Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Wasn't just a scot/brit winning today


It was a scot/brit who had been constantly told he wouldn't / couldn't win who won


Something in that


Last 2 years have been some of the best sports years I've been party to


2012 Olympics

Euro 2012

Ryder cup

Murray semifinal

Murray final

Lions

Something about cricket



But today felt bigger than any of them. Watched final with friends and friends of friends and strangers. Guts were wrenched


And he only went and won


With style


Speeches ( winner and loser) were small things of beauty


Made me feel world can be better place.


That's sport

I've never supported individual British sportsmen/women just because they're British in things like Tennis or Boxing. There are British boxers who I've really wanted to see get knocked the fuck out by their non British opponent because they've come over so arrogant / cocky.


Athletics is a bit different, as they are paid sweet FA, and they tend to be all about winning for their country as well as themselves. Tennis players, boxers, F1 Drivers are in it for themselves and for the substantial money they earn, and all power to them for that, but I'm not going to support them just because they are British, I support the ones that appeal most to me and excite me most.


The other night after the semi final win the BBC showed some highlights of Murray, and I was thinking "my gosh he's really playing some awesome stuff, it's like watching Macenroe". Then they switched to the post match interview and his monotone voice, and I just thought "you bore me".


He's grown in to a wicked player, and I'd certainly cheer him against Federer any day. He'll probably go on and win a fair few grand slams now, and I wish him luck and will cheer his tennis, but at the end of the day he just doesn't have the personality to make me a big fan. With tennis I tend to like the slightly flawed and over emotional players.


But fair play, thoroughly deserved victory under the immense pressure a lot of the flag waving morons put him under.

The way things are going it?s going to seem like I?m picking fights with anything Otta posts ? I?m not really I?m broadly in agreement


Individual sports require the person to be driven to the exclusion of almost anything else ? it?s not even optional.


But it?s hard to look at Murray and see the people of Dunblan celebrating, and him talking about it and how it?s helped that town exorcise some ghosts and think ?he?s only in it for himself?

I quite like Andy... he's not some slick media personality, he's a normal person. He obviously doesn't like being interviewed, but he shows plenty of emotion on the court - probably too much - and is a hell of a fighter. It's good to see him realise his dreams and reach the peak of his sport (US Open, Wimbledon, Olympic Gold)... not something you see every day.
I see what Otta's saying though, I don't really see Andy Murray as representing Britain as such (that's what the Davis Cup is for). Although of course the support of the country will have helped motivate him, and obviously it's fantastic for Dunblane to be associated with something positive.

Totally agree about Dunblane. I wasn't suggesting that he's sone selfish bastard, I just mean that he's not out there representing his country, so I won't cheer him just because he's British. I'll cheer him fir playing well. It's just the fkag waving which annoys ne basically.


Andy Murray is probably a nicer bloke than any of the English football team, but they are a team sent out to represent England, so I'm more likely to supoort that team for patriotic reasons than any individual sports person.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I quite like Andy... he's not some slick media

> personality, he's a normal person. He obviously

> doesn't like being interviewed, but he shows

> plenty of emotion on the court - probably too much

> - and is a hell of a fighter. It's good to see him

> realise his dreams and reach the peak of his sport

> (US Open, Wimbledon, Olympic Gold)... not

> something you see every day.



All the good things have been said, which I agree with but "normal" - I don't think so really.


Loved the journey and watching him win, but it perhaps demonstrates that the winning personality that has helped him get there doesn't always come across very well.


He reminds me of Faldo, focussed to the point of being unaware of what's going on around him.


Yesterday BBC - How does it feel to win - "better than last year"

Today BBC - how does it feel to wake up a Wimbledon champion Andy - "It feels ok"


I think that off the court it takes an awful lot to get AM excited.

The last time I felt much of anything for a winner was when Ivanisevic won. Still no change.


The quality of the tennis has got better and better, but my interest has declined. The level of uberprofessionalism required to reach the top seems to have been at the expense of those indefinable bits and pieces of stuff that seemed to add up to something more.


So I guess I agree with Otta.



