Jump to content

Recommended Posts

lindylou Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This man threw a cup of hot coffee in a ladies

> face today in Peckham rye park and knocked an

> elderly man to the ground.


Why didn't a couple of bystanders perform a "citizens arrest"? Similar to when that guy pushed an old boy onto the tube tracks.


Yes he's undoubtedly extremely unwell, but I'm afraid my sympathy stops quite a long way short of "poor guy". He is dangerous and shouldn't be out among the public.


I'm far from confident/competent in physical confrontation, but I'm not sure if I could forgive myself if I just stood by while women and the elderly were being assaulted.

Worryingly a thread popped up on my Neighbourhood account about a woman being sexually assaulted on East Dulwich Grove at 2.30pm yesterday. The only description being this guy had two obvious scars on his face. I just wondered if they could they be linked to this guy?
If anyone does have cause to call 999, I think I'd make a point of mentioning, not just the immediate act that triggered the call, but also, if appropriate, the fact that the person matches the description of the perpetrator of number of other instances of spontaneous 'random' threatening behaviour or assault in the area over the past week.
I dialled 999 on Sunday morning when he pushed my friend in PR park and I witnessed him attacking others. I couldn?t stay but was told police were there looking for him. I don?t know the outcome (hence creating this thread) so I very much hope they?re aware there is serious concern.
All the descriptions here suggest the man is displaying clear signs of psychotic behaviour - the police are neither trained nor resourced to act as psychiatrists - all they can do is to lock him up, and we know that this is frequently a precursor to self-harm, or worse, injury caused by police attempts to restrain someone not criminal but mad. Ideally he should probably be sectioned and hospitalised, but there are woeful shortages of acute beds. The waiting list for tertiary (hospital) psychiatric care is many months if not longer. It may be that he has medication but is refusing to take it - and people cannot be obliged or compelled to take medicine unless sectioned. This is a problem which is not simply soluble by dialling '999'. Anything the police can do will only be very short term. And probably pretty useless (other than protecting individuals currently at risk).

Throwing hot coffee in a woman?s face and throwing an elderly man to the floor is a criminal offence and Police should intervene.


Agree with blah blah, Police will be able to get him support if required. Talk on here about mental health issues is just speculation. Unfortunately he seems to be targeting more vulnerable people in our community and I hope he gets picked up soon.



Penguin68 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> All the descriptions here suggest the man is

> displaying clear signs of psychotic behaviour -

> the police are neither trained nor resourced to

> act as psychiatrists - all they can do is to lock

> him up, and we know that this is frequently a

> precursor to self-harm, or worse, injury caused by

> police attempts to restrain someone not criminal

> but mad. Ideally he should probably be sectioned

> and hospitalised, but there are woeful shortages

> of acute beds. The waiting list for tertiary

> (hospital) psychiatric care is many months if not

> longer. It may be that he has medication but is

> refusing to take it - and people cannot be obliged

> or compelled to take medicine unless sectioned.

> This is a problem which is not simply soluble by

> dialling '999'. Anything the police can do will

> only be very short term. And probably pretty

> useless (other than protecting individuals

> currently at risk).

If he is displaying psychotic behaviour, a Police psychiatrist will section him. Then medical professionals will assess the risk, esp if he is not taking his medication, and go from there.


You are making assumptions that doctors (you need two) are available to section him, and that there is space in a medium secure unit for him to be housed (his behaviour is clearly aggressive and simply putting him on a general psychiatric ward may well not be suitable). Frequently the only space - at least short term - where someone displaying psychotic behaviour to be held is a police cell, and the police are neither trained, nor are police cells suitable, for this. What you are describing is an ideal - I do know that waiting times for patients with mental problems which require psychiatric intervention are bad and getting worse.

So what are you suggesting? People should not bother calling the Police in case it's due to mental health issues?



Penguin68 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If he is displaying psychotic behaviour, a Police

> psychiatrist will section him. Then medical

> professionals will assess the risk, esp if he is

> not taking his medication, and go from there.

>

> You are making assumptions that doctors (you need

> two) are available to section him, and that there

> is space in a medium secure unit for him to be

> housed (his behaviour is clearly aggressive and

> simply putting him on a general psychiatric ward

> may well not be suitable). Frequently the only

> space - at least short term - where someone

> displaying psychotic behaviour to be held is a

> police cell, and the police are neither trained,

> nor are police cells suitable, for this. What you

> are describing is an ideal - I do know that

> waiting times for patients with mental problems

> which require psychiatric intervention are bad and

> getting worse.

