Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Somerfield are a rip off though, about a third of their "special offers" don't ever seem to show up on the till, plus their prices seem to be on average a good third higher than in their Camberwell store. After the refurb, they lost almost all their original staff too, which was a damn shame. Only been to Waitroses once and they were really expensive but had some interesting stuff on sale.


I hope Somerfield cleans up its act on its pricing and sends its management on a food safety course. What a tragedy the fresh fish counter disappeared to be replaced by spit roast chickens.

Well, out of a choice of those I would definitely vote for Waitrose. It's part of the John Lewis Partnership, which is my favourite shop and in my limited experience of Waitrose their stuff is of very good quality and not really much more expensive than other supermarkets. I occasionally get stuff through Ocado and tend to spend less on a week's shop than I do when I go to Sainsbos; obviously there is less impulse purchasing but the prices compare pretty well.


KK - "At least the ED Somerfield provides better quality products than the ED Sainsbury's rubbish." Can you give me some examples please? My experience of Somerfields is not the case.

my aversion to supermarkets is well documented, but if I have to use one then I prefer the scale of the Somerfield on LL


Who actually occupies the space I'm less bothered by - can't see Somefield doing that worse a job than anyone else. I have a soft spot for Waitrose, just from the perspective of a more intersting selction of things as well as a better record on supplier treatment

I'm not saying Somerfield is the best to shop in just given the options from the "chains" in ED I prefer, for a quick shop, (not meaning the queues) to go there.

The bread stays fresher longer than does the Sainsburys bread which only usually lasts a day before the staleness sets in, the fruit and veg also (in my experience) last long and for fresh meat etc the dates are better.

Granted the special offers, for want a better word, "suck" where you can better deals elsewhere but as I said for a quick shop I wouldn't necessarily be looking for any special offers.

A proper Tesco or Asda would be a merry replacement for the shop. :))

Interesting - Robert Tchenguiz also owns a substantial number of Sainsbury's shares and was keen to flog off Sainsbury's supermarkets, in a planned move with the Qatar government, but that bid failed. Maybe this one too.


Edited to Add: I find Somerfield a complete rip-off. Tons of stuff in there is really expensive, such as loaves of bread (just your standard sliced stuff) at ?1.85, butter at nearly ?2 per tub and my favourite chocolate biscuits (the Tunnock's caramel wafers and teackes) are more expensive than at Sainsbury's, where you get a bigger pack. I avoid it unless I have no other choice.

Yup - I think this deal, on balance, is a no-goer. Research from JP Morgan points out that the chain is probably worth less than is being claimed and that sales are overall not so impressive when taken out of a Christmas seasonal context. That and most of their retail locations are "lower quality" than what a Waitrose would want. Waitrose say they're interested, but would only want to pick the choicest locations (obviously ED would be one) but putting together that kind of package would be more difficult than selling the lot en bloc.


http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/c7d63a56-c54b-11dc-811a-0000779fd2ac.html

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> :o Brendan! Wot about the girlies who work for

> them... wot would they compare? shades of

> lipstick? What the best brand of peroxide? ;-)

> yeah yeah I know twas a terrible stereotyping. It

> was the squeaky voice in me head that made me do

> it!


I was going to say wage packet ;-)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
    • Can’t recommend the company enough, great service. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...