Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sorry, another uniform thread...


I just looked at the uniform website which sells all kinds of things with logo but I'm not sure where to stop.


Which items of the DVIS uniform MUST have the logo on them? Jumper, polo?


There's not a word about socks/tights so I assume white or grey socks and grey tights/leggings are ok under skirts/dresses.


Do trousers have to be real trousers or are decent looking leggings also ok for girls in reception?


They don't mention dresses, can I just get red or chequered red/white uniform dresses at M&S?


Can they wear any colour coat and raincoat? And wellies? (shoes must be red/navy/brown but can they wear their regular yellow wellies with terrible girly print on them?)


Thanks for helping...

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/24941-dvis-uniform/
Share on other sites

That sounds ok to me KatDew, I'm just wondering whether to buy 1 or 2 items of each (jumper, polo) with logo and get the rest/spares plain to save some money or if all kids have logos on their tops.


Just thinking the dresses and skirts may have to be grey. If you click through to the "plain" range on the uniform website it shows grey.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/24941-dvis-uniform/#findComment-566268
Share on other sites

Hello!


I found this as it was the only place I could find an actual list (other than the guidance in the New Parents' Information booklet):


http://www.yourschooluniform.com/schools/Dulwich_Village_C_E_Infant_School_SE21_7AL/


I have a son about to start and have gone for only one logo-ed polo shirt and two logo-ed sweatshirts and everything else non-logo M&S/Tesco. I prefered the non-logo-ed tops as they were 100% cotton and cheaper. They only need to wear the logo-ed clothes when they go on outings so I hope that's ok. I've got 6 non-logo polo shirts (well, they were only ?2 for 2!) and 4 non-logo (thin...) sweatshirts.


I think you're assumptions are safe Sanne Panne on socks/tights. And I reckon any "sensible" coat should be fine if they don't specify. Re dresses - yes, I think any red/white gingham dress should be fine.


My son asks every day if he's going to go to school.... The concept of 4 weeks time is difficult to get across!!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/24941-dvis-uniform/#findComment-566479
Share on other sites

Sanne Panne


I have a daughter just going into Year 1 at DVIS - the uniform is basically anything red or grey, they don't actually have to wear anything with the logo on. Last year I bought her two logo-ed t-shirts, a polo shirt and a sweatshirt (more than enough really) and then supplemented with some Sainsbury's plain red polo shirts, Sainsburys red cardigans and some plain grey and red round necked tops. Tights and socks red, grey or white, everyone tends to wear the checked red and white dresses or my daughter had a red and white striped dress this summer which was fine. Any coat and any wellingtons fine - they are pretty relaxed really.

Hope that helps.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/24941-dvis-uniform/#findComment-566571
Share on other sites

I have a couple of red check dresses that are too small for my daughter now (they are Sainsburys age 5). PM me if you'd like them. As Laurac says, anything red, grey or white is fine. Shoes can be black, brown, navy or red. My daughter never wants to wear the logo sweathsirts and t-shirts I got as she prefers to be more girly!
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/24941-dvis-uniform/#findComment-567790
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Why on earth is there so much interest, and negativity, after a 100 days of a Labour government when we had 1000s of days of dreadful government before this with hardly a chat on this Website?  What is it that is suddenly so much greater interest? Here's part of a list of what they have done in a 100 days - it's from a Labour MP so obviously there is some bias, and mainly new Bills so yet to deliver/put into law.  This reminds me of the US election where the popular view was that Biden had achieved nothing, rather than leading the recovery after Covid, a fairer tax system, housing, supporting workers, dealing with community unrest following high profile racist incidents,  So if we think Starmer is ineffective and Labour incompetent then we are all going to believe it? I do feel sick after seeing Clarkson on Newsnight, playing to the gallery.  Surely Trump must have a high profile role for him on the environment and climate change  
    • Hi looking for a shed for my allotment. Can pick up
    • But do you not understand how tough farming is, especially post-Brexit when some of the subsidies were lost and costs have increased massively yet the prices farmers can charge has not? On the BBC News tonight they said pig farming costs had gone up 54% since 2019, cow farming costs up 44% and cereal costs up 43%. The NFU said that the margins are on average 0.5% return on capital. Land and buildings are assets that don't make money until you sell them...it's what you do with them that makes money and farms are struggling to make money and so many farms are generational family businesses so never realise the assets (one farmers on the news said his farm had been in the family since 1822) but will have to to pay tax for continuing the family business. On another news item tonight there was a short piece saying the government has said that 50,000 more pensioners will be forced into relative poverty (60% of the average income) due to the Winter Fuel Allowance removal which will rise to 100,000 more by 2027. James Murray from the Treasury was rolled out on Newsnight to try and defend that and couldn't. You can't give doctors 20%+ and push more pensioners into poverty as a result.  The problem for Labour is the court of public opinion will judge them and right now the jury is out after a series of own-goals, really poor communication and ill-thought-out idealogical policies. And don't ever annoy the farmers.....;-)  
    • That % of “affected” doesn’t mean they are all in deep trouble.  It means this will touch on them in some small way mostly - apart from the biggest farms  it’s like high rate tax earners taking to the street when Osborne dragged child/benefit claimants into self assessment.  A mild pain  the more I read, the more obviously confected it is. Still - just as with farage and his banking “woes”, a social media campaign is no barrier to the gullible  what percentage of farms affected by Brexit and to what degree compared go IHT?  Or does that not matter? Thats different money is it? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...