Anyway everybody else in the known universe is cock-a-hoop .. so whatevs.

Having been an Andy detractor I was actually pretty chuffed for him, if only because of how tense that final game was.

If he'd been broken you just had a sense of this script whereby he loses the tie-break and then the momentum goes with Djokovic.


It would have been Jana Novotna all over again and that would have been a horrible thing to witness, and he did play the match of his life to cruise past the world number one in straight sets so well done that man.


Having said all that I'm pretty much with the points made by otta and bob, plus I tend to find tennis pretty boring.


Wimbledon in nice weather has this nostalgic quality, a hazy sense of golden summers and soft breezes and playing in the garden and surrounding woods and generally being happy, but you have to miss Connors, McEnroe and those lovely wooden rackets. In fact was Lendl the beginning of the end?

Its the dominance of the baseliners (Murray Djokovic and Nadal) v the class of a more diverse game of eg Federer.


Baseline games can take a bit of time to get going and sometimes can be long and dull encounters despite what the commentators try to tell us - but can have some great passing shots.


Baseliner v serve and vollyer used to give the best matches at Wimbledon but they are a rare combo now.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> He reminds me of Faldo, focussed to the point of

> being unaware of what's going on around him.


I dunno... my interpretation is just of an introverted personality who loves the sport but has no interest in the limelight. More of a Paul Scholes or Kimi Raikkonen.

"Baseliner v serve and vollyer used to give the best matches at Wimbledon but they are a rare combo now."


I think it was the 1992 final, Agassi Vs Ivanisevic. One of my favourite matches ever.


"Wimbledon in nice weather has this nostalgic quality, a hazy sense of golden summers and soft breezes and playing in the garden and surrounding woods and generally being happy, but you have to miss Connors, McEnroe and those lovely wooden rackets. In fact was Lendl the beginning of the end?"



I still miss Steffi Graf's legs!


But seriously, the women's game used to be far more entertaining back then, before the power game started creeping in. Don't get me wrong, nuff respect to the Williams sisters, but the young Hingis was the last female tennis player that I used to really enjoy watching (for the tennis!!!!).

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> Speeches ( winner and loser) were small things of

> beauty

>

> Made me feel world can be better place.

>

> That's sport


xxxxxxx


Totally agree.


Great match and lovely speeches.


I do miss the serve and volley thing a bit though.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Time will tell if H&B are loved or loathed, the footfall they get and generate will determine if they stay or go. That's the nature of businesses, they come and go dependant on usage. Examples are M&S, Poundland Local, Co-op, Superdrug, Mons, the chain restaurant/takeaways, the chain Estate Agents, Toolstation, Screwfix to name a few.  As much as people would like to see Lordship Lane remain a high street of independents, it is becoming clear that due to Landlords hiking rents, some are unable to survive. This leaves empty units which some of the chain brands considering it to be worth a "punt". I'd have thought that businesses operating in shops is a better alternative than a high street with multiple empty units, but what do I know, they are just thoughts on the subject.   Take a look at Croydon and Bromley where what were once thriving high streets are in decline.  I have to say that some of the prices charged by the independents are eye watering, and incomes i'd have thought have to be substantial to afford their prices. Personally I'd love a Lidl to open on what was the site of the Harvester, but I guess that would get shouted down, oh the thought of Lidl in Dulwich. Whatever next. 
    • IMO, Sealy, the best nights sleep you'll ever have.  
    • I don’t know what the shop was originally next to the big St Christopher’s but if Holland and Barrett are taking it over then surely it’s good to have a choice on Lordship Lane? The Camberwell H&B is always empty but the Brixton branch busy.  I remember when the Marks & Spencer food shop was Iceland? Now the M&S is a very busy store and at the time regenerated the high street!
    • Nor would I have done, but it came up when I googled John Lewis reviews. Do you not trust TrustPilot reviews? Even allowing for the fact that many people only post reviews when they have had poor service, 27% one star reviews is indicative of something wrong, I would say. That's 27% of 76,392 reviews. That's an awful lot of people who don't  think the service they got from John Lewis was even worth two stars, let alone more. Screenshot attached.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...