Jump to content

Recommended Posts

laurak Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Park was empty yesterday. It's an expensive trip

> to the swings. Well done Southwark, you now have a

> nice bit of empty green land in the middle of

> London!


Possibly it was empty because it was a Monday after half term, everyone is back at school / work and the weather was rubbish!


At least give it a few weeks to collate the impact of it, not just one day!

tiddles Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The traffic wardens on bikes were buzzing around

> peckham rye car park yesterday. There is a two

> week grace period. All those poor soles in the CPZ

> zones can expect the same.


Perhaps the "poor soles" should migrate to the DP lake where they would feel at home!

Can you text payments on a non SMART phone ( a basic phone costing less than ?60 - pay as you go) if not this will affect many disabled people who do not qualify for a blue badge especially those who have very limited hearing/ poor speech due to deafness/physical disability.

Pugwash Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Can you text payments on a non SMART phone ( a

> basic phone costing less than ?60 - pay as you go)

> if not this will affect many disabled people who

> do not qualify for a blue badge especially those

> who have very limited hearing/ poor speech due to

> deafness/physical disability.



Somebody on another thread on here (I think, unless it was on Facebook) has said that you can.

To spider69, I sympathise with your health issues but find it hard to believe that Dulwich is your nearest green space in this Borough if you need two buses and a long walk to get there. Plus if there were fewer cars the roads might be more pleasant for walking?
I cant believe that Southwark want to add a parking fee to a public park. What a way to destroy the use of a green space that families can play in, older people can walk around and enjoy. There is no alternative place to par and increases parking problems and traffic in the village. This is not the way to get people fit by walking this is destruction of freedom . Well done Southwark - again another superb example of crap management

Walked through the park Sunday afternoon and counted 10 cars with parking tickets! And several shocked car owners returning to their vehicles to find unexpected tickets under the windscreen wiper!!


Also noticed the Dulwich Park 'Old College Gate' entrance on College Road has an outward facing Park Information board welcoming visitors and advising next to a big blue P icon "Free Parking in Marked Bays Only". No mention anywhere of the newly introduced ?2 an hour charge!!


Come on Southwark - if you're going to introduce a tax on park users, at least make it clear to drivers entering the park that parking charges now apply!!

Zig-Zag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> One car parked there today between 4.00 and

> 5.00ish. I know it was wet and a weekday but I

> walk to and round the park several times a week

> and have never seen only 1 car. No idea if people

> are parking elsewhere or avoiding the park

> altogether.


It would be good to remind visitors there is a 5mph speed limit at the same time! No one keeps to it. It is dangerous when there are small children and dogs here and there.

bobbsy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And the 5mph also applies to bicycles travelling

> around the park...few people if any stick to that.


Speed limits do not apply to bicycles because speed limits listed in the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 and also Rule 124 of the Highway Code relate to motor vehicles and not to bicycles.


There are one or two exceoptions - some of the Royal Parks have tried, with extremely limited success, to apply them to bikes and there's been maybe 2 or 3 high profile prosecution attempts in Richmond Park (where speeds of 40mph can be had on the long descent to Roehampton Gate).


Also, 5mph on a bike is far too slow, the cyclist will find it very difficult to balance at tat speed leading to wobbling and veering - which is more dangerous that just riding along at 10mph - the speed of a fast runner or a trotting horse. There are kids on skateboards and scooters doing more than 5mph too!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
    • Can’t recommend the company enough, great service. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...