Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Not really monitored in sufficient detail - anecdotally though I'd imagine 'awful' and everyone who has a wood burner and another source of heating should stop burning wood now.


Latest research shows that the toxic spike within your own home each time you open the door is huge - so perhaps people might start to think now its clear they're poisoning their own family as well as their neighbours.




ab29 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Interesting; although must admit I trust The

> Guardian less after their biased and one sided

> reporting on LTNs

>

>

> first mate Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> >

> https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/may/0

>

> >

> 7/fireplaces-and-stoves-are-bigger-polluters-than-

>

> > traffic

> >

> > Saw this. Wonder what stats are like in

> Southwark?

first mate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mr chicken needs his wings clipped😉



Well it wouldn't matter if I could drive everywhere freely in the largest SUV I could finance. As it is I have to flap from Gail's to the park and I do find that obnoxious. Speaking of which I'm thinking of lobbying the council to remove the zigzags by that zebra crossing and the double yellow lines round all the junctions in the village so there's more parking spaces (for local residents only though). Can anyone help me get this added to the One Dulwich manifesto?

I'm surprised at how few people have supported the comments which are objecting to the removal of the buses from Rye Lane.

(Objections are the red pins)

https://peckhamstreetspace.commonplace.is/

Plenty of cyclists are saying how great it is now and that the closure should be made permanent (supporters = green pins)

As with all these things most that are affected don?t have time to search out all the websites they should be sticking pins into.


The council seem to be happy with that and only wish to hear from one demographic whatever they may say about inclusion etc....

The buses ought to be brought back to the Lane. The drivers are on the whole more likely to be cycle-friendly due to training and the presence of a public asset is needed to democratise the street. Rye Lane is part treasure, part midden. Pedestrians and cycles are to be encouraged but not at the expense of those who choose a different way of getting around. I don?t like the feeling of Rye Lane especially near the south end: it?s often empty and just feels lacking life there. The litter and ubiquitous graffiti doesn?t help, but councillors and officers just don?t get involved in the same way they do a mile or so south (cf. LTNs at Melbourne Grove, etc.).

Keira - thanks for that .I've just commented .It's a bit of a faff ,I thought that as I've already commented on other commonspace maps that I could go ahead ,stick my pin ,write my comments and that was it .


But no - you have to complete more questions and verify by responding to an incoming email .



I found it convoluted and off putting .

On a similar note, the Council seem to have unilaterally disabled the "update" service on their Council and Democracy website. I've suddenly stopped receiving updates, and when I try to resubscribe I get an error message with the ominous word "Forbidden". Ironic.



dulwichfolk Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> As with all these things most that are affected

> don?t have time to search out all the websites

> they should be sticking pins into.

>

> The council seem to be happy with that and only

> wish to hear from one demographic whatever they

> may say about inclusion etc....

kiera Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm surprised at how few people have supported the

> comments which are objecting to the removal of the

> buses from Rye Lane.

> (Objections are the red pins)

> https://peckhamstreetspace.commonplace.is/

> Plenty of cyclists are saying how great it is now

> and that the closure should be made permanent

> (supporters = green pins)



Unfortunately unless you are in the "KNOW" you will never get to hear of these consultations which Southwark like as it means their selected groups who support whatever Southwark want to push through will vote.


I have asked the Local Cllr Jasmine Ali and Deputy Leader what is happening and have never received an answer. If this consultation exist you would have thought she would have provided information.


But then perhaps from her window in Tooley Street she cannot see what is happening but she does live off Rye Lane so you would have thought she would have more interest. Still Southwarks has an already decided plan.

Well, well, well and are we surprised. You'll have to find a clever workaround. I think the council do a lot of 'managing' of information by these accidentally on purpose technology 'errors'.


legalalien Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> On a similar note, the Council seem to have

> unilaterally disabled the "update" service on

> their Council and Democracy website. I've

> suddenly stopped receiving updates, and when I try

> to resubscribe I get an error message with the

> ominous word "Forbidden". Ironic.

>

>

> dulwichfolk Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > As with all these things most that are affected

> > don?t have time to search out all the websites

> > they should be sticking pins into.

