Jump to content

Recommended Posts

pk Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichFox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Twitter Cecilia Bartholomew

> >

> > From now on you leave your homes at your own

> > peril-

> > If you do not have govt permission to be

> outdoors

> > you must stay in your houses.

> >

> > The govt may arrest and detain you if you

> disobey

> > these new laws! #coronavirus

> #coronavirusoutbreak

> >

> > Is this for real.. ??

>

> I?ve asked before without an answer, but I?ll ask

> again:

>

> Why don?t you use the internet to establish facts

> rather than peddle BS?


I am not saying for one minute I agree with what this person is saying.


I have Never heard of Cecilia Bartholomew. I still haven't bothered to find out who she is.


That's why I added "Is this for Real"


I'm off to the EDT.... after Corrie and Deadenders.. see yer there .

Probably my stupidity, but I have not been able to find any predictions as to how long this situation is likely to last. If anything reliable is available, of course.


We had already cancelled/postponed our next two upcoming gigs, and will cancel the May ones, but I'm wondering for how long to "wait and see" for June or just to cancel/postpone them now.


The Autumn ones can wait until we see how the situation is over the summer.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-----------------------------------------------------

>

> I'm off to the EDT.... after Corrie and

> Deadenders.. see yer there .



Good to see you pay such close attention to government advice about avoiding pubs then, especially as you are in a high risk group.


Or are you joking?

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

>

> I am not saying for one minute I agree with what

> this person is saying.

>

> I have Never heard of Cecilia Bartholomew. I still

> haven't bothered to find out who she is.

>

> That's why I added "Is this for Real"

>

> I'm off to the EDT.... after Corrie and

> Deadenders.. see yer there .


I?m genuinely interested as to how you come across this sort of stuff but not information from any credible source?


I won?t be going to the pub, thanks, i understand it?s been advised against for the benefit of others

gromit3:16 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> this non stop media coverage is too much, people

> are going to be having panic and heart attacks

> because of it.

>

> I've had to switch off lbc as it is non stop

> coverage of what is or is not going to happen.

> it's getting too much now.


Agree with this. It's obviously a serious issue, which needs due attention, but it's non-stop

(And almost exclusively covid-19 news) from most media outlets.


With all the 'social distancing' going on, people are seeing other people increasing less, living in a bit of a bubble and working themselves into a lather with the news being their major window to the outside world....

gromit3:16 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> this non stop media coverage is too much, people

> are going to be having panic and heart attacks

> because of it.

>

> I've had to switch off lbc as it is non stop

> coverage of what is or is not going to happen.

> it's getting too much now.


Netflix has no coverage :)

The Commons Health and Social Care Select Committee has a session of inquiry into "Preparations for Coronavirus" this afternoon that may be of interest. Starts at 13:45 according to https://committees.parliament.uk/, though the https://parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/cced67ec-c445-4698-a21b-7d9ff8a01354 channel, at which it can be caught live or in recording, says 14:00, which I think is more likely. A written transcript usually turns up shortly thereafter. I suspect I'll find it a lot more interesting and less stressing than this, fairly typical, forum thread.


I'm continuing to update, at the top of page 6, the daily counts of confirmed cases in Southwark, as issued at https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-51768274. It's now at 33. I wonder if some of the variability in the apparent rate of increase (latest counts: 11, 13, 28, 33) could be due as much to the way cases reach official awareness as to the real-world incidence, which is likely to be higher, perhaps much higher. I trust that there are various stratagems in operation, such as GP surgery reports or random population sampling, to get ongoing true estimates of the numbers actually infected.


Can anyone recommend any other public fora, newsgroups, mailing lists, blogs,etc where there's any fairly expert discussion of the issues and science? I'm feeling nostalgia for the days of Usenet, etc.


Despite being over 70, the idea of getting infected early and over with, and becoming a free and potentially useful agent again, is a tempting one.

I was involved in both planning for Sars and Avian Flu. The measures go well beyond what we considered likely at those respective times - but (a) what is going on in the continent will influence our response (b) the world has moved on since my time with the ease of home working © this is a different beast in terms of transmission and health impacts.


It is reassuring that we are still taking an evidence with the experts full involvement, that this is a collective decision, and that somehow they've got Bojo to show gravitas and speak plainly/succinctly. This was a strength in most PMs in history.


Select Committee's are always interesting and history will judge.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichFox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> ---

> >

> > I'm off to the EDT.... after Corrie and

> > Deadenders.. see yer there .

>

>

> Good to see you pay such close attention to

> government advice about avoiding pubs then,

> especially as you are in a high risk group.

>

> Or are you joking?


If the Government were that concerned about people going to the Pub they would make pubs close.

But they make Millions from Duty and VAT on alcohol sales


Like if they were concerned about Tobacco they would ban it.

But they make Millions from Duty and VAT on Tobacco sales


and if they were concerned about pollution from cars in central London they would ban cars from the area.

