Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Received a very effective looking spoof eBay spam this morning which asked if I had an item still for sale. Clicking the link woudl have taken me to a fake eBay logoin page...and you can guess the rest. As an eBay, and spam aware user, I didn;t click the link, but fired up another browser, went to e-bay and searched for the item ID (As it's a while since I have sold anything and was suspicios. Anyhow, as it turns out I'm not selling dolls to saddos in America I forward the smap to eBay's report-a-spoof mail address.


(Finally getting to the point)..it seems to me that there enough web savvy people out there to maybe start and hit back at the spoofers. Assume they sent out 10,000 copies of that mail, and I'm aware it's likely to be a helluva lot more..., then if you;re web savvy enough, why not click the link, fill in the webpage, but with totally duff info? To my mind the result would be a spammers database of collected info full of crap data. Hopefully the resulting volumes of crap data would make trying to find out the correct data a waste fo time?


Down side I can see is that maybe it'll notify the mail address is valid, but I thought that if you POP your mail then that's done anyway?


Thoughts?


E

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2477-some-thoughts-on-spam/
Share on other sites

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> what do you reckon to the 1p charge per email as a

> deterrent? I know it goes against some principles

> but still..


In a way I can see the benefits of that, but that does sort of cripple those who send out legitimate mailing lists that people have signed up to. But then I guess a mailshot woud lbe seen as a cost also.


> I daren't log in to my inbox anymore - and that's

> even if I use a clean new address and never enter

> it into any web form

Don't know if you know but spammers use mail address auto generation code. so a list of names is combined with a list of known web url's ISP's and they are combined so [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] and so on....


Annasfield......EH!?!?!?

There'll always be some way to spam.


I keep getting new fans on digg, if you click on their profile there own dugg 'stories' are of course the usual viagra, cia-lis, extension pumps sales patters. I know have marked digg notification emails as junk.


If you charge for emails then spammers will just get cleverer at attacking sites like our very own forum.

> Don't know if you know but spammers use mail address auto generation code. so a list of names is combined with a list of known web url's ISP's and they are combined so [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] and so on....



And auto-generation in the corporate sector as email addresses tend to be standardised:


[email protected] etc

When I worked for a church, I regularly received appeals from 'Christians' whose spouse/father/etc had died, left oodles of money specifically for church work if only I give my bank details. These used to drive me mad until I saved them all in a folder, and each time I received one, I copied back the old ones. Much more satisfying, in fact, I used to look forward to them.

I occasionally get the same sorts of emails. I use 5 different email addresses one of which I use for ebay. I am very careful with this one ans never get any spam other than fake ebay or paypal emails. This address (and my others) are not usual names or words and are 'made up'. The only way anyone can get my ebay email address is from another ebay user who has harvested email address from people they have sold items to or bought from.


I get spam in my ither email inboxes because at some point they have been published on websites (though now removed).


I use one particular email to do all my online shopping (other than ebay)


I have seen a number of articles where people have gone after the spammers in order to do much the same thing as you describe though I am not sure how well it would work.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Has anyone else had a water meter fitted in the last couple of years but is not being billed on the actual consumption as measured by the meter. I ask because after our meter was fitted 18 months ago, we could see the actual meter readings on our online account. This was helpful in terms of monitoring the consumption down to a day to day basis. However after about 6 months, the meter readings were no longer published online. I recall earlier advice from TW that  we would have a 12 month "trial" period after which we could opt to switch to metered consumption or stay on the rate based on the rateable value of our house.  As there's only two of us in the house, I reckon our actual consumption is well below the RV based consumption rate so with a bit of cynicism I reckon TW has deliberately discontinued publishing the meter reading.  Had the readings continued to be published, then we could have made an informed decision on whether or not to move to metered billing. Is anyone else in a similar position?
    • DR Yes he had not been very well for about the last 2 or 3 years but was making some progress, we use to see him down LL getting his shopping and stop and catch up on all matters Ed. I Pm'd just before Christmas and received no reply which was not like him so I did have concerns about his health but I had no other means of contacting him. R.i.P Foxy Bob S 
    • So, private polling for Labour in London puts Labour and the Lib Dems with the same number of seats on Southwark Council come May. It’s not clear from this Guardian article (link below) if that will be all due to Labour losses or if the Lib Dems will actually make some gains in Southwark. Either way, the Greens are set for a massive surge in seats across London, if the polling is correct. Labour urged to listen to progressive voters or face ‘political earthquake’ in London | Labour | The Guardian
    • I shouted at someone who pushed by me on the tube last week, as they got off I said your could least say "excuse me". Somebody told me "they did".  Whoops, humble pie. I have no idea whether the original poster overreacted. I have done far too many times, and try (or should try harder) to learn from this, and do regret not handling things better/calmer.  I expect most of have similar 'guilty' secrets. There's a separate thread on why, being British, we apologise when it is not our fault, or when we simply want to get past someone.  Excuse me (and/or thank you when they move out of your way) is appropriate.  Even people who you wouldn't fancy meeting on a dark alley do this.  And I apologise for being so judgmental, I couldn't find the right words.   (if you remember this ad you may be considered by some to be old)  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...