Jump to content

Recommended Posts

laurak Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Park was empty yesterday. It's an expensive trip

> to the swings. Well done Southwark, you now have a

> nice bit of empty green land in the middle of

> London!


Possibly it was empty because it was a Monday after half term, everyone is back at school / work and the weather was rubbish!


At least give it a few weeks to collate the impact of it, not just one day!

tiddles Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The traffic wardens on bikes were buzzing around

> peckham rye car park yesterday. There is a two

> week grace period. All those poor soles in the CPZ

> zones can expect the same.


Perhaps the "poor soles" should migrate to the DP lake where they would feel at home!

Can you text payments on a non SMART phone ( a basic phone costing less than ?60 - pay as you go) if not this will affect many disabled people who do not qualify for a blue badge especially those who have very limited hearing/ poor speech due to deafness/physical disability.

Pugwash Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Can you text payments on a non SMART phone ( a

> basic phone costing less than ?60 - pay as you go)

> if not this will affect many disabled people who

> do not qualify for a blue badge especially those

> who have very limited hearing/ poor speech due to

> deafness/physical disability.



Somebody on another thread on here (I think, unless it was on Facebook) has said that you can.

To spider69, I sympathise with your health issues but find it hard to believe that Dulwich is your nearest green space in this Borough if you need two buses and a long walk to get there. Plus if there were fewer cars the roads might be more pleasant for walking?
I cant believe that Southwark want to add a parking fee to a public park. What a way to destroy the use of a green space that families can play in, older people can walk around and enjoy. There is no alternative place to par and increases parking problems and traffic in the village. This is not the way to get people fit by walking this is destruction of freedom . Well done Southwark - again another superb example of crap management

Walked through the park Sunday afternoon and counted 10 cars with parking tickets! And several shocked car owners returning to their vehicles to find unexpected tickets under the windscreen wiper!!


Also noticed the Dulwich Park 'Old College Gate' entrance on College Road has an outward facing Park Information board welcoming visitors and advising next to a big blue P icon "Free Parking in Marked Bays Only". No mention anywhere of the newly introduced ?2 an hour charge!!


Come on Southwark - if you're going to introduce a tax on park users, at least make it clear to drivers entering the park that parking charges now apply!!

Zig-Zag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> One car parked there today between 4.00 and

> 5.00ish. I know it was wet and a weekday but I

> walk to and round the park several times a week

> and have never seen only 1 car. No idea if people

> are parking elsewhere or avoiding the park

> altogether.


It would be good to remind visitors there is a 5mph speed limit at the same time! No one keeps to it. It is dangerous when there are small children and dogs here and there.

bobbsy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And the 5mph also applies to bicycles travelling

> around the park...few people if any stick to that.


Speed limits do not apply to bicycles because speed limits listed in the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 and also Rule 124 of the Highway Code relate to motor vehicles and not to bicycles.


There are one or two exceoptions - some of the Royal Parks have tried, with extremely limited success, to apply them to bikes and there's been maybe 2 or 3 high profile prosecution attempts in Richmond Park (where speeds of 40mph can be had on the long descent to Roehampton Gate).


Also, 5mph on a bike is far too slow, the cyclist will find it very difficult to balance at tat speed leading to wobbling and veering - which is more dangerous that just riding along at 10mph - the speed of a fast runner or a trotting horse. There are kids on skateboards and scooters doing more than 5mph too!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The private sector is not going to build a significant amount of social housing. Everyone is very keen for *everyone else* to subsidise construction of social housing. I take it none of the objectors to this scheme was suggesting putting up council tax so Southwark could build more social housing...? Social housing isn't going to appear in serious numbers if the state doesn't borrow money and build it.
    • They must be really desperate to collab with Tesla. Honestly, it's not even the worst thing they've done. I've noticed these sex events happening in the last few months at a place that's supposed to be a restaurant and venue. I was planning my wedding there and was appalled by the setup for those events. When I discovered what was going on, I was disgusted by how they were using the same rooms as 'playrooms' where families are supposed to eat. The hygiene and safety concerns are just unacceptable. We really need to come together as a community to put a stop to this! They're destroying a sacred, Grade II listed building, and it's just not right. The owners need to be held accountable for their actions. It's time for us to stand up and protect our heritage and ensure that these spaces are used appropriately, especially when they should be serving families and the community.   sex events vid.mp4 sex events videe.mp4 Literally promoting it on their Instagram! Only just taken down after scrutiny.     
    • yes, which properly explains why they responded to me on this occassion, as i included the CQC in my response. I have spoken to the Health Ombudsman, and they feel the regulator is more suited to the issues I have raise for more than a year now. welcome aboard. its great to have you on the thread. so sorry you are also experiencing issues. has this been addressed as yet?
    • Tbh most Tesla owners are people who are concerned about the environment and have purchased accordingly- but mr nut job has soured their purchasing- so I actually sympathise with them being associated with such an awful man. But to actively promote the company given the knowledge we now know about him makes utterly unacceptable. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...