Jump to content

Recommended Posts

There is currently a major outbreak of whooping cough (pertussis). A very good reason to make sure that babies especially have had their jabs. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-19013016


"In the UK, the whooping cough vaccine is given to babies after two, three and four months. A booster dose is given just before primary school.


Babies are not fully protected until the third jab. It is in the following years that protection is at its peak then it gradually fades. It means you can get whooping cough as an adult even if you had the infection or the jabs as a child.


Prof Adam Finn, from University of Bristol, said: "The current vaccination programme has reduced whooping cough in children, but also pushed it back into older age groups. Immunity due to vaccine does not last as long as immunity due to infection so as the number of people who have had whooping cough in the past falls, population immunity falls and rates go up."


In other words, it's always going to be in the community, so make sure babies are protected by ensuring they have their DTP vaccines and boosters.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/24774-whooping-cough-outbreak/
Share on other sites

It's actually been around for many years, its just a case of whether or not it is recognised by the medical profession. It has been assumed it was wiped out, but according to Dr. Jenkinson, this is not so, and he has been researching and treating it for many years.


http://www.whoopingcough.net/keyworth%20study.htm



Not wanting to add to the hysteria, but I fear I may have.


My son had it last year. Had a relentless cough for months and difficulty breathing during coughing fits. There is a recordng on the site to help people to identify the cough.

Well according to Dr Jenkinson, he has treated more cases of whooping cough in his small village than the whole of the UK. Suggesting that if all GP's had recognised and treated it over the past 30 years, there might not be evidence of a dramatic 'increase in the number of cases' but a steady number which fluctuates every 4-5 years when the vaccination expires.

Whooping cough has certainly not been wiped out, not in this country or anywhere - if it had been, there wouldn't be any need to vaccinate against it. My original post was triggered by the fact that I'm actually recovering from a bout of whooping cough myself. I heard that it's sometimes referred as the 100 days cough and sure enough I'm still coughing and hacking and phlegmy (yuk!) weeks later.


Luckily for me, it's not a killer cough as I'm too old... But a very good reason to ensure that the little ones have had their protective jabs. So glad that my daughter hasn't caught it off me.


PS DDul, thanks for the correction! it is indeed DTaP in this country

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...