Jump to content

Bloomers lingerie shop lordship lane


dullwitch

Recommended Posts

I visited Bloomers today (209 lordship lane, next to the mag pub) and had the best service that I've ever received in a lingerie shop.

In the past I've been to Rigby & Peller, Bravissimo, John Lewis etc, but nowhere have I been made to feel so welcome and relaxed.


It's fantastic to have a shop like this on my doorstep. Well worth a visit.

dullwitch Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> They used to be in ED warehouse apparently, but

> they recently moved location.


xxxxxxx


Hopefully they'll do better in LL. Is that the people who used to be upstairs at the ED Warehouse?


Great name for a lingerie shop btw (though could have been a flower shop!)


ETA: What used to be next to the Mag, was it that clothes shop? It always seemed a bit of an odd location.

The clothes shop is next door Sue. That is a great place too actually. They have some lovely clothes in there. Some are quite pricey, but then others are very reasonable. You just need to sift through. They have a downstairs too.


By the way, Sharon also mentioned that Bloomers have a treatment room downstairs where they will be offering beauty services that are not so readily available in Dulwich, such as Eyelash extentions and threading (and some other things, but I forgot).

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 4 months later...
  • 5 weeks later...

Just wanted to add my +1 to this. Needed to invest in a bunch of new underwear (for good, weight loss related reasons) and was have been putting it off for ages. Sharon was really helpful and patient, came up with some good options which weren't too expensive (as hopefully weight trend will continue!). Lots of really nice stock but good basics too which is what I'm more interested in.


Would really encourage people to give it a go. Use it or lose it! No connection - just happy customer.

  • 4 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Good advice Kipper!  The 1.0 early Ecoboost and 1.2 Puretech engines have wet cam belts that fail and failure with a cam belt invariably result in catastrophic  damage to valves and pistons. Later ones were changed to chains. Avoid at all costs!
    • Sorry. Link wasn't working on my phone, but it is now, and I couldn't delete the post.
    • Sent you a pm
    • I think there's a fair number of "participating" sub offices that do passports or, at least, play the "check and send" game (£16 for glancing at your form), so some degree of cherry-picking seems to be permitted. Though it does look as if Post Offices "Indentity Services" are where it things the future lies, and "Right to Rent" (though it's more an eligibility check) looks a bit of an earner, along with DBS checks and the Age Verification services that, if the government gets its way, we'll all need to subscribe to before we're allowed on mumsnet. Those services, incidentally, seem mostly outsourced to an outfit called "Yoti", a privately-owned, loss-making "identity platform" with debts of £150m, a tardy approach to filings, and a finger in a bunch of questionable pies ("Passive Facial Liveness Recognition" sounds gloriously sinister) so what the Post Office gets out of the arrangement isn't clear, but I'm sure they think it worthwhile. That said, they once thought the same of funeral plans which, for some peculiar reason, failed to set fire to the shuffling queues, even metaphorically. For most, it seems, Post Office work is mostly a dead loss, and even the parcel-juggling is more nuisance than blessing. As a nonchalant retailer of other people's services the organisation can only survive now on the back of subsidies, and we're not even sure what they are. The taxpayer-funded subsidies from government (a £136m hand-out to keep Horizon going, £1bn for its compensation scheme, around £50m for the network, and perhaps a loan or two) are clearish, but the cross-subsidies provided by other retail activities in branches are murkier. As are the "phantom shortfalls" created by the Horizon system, which secretly lined Post Office's coffers as postmasters balanced the books with contributions from their own pockets. Those never showed up in the accounts though - because Horizon *was* the accounting system - so we can't tell how much of a subsidy that was. We might get an idea of the scale, however, from Post Office's belated Horizon Shortfall Scheme, which is handing £75k to every branch that's complained, though it's anyone's guess if that's fair or not. Still, that's all supposed to be behind us now, and Post Office's CEO-of-the-week recently promised an "extra" £250m a year for the branches (roughly enough to cover a minimum wage worker in each), which might make it worth the candle for some. Though he didn't expect that would happen before 2030 (we can only wonder when his pension will mature) and then it'd be "subject to government funding", so it might have to be a very short candle as it doesn't look like a promise that he can make. Still, I wouldn't want to discourage anyone from applying for a franchise, and it's possible that, this time, Post Office will be telling the truth. And, you never know, we might all be back in the Post Office soon, and eagerly buying stamps, if only for existence permits, rather than for our letters.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...