I spoke to 2 police officers on Wednesday who were telling me 6 officers had spend 3 hours restraining a 21 yr old male mental health patient at KCH, they had arrested him 3 days prior where he was put into the Maudsley and released. Police are stretched beyond need, mental health services are stretched beyond need and these situations are only going to become more frequent.
If he commits assault (as he already has) and is arrested and charged, a court could detain him under the mental health act and send him to a secure unit. The Maudsley is a hospital, not a secure unit. SO I suspect if the aggressive behaviour continues, that is where he will end up.

So what are you suggesting? People should not bother calling the Police in case it's due to mental health issues?


No, of course not, but what I am saying is that 'calling the police' does not simply solve the problem, except in terms of short term safety for the public. 'Calling the police' where a mentally ill patient is concerned, as it appears may be the case here, is the start of a long and difficult process - and one the police are ill equipped and resourced to deliver. '999' in and of itself is not a solution (as it may be for the simply criminal). Police are about dealing with crime, not mental health issues save where immediate safety (of the public or the mentally ill person) is concerned.

Penguin, the only way to get someone who is a danger to the public off the street is through the Police and courts into a secure mental health unit. So calling the Police is absolutely the right thing to do. And just to add that sectioning and detention are different things. Staff at any hospital will also call Police if a patient is threatening them. Only secure units are designed to treat people detained via the MHA.

I have seen this guy three times in the last week-10 days between the Tesco on East Dulwich Road and Greendale/East Dulwich Grove.


I recognised him as someone suffering from mental health/drug issues immediately having had experience around people who suffer from this. I knew it was the same guy as he had the same jacket each time and the same walk. The first two times I was walking and he locked eyes with me and may have mumbled something but i'm quite a big guy and keep myself to myself so he never approached me. The third time I was driving and he was swinging his arms and kept looking behind himself as he approached Lordship Lane.


We have small children and have to walk down Greendale and my partner has to walk home down there when it is now dark as early as 5pm so I hope that the situation is being properly monitored. Is there we can do to anything we can do to help/inform the local Police? He is clearly doing the same route (Greendale - Peckham Rye Park up EDG/EDR)if that helps them.

Penguin, the only way to get someone who is a danger to the public off the street is through the Police and courts into a secure mental health unit.


This is simply not true. Within my own extended family one individual was sectioned at the behest and instigation of his parents - the police were not directly involved, and certainly not the courts. A patient presenting to a doctor and not prepared to accept treatment may, again, be sectioned if the doctor (with a colleague) believes that is in his or her best interests. Of course, when an individual is acting in a threatening manner, or attacking people, the police can be called and will act to their best capabilities, but they are not properly trained or resourced to be an NHS outreach service.


'Sectioning' an individual is something that happens instead of a court being involved.

Both are correct. A person can be sectioned under the MHA with or without police involvement.


If a person is in public and/ or behaving in a manner that suggests mental health difficulties and risks the police will be involved in order to securely take the person to a designated 136 assessment suite where they can be assessed by mental health professionals.


I hope he has now been found

This man clearly has mental health issues but he needs to be arrested and taken off the streets before he severely injures someone. It is a police issue primarily because he's walking around committing crimes - attacking people and kids, throwing coffee in people's faces and it looks potentially like the same person who sexually assaulted a young woman at 2.30pm on East Dulwich Grove. I have an 11-year-old who goes to school around this area and I'm worried as he wouldn't necessarily know how to react if approached by this man and I've had to warn him about this. Does anyone know if he has been caught?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Ask him politely if you can help him.  I remember staring at my old flat.  Can I help you a neighbour asked.  Yes I said, I had seen that they have split it into two flats. And we had a chat about it.   Edited to add - if they are doing this in plain site then it sounds harmless, but it would be good manners to knock on your door.  In our area there is someone well known on X that walks up and down taking pictures of anything out of the ordinary, often quite trivial, supposedly for laughs.  I could speculate who the owner could be, a creative or a gangster, but that would not be appropriate!
    • Hi. I’m looking for an Ikea ekanaset armchair in light grey fabric (now discontinued) to match one I already have. Just asking on the off chance someone is about to get rid of one!  Would need to be in good condition. Thanks. 
    • Hi folks, I'm hoping it's nothing, but we've noticed a man drive up outside our house in a white Jaguar XE 2.0 (example pic below), get out, take some photos of the building work with his phone, and then drive off. We've seen him do this a couple of times over the last couple of months.  Reg BP16 UAJ. Is it anything to be concerned about? I'm hoping it's just an architect or someone interested in the design and building work...
    • So glad you found this poor little thing....  I heard that so many people tried to catch it as it was running in the road.  Well done!            
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...