> >

> > The council seem to be happy with that and only

> > wish to hear from one demographic whatever they

> > may say about inclusion etc....

Good video here showing how nice it is in the morning in Dulwich Village when all the traffic has ben diverted onto Croxted Rd, EDG, Lordship Lane etc. Really nice that the residents of Calton can enjopy their morning cappuccino in peace now.




An earlier video shows how awful it is on Croxted road now...

I?ve emailed the constitutional team email address, let?s see. I am bloody minded enough to check frequently to see what is going on. You?ll see from my other thread that there?s a Peckham / Nunhead ward meeting to discuss low traffic in Nunhead, next week (online) which was advertised on the Peckham and Nunhead Facebook page but doesn?t seem to have made it into the main Southwark calendar.

Not sure what the point of these videos are - they show precisely how much traffic/pollution is caused by privately owned cars with single/low occupancy? How large/over-powered, and inefficient most of them are for the job? How end-to-end on-street parking add further to the congestion? That many of these queuing vehicles and biggest polluters will be dropped by October with the ULEZ extension comes in? That the school run is one of the biggest causes of congestion at this time of day?... etc etc etc.


I'd say it's an advert to ask people IF they absolutely need to drive, and if so, is this the best time TO do it?



slarti b Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Good video here showing how nice it is in the

> morning in Dulwich Village when all the traffic

> has ben diverted onto Croxted Rd, EDG, Lordship

> Lane etc. Really nice that the residents of

> Calton can enjopy their morning cappuccino in

> peace now.

>

>


> nnel=OnionBike

>

> An earlier video shows how awful it is on Croxted

> road now...

>


> nnel=OnionBike

I always ask the same question about the photos and videos of people sitting in the road/parklet having a drink at the square of shame unless it is to wind up the displacement areas more then they already are.



Raeburn Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not sure what the point of these videos are - they

> show precisely how much traffic/pollution is

> caused by privately owned cars with single/low

> occupancy? How large/over-powered, and inefficient

> most of them are for the job? How end-to-end

> on-street parking add further to the congestion?

> That many of these queuing vehicles and biggest

> polluters will be dropped by October with the ULEZ

> extension comes in? That the school run is one of

> the biggest causes of congestion at this time of

> day?... etc etc etc.

>

> I'd say it's an advert to ask people IF they

> absolutely need to drive, and if so, is this the

> best time TO do it?

>

>

> slarti b Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Good video here showing how nice it is in the

> > morning in Dulwich Village when all the traffic

> > has ben diverted onto Croxted Rd, EDG, Lordship

> > Lane etc. Really nice that the residents of

> > Calton can enjopy their morning cappuccino in

> > peace now.

> >

> >

>


>

> > nnel=OnionBike

> >

> > An earlier video shows how awful it is on

> Croxted

> > road now...

> >

>


>

> > nnel=OnionBike

....Which show how pleasant streets can be if we reduce reliance on large vehicles making unnecessary trips on residential roads, and further jamming them up with parking.


Unfortunately, all the roads in the videos - Croxted, E Dulwich Grove, Norwood Rd - are all A-road designated, which means major through routes ie. assigned to move vehicles across key points. I think this is often overlooked when two roads are compared. The most effective method of reducing traffic and pollution on these A-roads is simple; stop using single-occupancy cars for unnecessary journeys at the busiest times of the day.



dulwichfolk Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I always ask the same question about the photos

> and videos of people sitting in the road/parklet

> having a drink at the square of shame unless it is

> to wind up the displacement areas more then they

> already are.

>

I never appreciated that the journeys were being monitored and the occupancy along with vehicle size and parking allocation was being measured.


If the plan is to route everything (including all the deliveries/side road traffic onto the ?major A roads? as you put it why don?t the council just say that.




Raeburn Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ....Which show how pleasant streets can be if we

> reduce reliance on large vehicles making

> unnecessary trips on residential roads, and

> further jamming them up with parking.

>

> Unfortunately, all the roads in the videos -

> Croxted, E Dulwich Grove, Norwood Rd - are all

> A-road designated, which means major through

> routes ie. assigned to move vehicles across key

> points. I think this is often overlooked when two

> roads are compared. The most effective method of

> reducing traffic and pollution on these A-roads is

> simple; stop using single-occupancy cars for

> unnecessary journeys at the busiest times of the

> day.

