Jump to content

Recommended Posts

because they are trying to claim it as an open space, being used for community purposes, to dissuade a reversal of the planning decision which closed that junction ?



nxjen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> https://twitter.com/dulwichsquare/status/129223098

> 1877891074?s=21

>

> Very contrived. Why would people want to hang out

> there when the more attractive and larger Park is

> just down the road?

Abe_froeman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I wonder of they'll have ice skating there in the

> winter.

>

> What else can they put on in privilege square?


Maybe , like the communist party of China does in Tiananmen Square, the council could put on an annual show of its might by driving dust carts through it once a year whilst the crowd politely clap chairman Peter John (if they don't clap they will face death by a thousand CPZs ) and the villagers can all release doves dyed red in his honor and to celebrate crushing the evil West's plan to allow freedom of driving


All hail emperor Ming.....


>

I love the way they celebrate the fact the "Square" has been created whilst the newly-created A-road that is Dulwich Village roars in the background.


I may be tempted to complain that they are blocking a major cycle route with these events....;-)

It is interesting to see our Councillor turn up to support, no effort to social distance at this Covid-19 designated closed junction and Southwark Events confirming that the organisers have no licence to use this space as none have been issued under Covid measures.


Southwark website:

Please be aware that we are not currently accepting, or processing event applications. We are working to produce guidance for the recommencement of public outdoor events in Southwark, in line with recent Government recommendations and this information should be available shortly.


https://www.southwark.gov.uk/events-culture-and-heritage/events/planning-an-event/hiring-a-park-or-public-open-space

He hasn't been answering questions on anything for some time...not just the closure of DV which he supported and actively used to lobby the residents of Melbourne Grove to gain support and lobby for his proposed closures of said road......


Probably on holiday, he's a schoolteacher so this is officially his time off.


The goings on at that junction are annoying now - there was some sort of musical duet there a couple of weeks ago, people standing around. It's still a road - there were still cyclists and pedestrians and a couple of people on mobility scooters looking to get through it all and finding it quite difficult, especially to maintain social distancing. Not going to be long before some idiot dancing in the "square" collides with a scooter or cyclist and blames the legitimate road user.

exdulwicher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The goings on at that junction are annoying now - there was some sort of musical duet there a couple of

> weeks ago, people standing around. It's still a road - there were still cyclists and pedestrians and a

> couple of people on mobility scooters looking to get through it all and finding it quite difficult,

> especially to maintain social distancing. Not going to be long before some idiot dancing in the "square"

> collides with a scooter or cyclist and blames the legitimate road user.


As I pointed out, interesting to see our Councillor turn up to support. Southwark Events have confirmed that the organisers have no licence to use this space as none are being issued under Covid measures.

See above posting Yesterday, 08:02PM.

hopskip Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> exdulwicher Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > The goings on at that junction are annoying now

> - there was some sort of musical duet there a

> couple of

> > weeks ago, people standing around. It's still a

> road - there were still cyclists and pedestrians

> and a

> > couple of people on mobility scooters looking to

> get through it all and finding it quite difficult,

>

> > especially to maintain social distancing. Not

> going to be long before some idiot dancing in the

> "square"

> > collides with a scooter or cyclist and blames

> the legitimate road user.

>

> As I pointed out, interesting to see our

> Councillor turn up to support. Southwark Events

> have confirmed that the organisers have no licence

> to use this space as none are being issued under

> Covid measures.

> See above posting Yesterday, 08:02PM.


Which councillor - James McAsh?

Abe_froeman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I wonder of they'll have ice skating there in the

> winter.

>

> What else can they put on in privilege square?


I'm disgusted about it and I live nearby but do not want to be associated with the people there. By the way, Au Ciel is one of the two businesses supporting the closure. Wonder why? Lucky they got their alcohol licence virtually nodded through.

I understand that gatherings of no more than 30 people are allowed. Looks like more than 30 people in the video. I wouldn?t be happy if I lived on Court Lane/Calton junction with all that going on outside, think the closure will be losing any remaining support with locals.

Yeah, it was so much nicer and safer when it was an endless chain of white Range Rovers driving 1.5km trips on Really Important Errands.


I can't stand people enjoying themselves.


roywj Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I understand that gatherings of no more than 30

> people are allowed. Looks like more than 30 people

> in the video. I wouldn?t be happy if I lived on

> Court Lane/Calton junction with all that going on

> outside, think the closure will be losing any

> remaining support with locals.

thebestnameshavegone Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yeah, it was so much nicer and safer when it was

> an endless chain of white Range Rovers driving

> 1.5km trips on Really Important Errands.

>

> I can't stand people enjoying themselves.

>

> roywj Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I understand that gatherings of no more than 30

> > people are allowed. Looks like more than 30

> people

> > in the video. I wouldn?t be happy if I lived on

> > Court Lane/Calton junction with all that going

> on

> > outside, think the closure will be losing any

> > remaining support with locals.


Really ... the rare white range rover, a very endangered species normally seen in its native environment of the scrappus yardus of Sloane


Bit of an exaggeration there tbnhg , now if you said family cars filled with families doing family things it might have been credible.


I think rouwj is referring to the risk presented by a large gathering of spreading the virus during a pandemic that hasn't gone away despite the way people are behaving

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...