Jump to content

Recommended Posts

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "For a long time before their success, Spanish

> footballers were regarded as underachievers in

> relation to their ability."

>

> Your point?


There's a fine line between failure and success. And sometimes the most talented player/team don't always win.


Also the problem with Andy is that he was trying too hard, hence the number of slips throughout the game.

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Also the problem with Andy is that he was trying

> too hard, hence the number of slips throughout the

> game.


This is true. I won Wimbledon one year by not trying at all. I didn't even enter.


They just mailed the trophy and the cheque to me.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Undisputedtruth Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > Also the problem with Andy is that he was

> trying

> > too hard, hence the number of slips throughout

> the

> > game.

>

> This is true. I won Wimbledon one year by not

> trying at all. I didn't even enter.

>

> They just mailed the trophy and the cheque to me.


xxxxxxx


LOL

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jeremy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Mick Mac Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > I think its a pretty poor excuse that he's up

> > > against 3 world class players...

> > >

> > > Would he have fared any better in the era of

> > Borg,

> > > McEnroe and Connors ?

> >

> > Ditto Sampras/Agassi. Or even Becker and

> Edberg.

> > Would his chances have been any better when

> these

> > guys were top of the rankings?

>

> Of course there will always be good players in any

> era, but IMO what marks out the current era is the

> all round depth of quality of Fed, Rafa and

> Djokovic. It's unusual to have 3 world class

> players capable of winning on all surfaces, thus

> making it harder for Murray to win any of the

> Slams.

> Fed, Rafa and Djokovic, have each won the 4 Grand

> Slams. There are no surface specialists in that

> group. Borg never won at the US or Oz Open.

> McEnroe never won at the French or Oz Open.

> Also, in the open tennis era there have only been

> 6 players to win three or more Grand Slam singles

> titles in a calendar year...Rod Laver, Jimmy

> Connors, Mats Wilander, Roger Federer, Rafael

> Nadal, and Novak Djokovic. Note the last 3...


Simon Barnes in the Times on Friday made the point, rather well I thought, that the "it's tough to be playing in the Golden Era" was false, and that if AM were to triumph in an era when the opposition were poor then the joy and satisfaction would be less.


To win at the highest level you need high level opposition - walkovers and one sided matches may, sometimes, be satisfying for the fans (vide current failure of Australia in the ODI series) for genuine enthusiasts and the sportsmen themselves it is to be among the best and beating the best that brings the satisfaction.


Mountaineers want to scale Everest, not One Tree Hill.

I think Murray needs a break in a Grand Slam, once the first one is won it seems that players get propelled forward mentally after the win. Look at who Nadal, Federer and Djokovich beat to win their first major, Puerta (who), Phillipoussis and Tsonga.


Sometimes to get to the top of everest, MM ,the weather has to be in your favour.

As much as I like Simon Barnes, he often searches for an editorial that is 'different' at the cost of being disingenuous. This being a classic case. Murray is a better player having had to confront these all time giants but would surely have had more success if at least one or two of them weren't ever present in this era.
  • 1 month later...

'bout now Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think Murray needs a break in a Grand Slam, once

> the first one is won it seems that players get

> propelled forward mentally after the win. Look at

> who Nadal, Federer and Djokovich beat to win their

> first major, Puerta (who), Phillipoussis and

> Tsonga.

>

> Sometimes to get to the top of everest, MM ,the

> weather has to be in your favour.


To follow other threads, told you!

Wasnt a million miles away! The Olympics was a massive lift for Muzz and that confidence carried forward last night. Fricking great achievement and now see Djocko and Murray taking those top 2 slots. Nadals game will just take its toll on his knees...


Last nights result of course now relegates me to Stirlingshires 2nd greatest sporting export!...


Help-Ma-Boab Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> He's the same age as Djocko and reckon him and

> Murray will move into the top 2 as Rodge le podge

> moves into retirement phase and Nadal knackers his

> knees and body.

>

> He's not a million miles away from a slam IMHO,

> needs to work a bit on 2nd serve and converting

> breaks when they matter. Lendl will be a good

> influence if they stick together on it. Still a

> good tourney for Murray I reckon and next year, a

> slam awaits.

>

> Feds movement yesterday was a joy to watch, but

> Murrays no slouch either.

  • 9 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...