Jump to content

Recommended Posts

As I said in my post above, neither Cafe Nero or East Dulwich are unique to this situation and people and councils seem divided in their opinions.


There's plenty of examples out there:-


Retrospective change of use - Hexham

Were the Reigate counsellors bribed with free coffee?

Work started before planning approval in East Hampshire

Chiswick councillors have balls?

Great News! Cafe Nero can continue trading in Sidcup

  • 3 weeks later...
I wonder how much Southwark Council are paying lawyers to try and close down a business that is self-evidently hugely popular with local people, especially families? Enough to save the Livesey museum? Frankly, it wouldn't suprise me. What a appalling bunch our local councillors are.

Emily Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I wonder how much Southwark Council are paying

> lawyers to try and close down a business that is

> self-evidently hugely popular with local people,

> especially families? Enough to save the Livesey

> museum? Frankly, it wouldn't suprise me. What a

> appalling bunch our local councillors are.


Why blame the councillors in this instance ?


Its Neros that went ahead without fuill permission, Its neros that are not taking the consulation / review priocess seriously - its Neros that is ensuring that its financial muscle is being used to slow down and hopefully exhaust the local authority process


Shut them down - this isnt a hypothetical discussion , ist about a PROFIT making venture deciding not the abide by the rules regaridng their fetid premises - they are not doing it for any altruistic reason - they are taking the piss becasue of money making potential


if you lose sight of the priciple here becasue you like their product , you will come to regret the results of the precedent set.

Emily - you may have a point re: Nero's popularity but a bit out of order to call the local councillours an appalling bunch - they are acting, not just to uphold teh law but also at the behest of many many people who vote them in. It's the democratic process and is inevitably weakened when those who put themselves forward are called "apalling" for doing their jobs


The pros and cons of Nero have long been discussed on here and I doubt we need to go into them again - but no need for personal abuse

That crack dealer on my street corner is really popular, especially with young people, I think it's unfair for the police and authorities to waste our taxpayers money hassling her as she's providing a service to lots of people.


Yeah, I know but I'm just making a point.


Fine Caffe Nero ?233,000 and put the money back into the community. Or ask them for a voluntary contribution of that amount to show they care about the the community.

I think they are appalling people. They waste MY money (how much? will any of them admit to how much - given that Southwark's legal fees were well over ?7million last year - on persecuting a highly popular local cafe, which offers disabled access, for a start, which none of the other local cafes do, then whine they have no money and shut down a totally unique museum for children, just so they can sell off a valuable building - one that was a gift to the PEOPLE for our benefit, not to Southwark Council to sell to the highest bidder. If they can't take criticism, then they shouldn't be touting for votes, for heavens sake.. Do they think I and many others would have voted for them if they'd suggested for one minute they'd start closing down museums that benefit poor children and flogging off buildings donated to the people to property developers? As for the lie that they can't afford ?140,000 a year, when we all know it's about snatching the building...

As for comparing a coffee shop to a crack dealer, well, frankly the comparison is so idiotic it doesn't really deserve a reply, does it?

19 posts and most of them about Nero Emily?


And comparing the illegaly opened coffee house with an illegaly operating drug dealer was already acknowledged as stretching a point - but you know, a business's popularity isn't the sole criteria for it's existence (hence the drug dealer anaology I assume)

Goodness me, you do need to get a hobby apart from post counting. Or are you the post police? I think if a business is harmless, useful, provides a popular local service to the local people - and a unique one, in terms of disabled access and space for parents to bring children - then I think it is an obscene waste of money for the local council, which is supposed to represent the people, to spend God knows how many thousands on lawyers trying to close it down. I think they forget they were voted in to represent the local population, which is clearly voting for Neros with their feet and their money.

So... Nero's aside, planning regulations should be scrapped or at least reduced? Should companies pay any attention to laws? Can anyone just forge ahead and say "we're harmless and popular!"


That Dulwich Park is ripe for development - maybe a mall with a shopping park. Sure some people would object but I don't have to worry about them any more because precedent has been set and planning laws are for namby-pamby PC liberals

The comparison to a crack dealer was just to show that your argument that "a business that is self-evidently hugely popular with local people" and should therefore be above the law seemed a bit silly. Rather like a comparison to a crack dealer.


And I think that Nero should stay, it sells things that people want and I agree it is popular but I would like them punished for breaking the rules, they can afford it and that money should be put back in to East Dulwich.

> I think they forget they were voted in to represent the local population, which is clearly voting for Neros with their feet and their money.


I think the above might be a fallacious argument.


All I see is Caffe Nero customers voting with their feet and their money.

I gather from friends who live in the borough of Croydon, that Nero's opened in the borough ( I think it was at Crystal Palace)some time ago without seeking planning permission or change of use. I have been told this is a standard Nero trick - they build up custom, flout local planning laws, local council takes them to task, and Nero defies all legal challenges/ ignores closure notices as they know it takes local council time and money to prosecute, in mean while Nero nets in tidy sums of money. Money no doubt to move into another area and start the whole process again.
I hope Cafe Nero stays, personally I prefer it to Starbucks or any of the other chains for that matter, at least you get a loyalty card and the quality of the coffee is good. The staff are friendly in there and as previous posts say, do we really want a derelict shop that at some point becomes another estate agent or poncey shop that sells baby clothes or nick-nacks. Okay, so they've not followed the rules, but I'm sure they aren't the first and probably won't be the last. I say fine them and let them get on with doing what they are good at ... serving coffee!
Oh come on, it's not remotely like a park being turned into shopping mall! It was already a retail premises, and still is. It's not like, ooh, let's think, a popular local free museum being closed down so the council can sell of the building to property developers (to pay the millions in legal costs incurred by pointless actions like this?), is it? Dulwich Park is hugely popular, and all the more so for having a nice cafe slap bang in the middle of it, actually. As for not popular with local people only 'customers', well who do you think is those customers are? Aliens from outer space? People specially flown in from the Outer Hebrides? Of course it is popular with people who live in East Dulwich, you know, the very people that the councillors are supposed to represent, not fight, especially not fight using untold thousands of pounds of our money. If the planning rules prevent a popular, useful, wheelchair and child accessible business from opening up where people clearly want it, then the planning laws are the problem, not the business. I have no problems with a successful business paying higher rates, but really, all this outrage is very silly. Agree the staff are lovely, if rather slow, and it appeals to the local community. It's a real meeting place. The people on this site with a visceral, irrational hatred of children and businesses, would hate it regardless of planning laws.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...