Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That's hardly fair. They would be getting paid to

> be at work while other interested parties would

> have to take time off work.



Would you rather the council paid overtime to have it in the evening? I suspect the council are not paying much overtime at the moment.

Because the council offices,and staff are paid for regardless. Moving the concilliation meeting to ED community centre has alredy cost the tax payer unnecessary money as the venue had to be hired. If anything TGE should foot costs.
As i said,if its important people will be there. Maybe its a way of weeding out non serious objectors? 'gainfully employed' people take time off work to attend hospital appts,repairmen etc,they dont expect it to be out of working hours! Anyway,back on topic. . .

the-e-dealer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Whats the point if the entire working

> population, the ones who are paying for all this

> democracy are at work? And I didnt say dont use

> tooley street.


and


> its a total farce escluding most of the flipping tax payers who pay for all this showboat.


IT'S A DISGRACE!!!


Only working people that are employed during the day are entitled to an opinion on this.


No representation without taxation.


FFS!!

Thanks Minty - but I dont see why non workers shouldnt comme along at 6 too!

Yes its a disgrace?! Also its those who have to get up in the morning - for work- the taxpayers who have a big stake in preventing these late opening hours.

the-e-dealer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Also its those who have to

> get up in the morning - for work- the taxpayers

> who have a big stake in preventing these late

> opening hours.



The application for late opening has been withdrawn.

Why don't one of you who really cares about this (djsenior I'm looking at you) phone the pub, or go in there, and just ask exactly what the current state of play is regarding the application. I am sure the nice people working in there, who are not your enemy, they don't own the place, will happily tell you what they know.
anyone would think the meeting time and place, incidentally where all other such decisions across the borough are made, is planned deliberately to upset ed residents... y should this one application be any different to others eh?

Whatabout perhaps granting these nice people a licence....see how it goes...at least one would have a clear idea of the


noise levels and behaviour of our slightly tipsy but otherwise well mannered community members patronising the place.


If I does become intolerable then I am sure the forum will come very alive, the council will know about it, and somrthing


will be done. after all they are laws regarding loud noise.

But the extended hours part of the application HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN.


Meanwhile, two residents of Crystal Palace Road, were jailed for smuggling cocaine into the country (as reported by SLP). Perhaps ED isn't quite the utopia some think it should be ;)

TGE can apply for a a variation in its licence at any time, as many times as it likes, same for TENS so may not be over,just a different tactic. And all those that were glad to see the back of the CPT,& welcome TGE should be careful what they wish for.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...