got a new laptop last May, with a 2 year guarantee from John Lewis (that was my first mistake, but the laptop met all my requirements at a very good price). I hate OneDrive, and I  had been using Carbonite for backing up files.  When I got the new laptop, the files from my old laptop which had been backed up on Carbonite were downloaded onto it. For tedious reasons originally related to problems with my old laptop, files and folders were duplicated all over the place. Sorting this out wasn't top of my priorities. In an attempt to at least keep new files,  and files edited since I bought the laptop, in one place and completely separate from all the old duplicated  files, I saved them all into folders  on the SSD. However, I didn't restart the Carbonite backup, because my intention was to sort out all the duplicate files first. About a fortnight ago, I bought an external hard drive. My intention was to copy everything on the new laptop onto it before I started deleting any of the duplicate files. I hadn't done that yet because I had to finish doing my accounts and then do my online tax return. So the copying was next on my To Do list. The inevitable happened. Out of the blue, my laptop went into complete meltdown. I was editing a spreadsheet and went into settings to turn the brightness up. I checked the brightness was ok on the spreadsheet, came out of settings, and suddenly everything went black. I did all the obvious things, then googled other possible fixes, including specific to my laptop model, but nothing worked. On starting the laptop, the Lenovo logo came up, the little white circle turned round, the red light for face recognition flashed, then zilch.  But clearly it wasn't a problem with the physical screen, as it displayed the logo. It wouldn't start in safe mode either. I thought I might either have accidentally changed some setting, or else it might be connected with a recent update  I couldn't try some of the tests suggested, eg removing RAM, because anything involving physically unscrewing my laptop would invalidate the guarantee  I am a member of Which Tech, so I contacted them. Obviously their hands were rather tied as they couldn't connect remotely to the laptop as there was no display. They said I couldn't have clicked on some other setting by mistake, as the display section only related to the display. They said they thought it was probably an issue with either the operating system or the mother board, or a component of them. They said it should be possible to identify the fault without losing my data. Given the involvement of John Lewis, I said I thought this was unlikely, as they had once told me to do an unnecessary factory reset on my old laptop and told me this wouldn't lose my data, which I had queried at the time,  and had to pay me compensation. So at this point I phoned John Lewis, to be told a repair would take "up to 28 working days" and no they wouldn't supply a replacement laptop during that time. I decided to take the laptop to John Lewis rather than have it collected, so their tech people could look at it first. So then the JL tech person said I must have clicked on  Bitlocker by mistake and locked myself out out of the laptop. I thought this was highly unlikely. Anyway, pursuing this line of thought did not help, and she was still unable to get into it by putting in the Bitlocker code. So then we had the data saving conversation. She said the company the laptop would go to was approved by Lenovo. She said they would do a factory reset first regardless. I said could they not try to identify the fault first. She said no. I said could I not request that they did. She said no. She said I could pay £150 for data retrieval, which could be done first. She said it would require removing the hard drive. She said if anybody else did this it would invalidate the guarantee. So. I have brought the laptop home to think things over. But I'm not willing to pay £150,  because the important files I can reconstruct by other means, and I have hard copies of most of them, it's just a time consuming pain. I have contacted Carbonite to see if they have any way of backing up the non backed up data even though I can't get into the laptop. If you have managed to reach the end of this post, congratulations 🤣 and do you have any bright ideas? I have typed all this on my mobile. It has taken a very very long time 🤣
    • I thought I saw some TW workmen there when it first happened last weekend but maybe it's too big for them to fix and they can't switch the mains off there without shutting all the businesses down.
    • You copy the address in the URL and then paste here  
    • Off the top of my head, there are notice boards in Sainsbury's and the library where small businesses can advertise, not to overlook the internet and forums such as this which these days is where very many go to first for small business information. I find it strange that you are mounting this crusade to allow small businesses the right to advertise in the Community noticeboards when there are so many alternatives these days. As I said before, the Community noticeboards are too small to accommodate commercial notices and would probably overwhelm and obscure the NFP notices. For info, during the week there is just as broad a mix passing by the NXR boards as the one by the station
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...