Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just read that facilities cost 6.7 billion pounds that's incredible!

My guess is there're a good few more millionaires now than there were before the Olympics or the millionaires involved are now multi millionaires ...


That's an insane ammount of money for a few roads and a stadium a copper box and a few temporary sites.


I'm in the wrong game!


Was the original budget 2.8 billion? And the total cost is now 9.7 billion? Incredible.


Just incredible.


When it comes to these projects all common sense and mathematical capacity appears to disappear just like the money.


Didn't arsenal build their 60,000 capacity football stadium for ?200 million? Edit it cost just under ?400,000.. I don't get that ?6.7 billion olympic figure ....

The parable


Bastiat's original parable of the broken window from Ce qu'on voit et ce qu'on ne voit pas (1850):


Have you ever witnessed the anger of the good shopkeeper, James Goodfellow, when his careless son happened to break a pane of glass? If you have been present at such a scene, you will most assuredly bear witness to the fact that every one of the spectators, were there even thirty of them, by common consent apparently, offered the unfortunate owner this invariable consolation?"It is an ill wind that blows nobody good. Everybody must live, and what would become of the glaziers if panes of glass were never broken?"


Now, this form of condolence contains an entire theory, which it will be well to show up in this simple case, seeing that it is precisely the same as that which, unhappily, regulates the greater part of our economical institutions.


Suppose it cost six francs to repair the damage, and you say that the accident brings six francs to the glazier's trade?that it encourages that trade to the amount of six francs?I grant it; I have not a word to say against it; you reason justly. The glazier comes, performs his task, receives his six francs, rubs his hands, and, in his heart, blesses the careless child. All this is that which is seen.


But if, on the other hand, you come to the conclusion, as is too often the case, that it is a good thing to break windows, that it causes money to circulate, and that the encouragement of industry in general will be the result of it, you will oblige me to call out, "Stop there! Your theory is confined to that which is seen; it takes no account of that which is not seen."


It is not seen that as our shopkeeper has spent six francs upon one thing, he cannot spend them upon another. It is not seen that if he had not had a window to replace, he would, perhaps, have replaced his old shoes, or added another book to his library. In short, he would have employed his six francs in some way, which this accident has prevented.[1][2]

yea right take the piss all you like ... You've been hoodwinked you're blinkered you're naive you can't add up .



What happens if these things don't get highlighted ?


They spent enought money to build 16 (sixteen) emirate 60,000 seater stadiums !!!!!


Maybe I've missed something?

But to me the numbers just don't add up.


If it looks wrong the it probably is wrong..


When one considers that we the tax payer are footing the bill the questions should be asked, as with any major works we appear to end up paying far more than anyone with any sense would pay.


Am I really being unreasonable to ask the question?


We're not talking about the cost of running the games or buying the land or cleaning the land..

6.7 billion (?6,700,000,000) six thousand seven hundred million pounds was the cost of building the buildings.


16 emirate stadiums. Thats Seating for 1 million people.


IE An insanely huge amount of money..


If that didn't make a lot of people very very rich I'd be very surprised.

Maybe it was the governments attempt to get the economy moving again?

The problem, if that was the aim is it would have concentrated the majority of money into the hands of a few already very rich building companies and those who owned them.


Am I the only person who thinks it's unacceptable for a company or individual to become rich from over charging the nation for an event like the Olympics?


No question many companies and individuals saw the Olympics as a money making gravy train.


Look at the numbers am I wrong.... I don't think so...


again that's

?6,700,000,000 maybe that number is so large it's too big for a lot of people to get just how big a number it is?

I tried to get an idea by comparing it to something else and I ended up with 16 emirate stadiums!

Which made NO sense.

fazer71 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> That's an insane ammount of money for a few roads

> and a stadium a copper box and a few temporary

> sites.

>

> I'm in the wrong game!


The figure also includes spending by several government departments investing as a result of the Olympic opportunities, transport infrastructure upgrades and counter-terrorism security.


I suspect people here are confusing the way Public Accounts Committee calculates the cost of the games to the cost of just building stadium and venues.

Fazer


Do you know Pipsky2008?


You could be twins


He had a thing about drains and construction costs


You two could cackle away for hours over any given "back of a fag packet" construction project


There's a manhole cover dedicated to Pipsky on LSL opposite Co-op, though since its inauguration he's gone very quite


Just wondering like !

If you're going to huff and puff about a many-billioned boondoggle, I would think the point of where those extra billions could have been better put to use (a little less austerity, for instance) might be more apposite than opining about 16 stadiums.


However, a curmudgeon I may be; a party-pooper I am not. So I shan't.

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> The figure also includes spending by several

> government departments investing as a result of

> the Olympic opportunities, transport

> infrastructure upgrades and counter-terrorism

> security.


"investing as a result of opportunities" is one way of putting it, but you're right.


It's remarkable how quickly people have forgotten the seven years of expensive weekend closures, rail-replacement buses and signalling failures that were needed to prepare for the games. Or that, if the games hadn't happened, we'd all have been exploded in our beds by terrorists, and there'd be no prospect of a 'trickle-down' from the train-drivers bonuses to reinvigorate the economy.


Even if those investments could be argued, the whingers can't deny that we've got a lot more for our ?6.7bn than we got for the ?2bn we lost on Metronet or the ?12bn we threw away on the NHS IT project. It's difficult to see how anyone can justifiably complain about the cost of a stadium and a pool and a bicycle track when they cost, all together, less than half the price of nothing.