>

>

> dulwichfolk Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I always ask the same question about the photos

> > and videos of people sitting in the

> road/parklet

> > having a drink at the square of shame unless it

> is

> > to wind up the displacement areas more then

> they

> > already are.

> >

Since the air quality should be made better for everyone, I want to know how is the council planning to improve it on the roads such as LL, Croxted Rd, EDG? Some of these roads are A roads which doesn't change the fact they are also very densely populated residential roads.


So while we wait for people to stop using their cars, which might never happen, the council is happy to let the buggers living on these roads to choke on the extra fumes and die of lung cancer 10 years earlier - because who cares? Certainly not the Labour councillors and by the look of things, many on this forum agree with it.

It's not a plan, it's always been the case - it's just that sat-nav systems (like Waze) route traffic along residential streets to save the driver 60 secs, instead of using the roads which have been designated to move traffic around London.

- here's a TFL map showing the network, which also includes LL.

http://content.tfl.gov.uk/tfl-base-map-master.pdf


This increase in traffic on residential roads has been increasing since the introduction of sat-nav technology around 2009. Alas, I'm not sure the tech giants are keen to address this - perhaps functions like asking if the journey is necessary, offering alternative/cheaper modes, or suggesting better times to travel, are around the corner?


- not sure I mentioned 'major A-roads', sounds like I'm talking about dual carriageway!

Well, off the top of my head,


The ULEZ extension in October. Although not perfect (electric vehicles still contribute heavy particulates through tyre/brake wear, and kickup these particles) it's a step to reducing pollution, and the number of vehicles on the roads


Selecting non-vehicular traffic deliveries is great - Southwark were doing this through the food drops with PedalMe - but great to see more policy change to incentivise this. PedalMe were offering free trips for people going to get vaccinated too.


There's free cycle-proficiency training and other initiatives in Southwark, plus a round of grants for e-pedal powered vehicles for businesses


....Fuel duty has been frozen for over ten years. Perhaps this should be boosted to make driving ICE vehicles and contributing to the pollution less appealing




ab29 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Since the air quality should be made better for

> everyone, I want to know how is the council

> planning to improve it on the roads such as LL,

> Croxted Rd, EDG? Some of these roads are A roads

> which doesn't change the fact they are also very

> densely populated residential roads.

>

> So while we wait for people to stop using their

> cars, which might never happen, the council is

> happy to let the buggers living on these roads to

> choke on the extra fumes and die of lung cancer 10

> years earlier - because who cares? Certainly not

> the Labour councillors and by the look of things,

> many on this forum agree with it.

An idle thought: if those most responsible for the traffic are rich stay at home parents in overpowered SUVs ferrying Tarquin and Jemima to and from local prep schools - is there any reason to believe that an inconvenient delay is going to cause them to stop doing so? If they?re that selfish they are not going to be bothered about holding up buses / poisoning main road residents/ forcing tradespeople out of the area; it?s perfectly nice inside the SUV, hands free mobile, back seat DVDs or an opportunity for some homework... I don?t think this will work to make that traffic evaporate.


Went past the Burbage Roundabout this afternoon and the kind man stopping people from inadvertently driving through the bus gates was there doing his great work. Of the four cars I saw him stop, all were elderly couples in very reasonably priced cars (not statistically meaningful, I know, just what I saw.)

I don't believe it is a case of closing off streets or a whole village to make "our streets safer" What the council have failed to do is make public transport more accessible. I work in Greenwich, in the summer I cycle. In the winter if I use public transport, I would take a bus to then get off & walk up The Lane to the station then another 40 mins onward journey when it can take me 25 mins in my car. There is also a train from Honor Oak Park but there is not a bus that will take me there either. 🙄
Agreed I cycled to work at London Bridge till I changed jobs and couldn?t face rotherhithe tunnel. I drove but switched to Overground as soon as that line was open. If creating new public transport routes would take too long/ ???? then think about rerouting buses/ bikes down shut roads or preferably the reverse.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...