But they make Millions from Duty and VAT on petrol sales and the Congestion Charge and The ULEZ charges..


I did go to the EDT to find out the current situation.

The EDT was quieter than usual but has NO intention at this time to be closing its doors.


Most of the Restaurants seemed empty. 21.00


Foxy.

No Foxy, if they forced pubs to close they would be making insurance claims possible. This advisory method introduces the idea of further restrictions to the public and crucially props up the economy (for the time being) whilst helpfully protecting the govt from business seeking financial recompense.

DF, the problem for the government is in not sending small business to the wall. In other words, this government still hasn't yet got a full pandemic head on. It is hoping that people will follow advice and reduce the need for more draconian measures. That approach clearly did not work in France however, so some might say it is only a matter of time.


The other thing is that government is also stretched to think of every impact of every decision and find solutions - things are moving so fast. The very idea we can be thinking of trade negotiations with the EU at this time for example, is bonkers. And thank goodness we are still in transition and part of the single market, and able to access all the food and other imports we are going to need over the coming months.


So stop referencing idiotic social media mouthpieces and start understanding the facts. This pandemic (and it IS a pandemic) has the potential to push the world into war levels of debt. The best chance we have of getting through it and getting back to normal, is to slow the spread and buy time, for either a vaccine or combination drug treatments that work to emerge. Understand why, understand that COVID19 is 30 times more lethal than seasonal flu, understand what an 18 percent hospitalisation rate means for the NHS and do your part to help make sure we don't get anywhere near to that worst case scenario.

DF the government don't make millions, the government raise money to pay for things that we need in our society. Like the NHS. But on the cynical side if they truly cared about the environment then they would raise fuel duty. Shocking. OK not a covid-19 specific comment.

ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> Despite being over 70, the idea of getting

> infected early and over with, and becoming a free

> and potentially useful agent again, is a tempting

> one.



The trouble is ianr, you could be infected early, then over and out rather than over with and carry on.


And in any case, "they" don't have enough info at the moment to know whether you would be permanently immune once you have been infected, or whether the immunity might wear off.


Plus the present form of the virus might mutate. And probably will at some point.


Don't know whether to laugh or cry really :)

Dr Phil Hammond's 'MD' article in the 6-19 March edition of Private Eye is still online at https://www.private-eye.co.uk/columnists (but liable to be replaced by tomorrow) and I think worth a look. I was reminded of it by one of Malumbu's post earlier.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ianr Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> >

> > Despite being over 70, the idea of getting

> > infected early and over with, and becoming a

> free

> > and potentially useful agent again, is a

> tempting

> > one.

>

>

> The trouble is ianr, you could be infected early,

> then over and out rather than over with and carry

> on.

>

> And in any case, "they" don't have enough info at

> the moment to know whether you would be

> permanently immune once you have been infected, or

> whether the immunity might wear off.

>

> Plus the present form of the virus might mutate.

> And probably will at some point.

>

> Don't know whether to laugh or cry really :)


we don't even know if there is sometimes a delay between the initial and severe phases. Reports in China of patients recovering then falling ill again with worse symptoms.



https://www.scmp.com/news/china/society/article/3065091/coronavirus-recovered-patient-dies-china-reports-139-new-cases

nxjen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Or watch these penguins looking around an aquarium

> in Chicago empty because of closure due to

> Covid-19

> https://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2020/mar/1

> 7/flipping-brilliant-penguins-tour-chicago-aquariu

> m-closed-due-to-covid-19-video?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Otw

> her



:)

I've been trying to find data to support Patrick Vallance's claim that the UK is in ?the top three or four countries in terms of testing" .


I can only find this table from 9 March on Worldometers https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/covid-19-testing/


which ,even with my shocking absence of numeracy,suggests to me that the UK is not up there in terms of testing .


Does anyone else have more detail or views ?

Some countries have different problems :)


"Authorities are also working to stem the sudden flow of thousands of people to Argentina?s Atlantic beach resorts. The announcement of paid work leave for persons over 60 and permission for others to work from home has apparently been taken by many as an extension of the southern hemisphere summer holidays."

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • As a result of the Horizon scandal it now seems very clear that the Post Office management are highly disingenuous and not be trusted!  There needs to be a campaign launched to challenge the threatened closure, unless the Post Office can demonstrate beyond doubt that the branch is loss making - and even then it could argued that better management could address this. I hope the local media take this up and our MP  and a few demonstrations outside wouldn’t do any harm. Bad publicity can be very effective!         
    • Unlikely. It would take a little more than a bit of Milton to alter the pH of eighty-odd thousand gallons of water.
    • It actually feels as though what I said is being analytically analysed word by word, almost letter by better. I really don't believe that I should have to explain myself to the level it seems someone wants me to. Clearly someones been watching way too much Big Brother. 
    • Sadly they don't do the full range of post office services
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...