Annette Curtain Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Don't tell me....

>

> You built your own Olympic venue (from UPVC) a

> while back, for a fraction of the cost

>

> And in half the time



now you didn't expect Everest to be doing that today

fazer71 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That's an insane ammount of money for a few roads

> and a stadium a copper box and a few temporary

> sites.

>


Err...a bit more than that I think - shops, restaurants, an education campus and nearly 3,000 flats in the Olympic Village, a good chunk of which will now become affordable housing.

fazer71 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Didn't arsenal build their 60,000 capacity

> football stadium for ?200 million? Edit it cost

> just under ?400,000.. I don't get that ?6.7

> billion olympic figure ....


Cost of Arsenal stadium, with a capacity of 60,000, was projected to cost ?200m but final cost was more than doubled at ?470m.


Olympic stadium - capacity 80,000 was projected to cost ?496m but final cost was ?428m, delivered on time and well below budget.


eta: m to replace bn

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • OK, I have been extremely stupid. This is a long and sorry saga, so unless you are into schadenfreude,  or know about laptops and might actually be able to help, you probably need to stop reading here. I got a new laptop last May, with a 2 year guarantee from John Lewis (that was my first mistake, but the laptop met all my requirements at a very good price). I hate OneDrive, and I  had been using Carbonite for backing up files.  When I got the new laptop, the files from my old laptop which had been backed up on Carbonite were downloaded onto it. For tedious reasons originally related to problems with my old laptop, files and folders were duplicated all over the place. Sorting this out wasn't top of my priorities. In an attempt to at least keep new files,  and files edited since I bought the laptop, in one place and completely separate from all the old duplicated  files, I saved them all into folders  on the SSD. However, I didn't restart the Carbonite backup, because my intention was to sort out all the duplicate files first. About a fortnight ago, I bought an external hard drive. My intention was to copy everything on the new laptop onto it before I started deleting any of the duplicate files. I hadn't done that yet because I had to finish doing my accounts and then do my online tax return. So the copying was next on my To Do list. The inevitable happened. Out of the blue, my laptop went into complete meltdown. I was editing a spreadsheet and went into settings to turn the brightness up. I checked the brightness was ok on the spreadsheet, came out of settings, and suddenly everything went black. I did all the obvious things, then googled other possible fixes, including specific to my laptop model, but nothing worked. On starting the laptop, the Lenovo logo came up, the little white circle turned round, the red light for face recognition flashed, then zilch.  But clearly it wasn't a problem with the physical screen, as it displayed the logo. It wouldn't start in safe mode either. I thought I might either have accidentally changed some setting, or else it might be connected with a recent update  I couldn't try some of the tests suggested, eg removing RAM, because anything involving physically unscrewing my laptop would invalidate the guarantee  I am a member of Which Tech, so I contacted them. Obviously their hands were rather tied as they couldn't connect remotely to the laptop as there was no display. They said I couldn't have clicked on some other setting by mistake, as the display section only related to the display. They said they thought it was probably an issue with either the operating system or the mother board, or a component of them. They said it should be possible to identify the fault without losing my data. Given the involvement of John Lewis, I said I thought this was unlikely, as they had once told me to do an unnecessary factory reset on my old laptop and told me this wouldn't lose my data, which I had queried at the time,  and had to pay me compensation. So at this point I phoned John Lewis, to be told a repair would take "up to 28 working days" and no they wouldn't supply a replacement laptop during that time. I decided to take the laptop to John Lewis rather than have it collected, so their tech people could look at it first. So then the JL tech person said I must have clicked on  Bitlocker by mistake and locked myself out out of the laptop. I thought this was highly unlikely. Anyway, pursuing this line of thought did not help, and she was still unable to get into it by putting in the Bitlocker code. So then we had the data saving conversation. She said the company the laptop would go to was approved by Lenovo. She said they would do a factory reset first regardless. I said could they not try to identify the fault first. She said no. I said could I not request that they did. She said no. She said I could pay £150 for data retrieval, which could be done first. She said it would require removing the hard drive. She said if anybody else did this it would invalidate the guarantee. So. I have brought the laptop home to think things over. But I'm not willing to pay £150,  because the important files I can reconstruct by other means, and I have hard copies of most of them, it's just a time consuming pain. I have contacted Carbonite to see if they have any way of backing up the non backed up data even though I can't get into the laptop. If you have managed to reach the end of this post, congratulations 🤣 and do you have any bright ideas? I have typed all this on my mobile. It has taken a very very long time 🤣
    • I thought I saw some TW workmen there when it first happened last weekend but maybe it's too big for them to fix and they can't switch the mains off there without shutting all the businesses down.
    • You copy the address in the URL and then paste here  
    • Off the top of my head, there are notice boards in Sainsbury's and the library where small businesses can advertise, not to overlook the internet and forums such as this which these days is where very many go to first for small business information. I find it strange that you are mounting this crusade to allow small businesses the right to advertise in the Community noticeboards when there are so many alternatives these days. As I said before, the Community noticeboards are too small to accommodate commercial notices and would probably overwhelm and obscure the NFP notices. For info, during the week there is just as broad a mix passing by the NXR boards as the one by the station
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...